These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33058363)

  • 1. Effect of artificial aging on high translucent dental zirconia: simulation of early failure.
    Skjold A; Schriwer C; Gjerdet NR; Øilo M
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2020 Dec; 128(6):526-534. PubMed ID: 33058363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of Surface Treatment and Cement on Fracture Load of Traditional Zirconia (3Y), Translucent Zirconia (5Y), and Lithium Disilicate Crowns.
    Lawson NC; Jurado CA; Huang CT; Morris GP; Burgess JO; Liu PR; Kinderknecht KE; Lin CP; Givan DA
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Jul; 28(6):659-665. PubMed ID: 31145492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Monolithic zirconia dental crowns. Internal fit, margin quality, fracture mode and load at fracture.
    Schriwer C; Skjold A; Gjerdet NR; Øilo M
    Dent Mater; 2017 Sep; 33(9):1012-1020. PubMed ID: 28662859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Survivability and fracture resistance of monolithic and multi-yttria-layered zirconia crowns as a function of yttria content: A mastication simulation study.
    Badr Z; Culp L; Duqum I; Lim CH; Zhang Y; A Sulaiman T
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2022 Jun; 34(4):633-640. PubMed ID: 35312154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of Endodontic Access Preparation on Fracture Load of Translucent versus Conventional Zirconia Crowns with Varying Occlusal Thicknesses.
    Nejat AH; Dupree P; Kee E; Xu X; Zakkour W; Odom M; Bruggers K; Mascarenhas F
    J Prosthodont; 2021 Oct; 30(8):706-710. PubMed ID: 33484219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of preparation taper on the resistance to fracture of monolithic zirconia crowns.
    Schriwer C; Gjerdet NR; Arola D; Øilo M
    Dent Mater; 2021 Aug; 37(8):e427-e434. PubMed ID: 33910755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fracture load of ceramic restorations after fatigue loading.
    Baladhandayutham B; Lawson NC; Burgess JO
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Aug; 114(2):266-71. PubMed ID: 25985741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ultrathin lithium disilicate and translucent zirconia crowns for posterior teeth: Survival and failure modes.
    Benalcazar Jalkh EB; Ramalho IS; Bergamo ETP; Alves LMM; Tanaka R; Witek L; Coelho PG; Hirata R; Bonfante EA
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2024 Feb; 36(2):381-390. PubMed ID: 37676053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mechanical Fatigue Analysis of PEEK as Alternative to Zirconia for Definitive Hybrid Abutments Supporting All-Ceramic Crowns.
    Barbosa-Júnior SA; Pereira GKR; Dapieve KS; Machado PS; Valandro LF; Schuh C; Consani RLX; Bacchi A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2020; 35(6):1209-1217. PubMed ID: 33270062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fatigue resistance and failure mode of adhesively restored custom implant zirconia abutments.
    Oderich E; Boff LL; Cardoso AC; Magne P
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Dec; 23(12):1360-8. PubMed ID: 22117899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Load at fracture of monolithic and bilayered zirconia crowns with and without a cervical zirconia collar.
    Øilo M; Kvam K; Gjerdet NR
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 May; 115(5):630-6. PubMed ID: 26775244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of the yttrium content on the fracture strength of monolithic zirconia crowns after artificial aging.
    Elsayed A; Meyer G; Wille S; Kern M
    Quintessence Int; 2019; 50(5):344-348. PubMed ID: 30892294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Zirconium dioxide based dental restorations. Studies on clinical performance and fracture behaviour.
    Larsson C
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 2011; (213):9-84. PubMed ID: 21919311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fracture Resistance of Monolithic Glass-Ceramics Versus Bilayered Zirconia-Based Restorations.
    Hamza TA; Sherif RM
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Jan; 28(1):e259-e264. PubMed ID: 29044828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Aging resistance, mechanical properties and translucency of different yttria-stabilized zirconia ceramics for monolithic dental crown applications.
    Camposilvan E; Leone R; Gremillard L; Sorrentino R; Zarone F; Ferrari M; Chevalier J
    Dent Mater; 2018 Jun; 34(6):879-890. PubMed ID: 29598882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of cementation techniques on fracture load of monolithic zirconia crowns.
    Indergård JA; Skjold A; Schriwer C; Øilo M
    Biomater Investig Dent; 2021; 8(1):160-169. PubMed ID: 34693294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fracture resistance of monolithic zirconia molar crowns with reduced thickness.
    Nakamura K; Harada A; Inagaki R; Kanno T; Niwano Y; Milleding P; Örtengren U
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2015; 73(8):602-8. PubMed ID: 25635734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fracture Strength of Zirconia and Alumina Ceramic Crowns Supported by Implants.
    Traini T; Sorrentino R; Gherlone E; Perfetti F; Bollero P; Zarone F
    J Oral Implantol; 2015 Jul; 41 Spec No():352-9. PubMed ID: 24779915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Monolithic crowns fracture analysis: The effect of material properties, cusp angle and crown thickness.
    Shahmoradi M; Wan B; Zhang Z; Wilson T; Swain M; Li Q
    Dent Mater; 2020 Aug; 36(8):1038-1051. PubMed ID: 32534794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fracture Strength of Implant-Supported Ceramic Crowns with Customized Zirconia Abutments: Screw Retained vs. Cement Retained.
    Nogueira LB; Moura CD; Francischone CE; Valente VS; Alencar SM; Moura WL; Soares Martins GA
    J Prosthodont; 2016 Jan; 25(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 25754496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.