142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33059794)
1. Inclusion of Evidence-Based Breast Cancer Control Recommendations and Guidelines in State Comprehensive Cancer Control Plans.
Soori M; Platz EA; Kanarek N
Prev Chronic Dis; 2020 Oct; 17():E129. PubMed ID: 33059794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Inclusion of the US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation for Mammography in State Comprehensive Cancer Control Plans in the US.
Soori M; Platz EA; Brawley OW; Lawrence RS; Kanarek NF
JAMA Netw Open; 2022 May; 5(5):e229706. PubMed ID: 35499828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An update on tobacco control initiatives in comprehensive cancer control plans.
Dunne K; Henderson S; Stewart SL; Moore A; Hayes NS; Jordan J; Underwood JM
Prev Chronic Dis; 2013 Jul; 10():E107. PubMed ID: 23806802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evidence-based interventions and screening recommendations for colorectal cancer in comprehensive cancer control plans: a content analysis.
Townsend JS; Richardson LC; Steele CB; White DE
Prev Chronic Dis; 2009 Oct; 6(4):A127. PubMed ID: 19755003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Obstetrician-gynecologists' knowledge and opinions about the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) committee, the Women's Health Amendment, and the Affordable Care Act: national study after the release of the USPSTF 2009 Breast Cancer Screening Recommendation Statement.
Anderson BL; Urban RR; Pearlman M; Schulkin J
Prev Med; 2014 Feb; 59():79-82. PubMed ID: 24246966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Update in women's health.
Ganschow PS; Jacobs EA; Mackinnon J; Charney P
J Gen Intern Med; 2009 Jun; 24(6):765-70. PubMed ID: 19259751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Women's views about breast cancer prevention at mammography screening units and well women's clinics.
Rundle A; Iles S; Matheson K; Cahill LE; Forbes CC; Saint-Jacques N; Urquhart R; Younis T
Curr Oncol; 2020 Jun; 27(3):e336-e342. PubMed ID: 32669942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. United States Preventive Services Task Force screening mammography recommendations: science ignored.
Hendrick RE; Helvie MA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Feb; 196(2):W112-6. PubMed ID: 21257850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparing the Maryland Comprehensive Cancer Control Plan With Federal Cancer Prevention and Control Recommendations.
Fowler SL; Platz EA; Diener-West M; Hokenmaier S; Truss M; Lewis C; Kanarek NF
Prev Chronic Dis; 2015 Oct; 12():E163. PubMed ID: 26425867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Patient understanding of the revised USPSTF screening mammogram guidelines: need for development of patient decision aids.
Allen SV; Solberg Nes L; Marnach ML; Polga K; Jenkins SM; Files JA; Croghan IT; Ghosh K; Pruthi S
BMC Womens Health; 2012 Oct; 12():36. PubMed ID: 23051022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Human papillomavirus-related content in state and tribal comprehensive cancer control plans.
Steele CB; Thomas CN; Richardson LC
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2008; 17(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 18240976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Use of Evidence-Based Practices and Resources Among Comprehensive Cancer Control Programs.
Steele CB; Rose JM; Chovnick G; Townsend JS; Stockmyer CK; Fonseka J; Richardson LC
J Public Health Manag Pract; 2015; 21(5):441-8. PubMed ID: 24402431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Conflicting and changing breast cancer screening recommendations: survey study of a national sample of ob-gyns after the release of the 2009 USPSTF guidelines.
Anderson BL; Pearlman M; Griffin J; Schulkin J
J Healthc Qual; 2013; 35(4):25-35. PubMed ID: 23590634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An evaluation of cancer survivorship activities across national comprehensive cancer control programs.
Underwood JM; Lakhani N; Rohan E; Moore A; Stewart SL
J Cancer Surviv; 2015 Sep; 9(3):554-9. PubMed ID: 25732543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. United States Preventive Services Task Force recommendations on breast cancer screening.
Woolf SH
Cancer; 1992 Apr; 69(7 Suppl):1913-8. PubMed ID: 1544091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluating the role of public health in implementation of genomics-related recommendations: a case study of hereditary cancers using the CDC Science Impact Framework.
Green RF; Ari M; Kolor K; Dotson WD; Bowen S; Habarta N; Rodriguez JL; Richardson LC; Khoury MJ
Genet Med; 2019 Jan; 21(1):28-37. PubMed ID: 29907802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Screening for Breast Cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.
Siu AL;
Ann Intern Med; 2016 Feb; 164(4):279-96. PubMed ID: 26757170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Examining Breast Cancer Screening Behavior Among Southern Black Women After the 2009 US Preventive Services Task Force Mammography Guideline Revisions.
Farr DE; Brandt HM; Adams SA; Haynes VE; Gibson AS; Jackson DD; Rawlinson KC; Ureda JR; Hébert JR
J Community Health; 2020 Feb; 45(1):20-29. PubMed ID: 31385186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. LGBTQ+ cancer: priority or lip service? A qualitative content analysis of LGBTQ+ considerations in U.S. state, jurisdiction, and tribal comprehensive cancer control plans.
Waters AR; Bono MH; Ito Fukunaga M; Masud M; Mullins MA; Suk R; O'Leary MC; Adams SA; Ferrari RM; Wangen M; Odebunmi OO; Nash SH; Spees LP; Wheeler SB; Adsul P; Chebli P; Hirschey R; Studts JL; Seaman A; Lee M
Cancer Causes Control; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38796675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Re-examining current breast cancer screening: An analysis of the 2009 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force guidelines for breast cancer screening.
Beard C; Beard V
Women Health; 2016; 56(3):281-95. PubMed ID: 26362522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
