BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33058243)

  • 1. Inline and offline extracorporeal photopheresis: Device performance, cell yields and clinical response.
    Piccirillo N; Putzulu R; Massini G; Di Giovanni A; Giammarco S; Metafuni E; Sica S; Zini G; Chiusolo P
    J Clin Apher; 2021 Feb; 36(1):118-126. PubMed ID: 33058243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Inline extracorporeal photopheresis: evaluation of cell collection efficiency.
    Piccirillo N; Putzulu R; Massini G; Di Giovanni A; Chiusolo P; Sica S; Zini G
    Transfusion; 2019 Dec; 59(12):3714-3720. PubMed ID: 31682286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mononuclear cell collection for extracorporeal photopheresis by using the "off-line" system: A comparative study between COBE Spectra and Spectra Optia devices.
    Pascual C; González-Arias E; Pérez-Corral AM; Bailén R; Gayoso J; Besson N; Serrano D; Kwon M; Anguita J; Díez-Martín JL
    J Clin Apher; 2019 Aug; 34(4):359-366. PubMed ID: 30549092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mononuclear cell collection for extracorporeal photochemotherapy: a study comparing an automatic and a semiautomatic apheresis device.
    Del Fante C; Scudeller L; Viarengo G; Cervio M; Perotti C
    Transfusion; 2013 Sep; 53(9):2027-33. PubMed ID: 23305183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Does Offline Beat Inline Treatment: Investigation into Extracorporeal Photopheresis.
    Helmberg W; Sipurzynski S; Groselje-Strehle A; Greinix H; Schlenke P
    Transfus Med Hemother; 2020 Jun; 47(3):198-204. PubMed ID: 32595424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A paired trial comparing mononuclear cell collection in two machines for further inactivation through an inline or offline extracorporeal photopheresis procedure.
    Bueno JL; Alonso R; Gonzalez-Santillana C; Naya D; Romera I; Alarcón A; Aguilar M; Bautista G; Duarte R; Ussetti P; Cabrera JR
    Transfusion; 2019 Jan; 59(1):340-346. PubMed ID: 30284302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cost comparison of extracorporeal photopheresis technologies at the European Institute of Oncology.
    Magarò A; Lucchetti B; Caime A; Lionetti MT; Laszlo D
    J Clin Apher; 2021 Jun; 36(3):364-369. PubMed ID: 33476456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mononuclear cell collection for extracorporeal photopheresis: Concentrate characteristics for off-line UV-A irradiation procedure.
    Piccirillo N; Putzulu R; Massini G; Fiore AG; Chiusolo P; Sica S; Zini G
    J Clin Apher; 2018 Jun; 33(3):217-221. PubMed ID: 28833438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Technical comparison of four different extracorporeal photopheresis systems.
    Brosig A; Hähnel V; Orsó E; Wolff D; Holler E; Ahrens N
    Transfusion; 2016 Oct; 56(10):2510-2519. PubMed ID: 27456672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Extracorporeal photopheresis for graft versus host disease: Identifying a clinical pathway and associated resource utilization.
    Yerrabothala S; Talebian L; Klinker K; Hickman J; Hill JM; Hayes C; Lowrey C; Szczepiorkowski ZM; Meehan KR
    J Clin Apher; 2018 Jun; 33(3):310-315. PubMed ID: 29193271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Development of iron deficiency anemia in patients undergoing extracorporeal photopheresis: Comparison of the UVAR and CELLEX instruments.
    Moosavi MM; Goodman AL; Duncan A; Stowell SR; Waller EK; Roback JD; Sullivan HC
    J Clin Apher; 2021 Feb; 36(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 32894888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of the CELLEX™ and UVAR-XTS™ closed-system extracorporeal photopheresis devices in the treatment of chronic graft-versus-host disease.
    Whittle RM; Denney H; Chantry AD; Alfred A; Taylor PC
    J Clin Apher; 2017 Dec; 32(6):462-473. PubMed ID: 28608529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Real-World Experience in Extracorporeal Photopheresis for Adults with Graft-versus-Host Disease.
    Asensi Cantó P; Sanz Caballer J; Sopeña Pell-Ilderton C; Solís Ruiz J; Lloret Madrid P; Villalba Montaner M; Facal Malvar A; Chorão P; Guerreiro M; Balaguer Roselló A; Montoro Gómez J; Santiago Balsera M; Solves Alcaína P; Sanz Alonso MÁ; De la Rubia Comos J; Gómez-Seguí I
    Transplant Cell Ther; 2023 Dec; 29(12):765.e1-765.e8. PubMed ID: 37703997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Safety and Outcomes of Extracorporeal Photopheresis With the Therakos Cellex System for Graft-Versus-Host Disease in Pediatric Patients.
    Uygun V; Daloglu H; Karasu G; Hazar V; Yeşilipek A
    J Pediatr Hematol Oncol; 2015 Apr; 37(3):209-14. PubMed ID: 25374287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Efficacy and safety of one-day offline extracorporeal photopheresis schedule processing one total blood volume for treating patients with graft-versus-host disease.
    Cid J; Carbassé G; Suárez-Lledó M; Moreno DF; Martínez C; Gutiérrez-García G; Fernández-Avilés F; Rosiñol L; Giavedoni P; Mascaró JM; Agustí C; Marín P; Rovira M; Urbano-Ispizua Á; Lozano M
    Transfusion; 2019 Aug; 59(8):2636-2642. PubMed ID: 31135994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Collection efficiency of mononuclear cells in offline extracorporeal photopheresis: can processing time be shortened?
    Kartal O; Lindlbauer N; Laner-Plamberger S; Rohde E; Foettinger F; Ombres L; Zimmermann G; Mrazek C; Lauth W; Grabmer C
    Blood Transfus; 2024 Mar; 22(2):150-156. PubMed ID: 37458722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Photopheresis in pediatric graft-versus-host disease after allogeneic marrow transplantation: clinical practice guidelines based on field experience and review of the literature.
    Kanold J; Merlin E; Halle P; Paillard C; Marabelle A; Rapatel C; Evrard B; Berger C; Stephan JL; Galambrun C; Piguet C; D'Incan M; Bordigoni P; Deméocq F
    Transfusion; 2007 Dec; 47(12):2276-89. PubMed ID: 17764513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Extracorporeal photopheresis in paediatric patients: A retrospective comparison between different 'off-line' protocols.
    Sebastián E; Andrés Esteban EM; González-Vicent M; González de Pablo J; Zubicaray J; Gálvez E; Guillén M; Ruiz Pato J; Molina B; Albi G; Ramírez M; Castillo A; Pérez Maroto F; Madero L; Díaz MÁ; Sevilla J
    Vox Sang; 2022 Oct; 117(10):1220-1229. PubMed ID: 36102135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Favorable impact of extracorporeal photopheresis in acute and chronic graft versus host disease: Prospective single-center study.
    Sakellari I; Gavriilaki E; Batsis I; Mallouri D; Panteliadou AK; Lazaridou A; Vardi A; Constantinou V; Yannaki E; Papalexandri A; Kaloyannidis P; Smias C; Anagnostopoulos A
    J Clin Apher; 2018 Dec; 33(6):654-660. PubMed ID: 30394564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Extracorporeal photopheresis performed on the CELLEX® compared with the UVAR-XTS® instrument is more efficient and better tolerated in children with steroid-refractory graft-versus-host disease.
    Kapadia E; Wong E; Perez-Albuerne E; Jacobsohn D
    Pediatr Blood Cancer; 2015 Aug; 62(8):1485-8. PubMed ID: 25881179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.