These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33064196)
1. Changes in accommodation dynamics after alcohol consumption, for two different doses. Casares-López M; Castro-Torres JJ; Ortiz-Peregrina S; Ortiz C; Anera RG Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2021 Apr; 259(4):919-928. PubMed ID: 33064196 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of the influence of alcohol and cannabis on the dynamics of the accommodative response. Casares-López M; Ortiz-Peregrina S; Ortiz C; Castro-Torres JJ; Anera RG Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2023 Aug; 261(8):2281-2289. PubMed ID: 36976357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Static and dynamic measurements of accommodation in individuals with down syndrome. Anderson HA; Manny RE; Glasser A; Stuebing KK Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Jan; 52(1):310-7. PubMed ID: 20739471 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accommodative dynamics and attention: the influence of manipulating attentional capacity on accommodative lag and variability. Redondo B; Vera J; Molina R; Davies LN; Jiménez R Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2020 Jul; 40(4):510-518. PubMed ID: 32367611 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Age-related changes in accommodative dynamics from preschool to adulthood. Anderson HA; Glasser A; Manny RE; Stuebing KK Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2010 Jan; 51(1):614-22. PubMed ID: 19684002 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Experimental investigation of accommodation in eyes fit with multifocal contact lenses using a clinical auto-refractor. Altoaimi BH; Kollbaum P; Meyer D; Bradley A Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2018 Mar; 38(2):152-163. PubMed ID: 29315718 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of amplitude and starting point on accommodative dynamics in humans. Kasthurirangan S; Glasser A Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Sep; 46(9):3463-72. PubMed ID: 16123453 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of amplitude, starting point, and age on first- and second-order dynamics of Edinger-Westphal-stimulated accommodation in rhesus monkeys. Baumeister M; Wendt M; Glasser A Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2010 Oct; 51(10):5378-90. PubMed ID: 20484591 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accommodation and its role in myopia progression and control with soft contact lenses. Cheng X; Xu J; Brennan NA Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2019 May; 39(3):162-171. PubMed ID: 30994197 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Changes in dynamics of accommodation after accommodative facility training in myopes and emmetropes. Allen PM; Charman WN; Radhakrishnan H Vision Res; 2010 May; 50(10):947-55. PubMed ID: 20304003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of manipulating the vergence/accommodation and image size mismatches of the ±2D flipper test on the frequency and precision of accommodative facility. Vera J; Redondo B; Martínez-Tovar JM; Molina R; Koulieris GA; Allen PM; Jiménez R Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2023 Jul; 43(4):660-667. PubMed ID: 37002939 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Age related changes in accommodative dynamics in humans. Kasthurirangan S; Glasser A Vision Res; 2006 Apr; 46(8-9):1507-19. PubMed ID: 16384590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Stimulus Unpredictability in Time, Magnitude, and Direction on Accommodation. Otero C; Aldaba M; Díaz-Doutón F; Vera-Diaz FA; Pujol J Optom Vis Sci; 2019 Jun; 96(6):424-433. PubMed ID: 31107844 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]