These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3306305)

  • 1. Estimation of tissue parameters derived from reflected ultrasound.
    Shiina T; Ikeda K; Saito M
    Med Prog Technol; 1987; 12(3-4):185-95. PubMed ID: 3306305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Estimating ultrasonic parameters of biological tissue by adaptive filtering technique.
    Shiina T; Ikeda K; Saito M
    Front Med Biol Eng; 1988; 1(1):29-43. PubMed ID: 3153657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On estimating the number density of random scatterers from backscattered acoustic signals.
    Sleefe GE; Lele PP
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1988; 14(8):709-27. PubMed ID: 3062865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Estimate of attenuation coefficient for ultrasonic tissue characterization using time-varying state-space model.
    Shih LY; Barnes CW; Ferrari LA
    Ultrason Imaging; 1988 Apr; 10(2):90-109. PubMed ID: 3057715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Transducer characterization from pressure amplitude distribution measurements using a Kalman filter as parameter estimation algorithm.
    Linssen FM; Hoeks AP
    Ultrason Imaging; 1990 Oct; 12(4):309-23. PubMed ID: 2256230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A novel power spectrum calculation method using phase-compensation and weighted averaging for the estimation of ultrasound attenuation.
    Heo SW; Kim H
    Ultrasonics; 2010 May; 50(6):592-9. PubMed ID: 20083291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Variation of acoustic attenuation coefficient slope estimates for in vivo liver.
    Kuc R; Taylor KJ
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1982; 8(4):403-12. PubMed ID: 7112726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ultrasonic differentiation of intraocular melanomas: parameters and estimation methods.
    Romijn RL; Thijssen JM; Oosterveld BJ; Verbeek AM
    Ultrason Imaging; 1991 Jan; 13(1):27-55. PubMed ID: 1998247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ultrasound attenuation estimation using the LMSE filters and the median filter.
    Jang HS; Lee MH; Park SB
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1988; 14(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 3347963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Simulation of ultrasonic pulse propagation, distortion, and attenuation in the human chest wall.
    Mast TD; Hinkelman LM; Metlay LA; Orr MJ; Waag RC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Dec; 106(6):3665-77. PubMed ID: 10615705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. In vivo measurement of attenuation.
    Ferrari L; Jones JP; Gonzalez VM
    Ultrasonics; 1986 Mar; 24(2):66-72. PubMed ID: 3952885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A new method for estimating the acoustic attenuation coefficient of tissue from reflected ultrasonic signals.
    Lai D; Saito M
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1989; 8(1):107-10. PubMed ID: 18230507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Time domain attenuation estimation method from ultrasonic backscattered signals.
    Ghoshal G; Oelze ML
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Jul; 132(1):533-43. PubMed ID: 22779499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ultrasound attenuation estimation in soft tissue using the entropy difference of pulsed echoes between two adjacent envelope segments.
    Jang HS; Song TK; Park SB
    Ultrason Imaging; 1988 Oct; 10(4):248-64. PubMed ID: 3074549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Suppression of front and back surface reflections in ultrasonic analytic-signal responses from composites.
    Zilidou M; Smith RA; Wilcox PD
    Ultrasonics; 2022 Dec; 126():106815. PubMed ID: 35933809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ultrasonic tissue characterisation and echographic imaging.
    Thijssen JM
    Phys Med Biol; 1989 Nov; 34(11):1667-74. PubMed ID: 2685836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Identifying ultrasonic scattering sites from three-dimensional impedance maps.
    Mamou J; Oelze ML; O'Brien WD; Zachary JF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Jan; 117(1):413-23. PubMed ID: 15704434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Estimating the spatial autocorrelation function for ultrasound scatterers in isotropic media.
    Chen JF; Zagzebski JA; Dong F; Madsen EL
    Med Phys; 1998 May; 25(5):648-55. PubMed ID: 9608474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Lower Bound on Estimation Variance of the Ultrasonic Attenuation Coefficient Using the Spectral-Difference Reference-phantom Method.
    Samimi K; Varghese T
    Ultrason Imaging; 2017 May; 39(3):151-171. PubMed ID: 28425388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Nonlinear propagation effects on broadband attenuation measurements and its implications for ultrasonic tissue characterization.
    D'hooge J; Bijnens B; Nuyts J; Gorce JM; Friboulet D; Thoen J; Van de Werf F; Suetens P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Aug; 106(2):1126-33. PubMed ID: 10462815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.