These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3306007)

  • 21. Too good to be true.
    Colt GH
    Harv Mag; 1983; 85(6):22-28, 54. PubMed ID: 11649472
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Integrity of research papers questioned.
    Culliton BJ
    Science; 1987 Jan; 235(4787):422-3. PubMed ID: 3798118
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Dingell v. Baltimore.
    Culliton BJ
    Science; 1989 Apr; 244(4903):412-4. PubMed ID: 2655079
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Science needs vigilance not vigilantes.
    Woolf PK
    JAMA; 1988 Oct; 260(13):1939-40. PubMed ID: 3418857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. NIH grapples with misconduct.
    Broad WJ
    Science; 1982 Jul; 217(4556):227. PubMed ID: 7089558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Scientific fraud probed at AAAS meeting.
    Smith RJ
    Science; 1985 Jun; 228(4705):1292-3. PubMed ID: 3832437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. What next in the Gallo case?
    Hamilton DP
    Science; 1991 Nov; 254(5034):944-5. PubMed ID: 1948080
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Fraud and misrepresentation in research--whose responsibility?
    Wigodsky HS
    IRB; 1984; 6(2):1-5. PubMed ID: 11649536
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Fraud squad moves in on universities.
    Cross M; Connor S; Anderson I
    New Sci; 1985 Jun; 106(1459):8. PubMed ID: 11655696
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Heat rises over UCSD 'misconduct' charge.
    Dalton R
    Nature; 1997 Feb; 385(6617):566. PubMed ID: 9024644
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Policing fraud and deceit: the legal aspects of misconduct in scientific inquiry.
    Protti M
    J Infor Ethics; 1996; 5(1):59-71. PubMed ID: 11653390
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. No misconduct or fraud in Baltimore case.
    Anderson A
    Nature; 1988 Dec; 336(6199):505. PubMed ID: 11644320
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Ensuring integrity in biomedical publication.
    Woolf PK
    JAMA; 1987 Dec; 258(23):3424-7. PubMed ID: 3682141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Fraudulent research in science: the responsibility of the peer reviewer.
    MacDermott RP
    Cancer Invest; 1991; 9(6):703-5. PubMed ID: 1747796
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. How charges of lab fraud grew into a cause célèbre.
    Hilts PJ
    N Y Times Web; 1991 Mar; ():C1, C5. PubMed ID: 11646839
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Fraudbusters back at NIH.
    Culliton BJ
    Science; 1990 Jun; 48(4963):1599. PubMed ID: 11653895
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Two critics of science revel in the role.
    Boffey PM
    N Y Times Web; 1988 Apr; ():C1. PubMed ID: 11646670
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. 'Ambition and impatience' blamed for fraud.
    Macilwain C
    Nature; 1996 Nov; 384(6604):6-7. PubMed ID: 8900256
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Biomedical information, peer review, and conflict of interest as they influence public health.
    Cantekin EI; McGuire TW; Potter RL
    JAMA; 1990 Mar; 263(10):1427-30. PubMed ID: 2078202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Conduct unbecoming?
    Weiss P
    N Y Times Mag; 1989 Oct; ():40-41, 68-69, 95. PubMed ID: 11650263
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.