These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

291 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33057831)

  • 1. Effects of Women's Short-Term Mating Orientation and Self-Perceived Attractiveness in Rating and Viewing Men's Waist to Chest Ratios.
    Garza R; Byrd-Craven J
    Arch Sex Behav; 2021 Feb; 50(2):543-551. PubMed ID: 33057831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Women's Mating Strategies and Mate Value Are Associated with Viewing Time to Facial Masculinity.
    Garza R; Byrd-Craven J
    Arch Sex Behav; 2023 Jul; 52(5):2143-2151. PubMed ID: 37245165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Self-Perceived Mate Value, Facial Attractiveness, and Mate Preferences: Do Desirable Men Want It All?
    Arnocky S
    Evol Psychol; 2018; 16(1):1474704918763271. PubMed ID: 29534596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sociosexual attitudes and dyadic sexual desire independently predict women's preferences for male vocal masculinity.
    O'Connor JJ; Jones BC; Fraccaro PJ; Tigue CC; Pisanski K; Feinberg DR
    Arch Sex Behav; 2014 Oct; 43(7):1343-53. PubMed ID: 24830906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sexual dimorphism of male face shape, partnership status and the temporal context of relationship sought modulate women's preferences for direct gaze.
    Conway CA; Jones BC; DeBruine LM; Little AC
    Br J Psychol; 2010 Feb; 101(Pt 1):109-21. PubMed ID: 19460236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A multivariate analysis of women's mating strategies and sexual selection on men's facial morphology.
    Clarkson TR; Sidari MJ; Sains R; Alexander M; Harrison M; Mefodeva V; Pearson S; Lee AJ; Dixson BJW
    R Soc Open Sci; 2020 Jan; 7(1):191209. PubMed ID: 32218951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Gender-Specificity in Viewing Time Among Heterosexual Women.
    Xu Y; Rahman Q; Zheng Y
    Arch Sex Behav; 2017 Jul; 46(5):1361-1374. PubMed ID: 27511206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Women's Preferences for Strong Men Under Perceived Harsh Versus Safe Ecological Conditions.
    Garza R; Pazhoohi F; Byrd-Craven J
    Evol Psychol; 2021; 19(3):14747049211032351. PubMed ID: 34296646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Changes in salivary estradiol predict changes in women's preferences for vocal masculinity.
    Pisanski K; Hahn AC; Fisher CI; DeBruine LM; Feinberg DR; Jones BC
    Horm Behav; 2014 Aug; 66(3):493-7. PubMed ID: 25051294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The long and short of mistress relationships: Sex-differentiated mate preferences reflect a compromise of mating ideals.
    Choy BKC; Li NP; Tan K
    J Pers; 2023 Apr; 91(2):383-399. PubMed ID: 35567542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The masculinity paradox: facial masculinity and beardedness interact to determine women's ratings of men's facial attractiveness.
    Dixson BJ; Sulikowski D; Gouda-Vossos A; Rantala MJ; Brooks RC
    J Evol Biol; 2016 Nov; 29(11):2311-2320. PubMed ID: 27488414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Do women's preferences for masculine voices shift across the ovulatory cycle?
    Jünger J; Motta-Mena NV; Cardenas R; Bailey D; Rosenfield KA; Schild C; Penke L; Puts DA
    Horm Behav; 2018 Nov; 106():122-134. PubMed ID: 30342884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Netflix and Chill? What Sex Differences Can Tell Us About Mate Preferences in (Hypothetical) Booty-Call Relationships.
    March E; Van Doorn G; Grieve R
    Evol Psychol; 2018; 16(4):1474704918812138. PubMed ID: 30428700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sociosexuality predicts women's preferences for symmetry in men's faces.
    Quist MC; Watkins CD; Smith FG; Little AC; Debruine LM; Jones BC
    Arch Sex Behav; 2012 Dec; 41(6):1415-21. PubMed ID: 21882053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Testing strategic pluralism: The roles of attractiveness and competitive abilities to understand conditionality in men's short-term reproductive strategies.
    Figueroa O; Muñoz-Reyes JA; Rodriguez-Sickert C; Valenzuela N; Pavez P; Ramírez-Herrera O; Pita M; Diaz D; Fernández-Martínez AB; Polo P
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(8):e0237315. PubMed ID: 32866153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Self-rated Attractiveness and Sociosexual Behavior Predict Gay Men's Preferences for Masculine Cues in Male Voices in China.
    Zhang J; Zheng L; Zheng Y
    Evol Psychol; 2019; 17(2):1474704919847430. PubMed ID: 31068003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reading men's faces: women's mate attractiveness judgments track men's testosterone and interest in infants.
    Roney JR; Hanson KN; Durante KM; Maestripieri D
    Proc Biol Sci; 2006 Sep; 273(1598):2169-75. PubMed ID: 16901836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sexual orientation predicts men's preferences for sexually dimorphic face-shape characteristics: A replication study.
    Shiramizu V; Docherty C; DeBruine LM; Jones BC
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(11):e0242262. PubMed ID: 33186368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Men's Mate Value Correlates with a Less Restricted Sociosexual Orientation: A Meta-Analysis.
    Arnocky S; Desrochers J; Rotella A; Albert G; Hodges-Simeon C; Locke A; Belanger J; Lynch D; Kelly B
    Arch Sex Behav; 2021 Nov; 50(8):3663-3673. PubMed ID: 34327590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The evolutionary psychology of human mating: a response to Buller's critique.
    Klasios J
    Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci; 2014 Sep; 47 Pt A():1-11. PubMed ID: 24927270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.