These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33058694)

  • 1. Development of the English Listening and Reading Computerized Revised Token Test Into Cantonese: Validity, Reliability, and Sensitivity/Specificity in People With Aphasia and Healthy Controls.
    Bakhtiar M; Wong MN; Tsui EKY; McNeil MR
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 Nov; 63(11):3743-3759. PubMed ID: 33058694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reading and listening comprehension in Cantonese-speaking people with right hemisphere versus left hemisphere brain damage.
    Bakhtiar M; Wong MN; Lam MW; McNeil MR
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2023 Jun; 37(4-6):567-582. PubMed ID: 36779905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reliability and validity of the computerized Revised Token Test: comparison of reading and listening versions in persons with and without aphasia.
    McNeil MR; Pratt SR; Szuminsky N; Sung JE; Fossett TR; Fassbinder W; Lim KY
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 58(2):311-24. PubMed ID: 25569547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comprehensive Assessment of Reading in Aphasia (CARA) reading questionnaire-German version.
    Thumbeck SM; Webster J; Domahs F
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2023; 58(5):1588-1609. PubMed ID: 37077024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A study on the reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Scenario Test for people with chronic stroke-induced aphasia: A cross-sectional study.
    Kodani Y; Sekine K; Tanaka Y; Nagami S; Nakamura K; Fukunaga S; Nakamura H
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38691670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validation of a Cantonese Version of the Amsterdam-Nijmegen Everyday Language Test (CANELT): A functional approach.
    Wong WWS
    PLoS One; 2024; 19(5):e0303810. PubMed ID: 38787889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Auditory performance characteristics of the Computerized Revised Token Test (CRTT).
    Eberwein CA; Pratt SR; McNeil MR; Fossett TR; Szuminsky NJ; Doyle PJ
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Aug; 50(4):865-77. PubMed ID: 17675592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Moroccan Arabic Bedside Western Aphasia Battery-Revised: Linguistic and Psychometric Properties.
    El Ouardi L; Yeou M; Rami Y; Belahsen MF
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2023 Jul; 66(7):2376-2389. PubMed ID: 37227788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Validity and Reliability of the Language Battery in Comprehensive Aphasia Test-Turkish (CAT-TR).
    Özdemir Ş; Maviş İ; Tunçer AM
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2022 Aug; 51(4):789-802. PubMed ID: 35235112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Russian Aphasia Test: The first comprehensive, quantitative, standardized, and computerized aphasia language battery in Russian.
    Ivanova MV; Akinina YS; Soloukhina OA; Iskra EV; Buivolova OV; Chrabaszcz AV; Stupina EA; Khudyakova MV; Akhutina TV; Dragoy O
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(11):e0258946. PubMed ID: 34793469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Measuring verbal and non-verbal communication in aphasia: reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change of the Scenario Test.
    van der Meulen I; van de Sandt-Koenderman WM; Duivenvoorden HJ; Ribbers GM
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2010; 45(4):424-35. PubMed ID: 20144004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Montreal-Toulouse language assessment battery for aphasia: validity and reliability evidence.
    Pagliarin KC; Ortiz KZ; Parente MA; Arteche A; Joanette Y; Nespoulous JL; Fonseca RP
    NeuroRehabilitation; 2014; 34(3):463-71. PubMed ID: 24473247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Turkish validity and reliability study on the quick aphasia battery.
    Parlak MM; Köse A
    Brain Behav; 2024 Jan; 14(1):e3343. PubMed ID: 38376032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessing Language in Unstructured Conversation in People With Aphasia: Methods, Psychometric Integrity, Normative Data, and Comparison to a Structured Narrative Task.
    Leaman MC; Edmonds LA
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2021 Nov; 64(11):4344-4365. PubMed ID: 34618599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Validity and reliability of a new test for Turkish-speaking aphasic patients: Ege Aphasia Test.
    Calis FA; On AY; Durmaz B
    NeuroRehabilitation; 2013; 32(1):157-63. PubMed ID: 23422469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Translation and Cross-cultural Adaptation of the Aphasia Check List in Persian Speakers With Aphasia.
    Modarres Zadeh A; Mehri A; Jalaei S; Khatoonabadi AR; Kalbe E
    Basic Clin Neurosci; 2021; 12(4):477-488. PubMed ID: 35154588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The main concept analysis in cantonese aphasic oral discourse: external validation and monitoring chronic aphasia.
    Kong AP
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2011 Feb; 54(1):148-59. PubMed ID: 20719865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of reliability and validity of the Serbian Aphasia Screening Test.
    Vuković M; Milovanović T; Teovanović P; Stojanovik V
    PLoS One; 2024; 19(5):e0304565. PubMed ID: 38820406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Measurement of reading comprehension in aphasia with the RCBA.
    Van Demark AA; Lemmer EC; Drake ML
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1982 Aug; 47(3):288-91. PubMed ID: 7188558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Validity, reliability and sensitivity of the NORLA-6: Naming and oral reading for language in aphasia 6-point scale.
    Pitts LL; Hurwitz R; Lee JB; Carpenter J; Cherney LR
    Int J Speech Lang Pathol; 2018 Apr; 20(2):274-283. PubMed ID: 28425326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.