These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33060797)
1. Accuracy of gross intraoperative margin assessment for breast cancer: experience since the SSO-ASTRO margin consensus guidelines. Nunez A; Jones V; Schulz-Costello K; Schmolze D Sci Rep; 2020 Oct; 10(1):17344. PubMed ID: 33060797 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Current margin practice and effect on re-excision rates following the publication of the SSO-ASTRO consensus and ABS consensus guidelines: a national prospective study of 2858 women undergoing breast-conserving therapy in the UK and Ireland. Tang SS; Kaptanis S; Haddow JB; Mondani G; Elsberger B; Tasoulis MK; Obondo C; Johns N; Ismail W; Syed A; Kissias P; Venn M; Sundaramoorthy S; Irwin G; Sami AS; Elfadl D; Baggaley A; Remoundos DD; Langlands F; Charalampoudis P; Barber Z; Hamilton-Burke WLS; Khan A; Sirianni C; Merker LAG; Saha S; Lane RA; Chopra S; Dupré S; Manning AT; St John ER; Musbahi A; Dlamini N; McArdle CL; Wright C; Murphy JO; Aggarwal R; Dordea M; Bosch K; Egbeare D; Osman H; Tayeh S; Razi F; Iqbal J; Ledwidge SFC; Albert V; Masannat Y Eur J Cancer; 2017 Oct; 84():315-324. PubMed ID: 28865259 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of SSO-ASTRO margin guidelines on reoperation rates following breast-conserving surgery. Monaghan A; Chapinal N; Hughes L; Baliski C Am J Surg; 2019 May; 217(5):862-867. PubMed ID: 30739736 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of Using Intra-Operative Ultrasound Guided Breast- Conserving Surgery on Positive Margin and Re-Excision Rates in Breast Cancer Cases with Current SSO/ASTRO Guidelines. Thanasitthichai S; Chaiwerawattana A; Phadhana-Anake O Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2016; 17(9):4463-4467. PubMed ID: 27797262 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Early Adoption of the SSO-ASTRO Consensus Guidelines on Margins for Breast-Conserving Surgery with Whole-Breast Irradiation in Stage I and II Invasive Breast Cancer: Initial Experience from Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. Rosenberger LH; Mamtani A; Fuzesi S; Stempel M; Eaton A; Morrow M; Gemignani ML Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Oct; 23(10):3239-46. PubMed ID: 27411549 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Role for intraoperative margin assessment in patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery. Cabioglu N; Hunt KK; Sahin AA; Kuerer HM; Babiera GV; Singletary SE; Whitman GJ; Ross MI; Ames FC; Feig BW; Buchholz TA; Meric-Bernstam F Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Apr; 14(4):1458-71. PubMed ID: 17260108 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of intraoperative gross examination of surgical margin status in women undergoing partial mastectomy for breast malignancy. Balch GC; Mithani SK; Simpson JF; Kelley MC Am Surg; 2005 Jan; 71(1):22-7; discussion 27-8. PubMed ID: 15757052 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. American Society of Breast Surgeons' Practice Patterns After Publication of the SSO-ASTRO-ASCO DCIS Consensus Guideline on Margins for Breast-Conserving Surgery With Whole-Breast Irradiation. DeSnyder SM; Hunt KK; Dong W; Smith BD; Moran MS; Chavez-MacGregor M; Shen Y; Kuerer HM; Lucci A Ann Surg Oncol; 2018 Oct; 25(10):2965-2974. PubMed ID: 29987598 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Revisiting surgical margins for invasive breast cancer patients treated with breast conservation therapy - Evidence for adopting a 1 mm negative width. Rakha EA; Quinn C; Masannat YA; Lee AHS; Tan PH; Karakatsanis A; Matrai ZT; Al Shaibani SHM; Gehani SA; Shaaban A; Khout H; Chagla L; Cserni G; Varga Z; Yong WF; Meattini I; Kulka J; Yang W; Tse GM; Pinder SE; Fox S; Dixon JM Eur J Surg Oncol; 2024 Oct; 50(10):108573. PubMed ID: 39243583 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Use of MarginProbe as an adjunct to standard operating procedure does not significantly reduce re-excision rates in breast conserving surgery. LeeVan E; Ho BT; Seto S; Shen J Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2020 Aug; 183(1):145-151. PubMed ID: 32607640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Factors influencing reoperation following breast-conserving surgery. Philpott A; Wong J; Elder K; Gorelik A; Mann GB; Skandarajah A ANZ J Surg; 2018 Sep; 88(9):922-927. PubMed ID: 29763991 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Re-excision rates after breast conserving surgery following the 2014 SSO-ASTRO guidelines. Heelan Gladden AA; Sams S; Gleisner A; Finlayson C; Kounalakis N; Hosokawa P; Brown R; Chong T; Mathes D; Murphy C Am J Surg; 2017 Dec; 214(6):1104-1109. PubMed ID: 28974314 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Adoption of SSO-ASTRO Margin Guidelines for Ductal Carcinoma in Situ: What Is the Impact on Use of Additional Surgery? Mamtani A; Romanoff A; Baser R; Vincent A; Morrow M; Gemignani ML Ann Surg Oncol; 2021 Jan; 28(1):295-302. PubMed ID: 32500343 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of Practice Patterns Following Publication of the SSO-ASTRO Consensus Guideline on Margins for Breast-Conserving Therapy in Stage I and II Invasive Breast Cancer. DeSnyder SM; Hunt KK; Smith BD; Moran MS; Klimberg S; Lucci A Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Oct; 22(10):3250-6. PubMed ID: 26202554 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Changes in Reoperation After Publication of Consensus Guidelines on Margins for Breast-Conserving Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Marinovich ML; Noguchi N; Morrow M; Houssami N JAMA Surg; 2020 Oct; 155(10):e203025. PubMed ID: 32857107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Intraoperative Margin Assessment in Wire-Localized Breast-Conserving Surgery for Invasive Cancer: A Population-Level Comparison of Techniques. Laws A; Brar MS; Bouchard-Fortier A; Leong B; Quan ML Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Oct; 23(10):3290-6. PubMed ID: 27406094 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Margin assessment before intraoperative radiotherapy during breast conserving surgery-Does the addition of MarginProbe decrease the need for addition of fractionated whole breast radiation? Hermann N; Haas I; Malinger P; Kaufman Z Breast J; 2020 Jul; 26(7):1343-1346. PubMed ID: 32367618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessing Resection Margin Status in Breast-conserving Surgery Specimens: Comparison Among Gross Evaluation, Frozen Section Analysis, and Permanent Section Diagnosis in 725 Patients With Breast Cancer. DO J; Chu J; Ahn J; Bae GE; Lee SH; Kim HS; DO SI Anticancer Res; 2022 Sep; 42(9):4453-4460. PubMed ID: 36039453 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of the SSO/ASTRO Margin Reexcision Guidelines on Costs Associated with Breast-Conserving Surgery. Baliski CR; Pataky RE Ann Surg Oncol; 2017 Mar; 24(3):632-637. PubMed ID: 27882469 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Was Reexcision Less Frequent for Patients with Lobular Breast Cancer After Publication of the SSO-ASTRO Margin Guidelines? Mamtani A; Zabor EC; Rosenberger LH; Stempel M; Gemignani ML; Morrow M Ann Surg Oncol; 2019 Nov; 26(12):3856-3862. PubMed ID: 31456094 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]