These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33064376)

  • 1. Comparison of OneShape, 2Shape and One Curve endodontic instruments for debris and irrigant extrusion.
    Saricam E; Kayaoglu G
    Dent Med Probl; 2020; 57(3):255-259. PubMed ID: 33064376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessment of apically extruded debris and irrigant produced by different nickel-titanium instrument systems.
    Küçükyilmaz E; Savas S; Saygili G; Uysal B
    Braz Oral Res; 2015; 29():1-6. PubMed ID: 25387860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of a glide path on apical extrusion of debris during canal preparation using single-file systems in curved canals.
    Topçuoğlu HS; Düzgün S; Akpek F; Topçuoğlu G; Aktı A
    Int Endod J; 2016 Jun; 49(6):599-603. PubMed ID: 26084620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of Apically Extruded Debris and Irrigant Produced by Different Nickel-Titanium Instrument Systems in Primary Teeth.
    Kucukyilmaz E; Savas S; Saygili G; Uysal B
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2015 Nov; 16(11):864-8. PubMed ID: 26718292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of Different Glide Path Files on Apical Debris Extrusion in Curved Root Canals.
    Gunes B; Yesildal Yeter K
    J Endod; 2018 Jul; 44(7):1191-1194. PubMed ID: 29884338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Apically-extruded debris using the ProTaper system.
    Azar NG; Ebrahimi G
    Aust Endod J; 2005 Apr; 31(1):21-3. PubMed ID: 15881729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of coronal flaring on apical extrusion of debris during root canal instrumentation using single-file systems.
    Topçuoğlu HS; Üstün Y; Akpek F; Aktı A; Topçuoğlu G
    Int Endod J; 2016 Sep; 49(9):884-889. PubMed ID: 26283644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Influence of Cervical Preflaring on the Amount of Apically Extruded Debris after Root Canal Preparation Using Different Instrumentation Systems.
    Borges ÁH; Pereira TM; Porto AN; de Araújo Estrela CR; Miranda Pedro FL; Aranha AM; Guedes OA
    J Endod; 2016 Mar; 42(3):465-9. PubMed ID: 26614016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quantitative evaluation of apically extruded debris with different single-file systems: Reciproc, F360 and OneShape versus Mtwo.
    Bürklein S; Benten S; Schäfer E
    Int Endod J; 2014 May; 47(5):405-9. PubMed ID: 23889673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of apical extrusion of debris and irrigant using two new reciprocating and one continuous rotation single file systems.
    Nayak G; Singh I; Shetty S; Dahiya S
    J Dent (Tehran); 2014 May; 11(3):302-9. PubMed ID: 25628665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of apically extruded debris produced by the self-adjusting file system.
    De-Deus GA; Nogueira Leal Silva EJ; Moreira EJ; de Almeida Neves A; Belladonna FG; Tameirão M
    J Endod; 2014 Apr; 40(4):526-9. PubMed ID: 24666904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of cervical preflaring on the apical debris extrusion of single or multiple rotary Ni-Ti files.
    Gunes B; Yeter KY
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2020 Apr; 23(4):510-514. PubMed ID: 32246658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of apically extruded debris and irrigant using different file systems.
    Kütük B; Akpınar KE; Altunbaş D
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2017 Dec; 20(12):1555-1560. PubMed ID: 29378986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quantitative evaluation of apical extrusion of debris and irrigants using four rotary instrumentation systems: an in vitro study.
    Nagaveni SA; Balakoti KR; Smita K; Ratnakar P; Satish SV; Aravind T
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Nov; 14(6):1065-9. PubMed ID: 24858752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of apically extruded debris during root canal preparation in primary molar teeth using three different rotary systems and hand files.
    Topçuoğlu G; Topçuoğlu HS; Akpek F
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2016 Sep; 26(5):357-63. PubMed ID: 26538300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of Different Kinematics on Apical Extrusion of Irrigant and Debris during Canal Preparation Using K3XF Instruments.
    Toyoğlu M; Altunbaş D
    J Endod; 2017 Sep; 43(9):1565-1568. PubMed ID: 28735794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Apically extruded debris with three contemporary Ni-Ti instrumentation systems: an ex vivo comparative study.
    Logani A; Shah N
    Indian J Dent Res; 2008; 19(3):182-5. PubMed ID: 18797091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Apically extruded debris with reciprocating single-file and full-sequence rotary instrumentation systems.
    Bürklein S; Schäfer E
    J Endod; 2012 Jun; 38(6):850-2. PubMed ID: 22595125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of debris extruded apically during the removal of root canal filling material using ProTaper, D-RaCe, and R-Endo rotary nickel-titanium retreatment instruments and hand files.
    Topçuoğlu HS; Aktı A; Tuncay Ö; Dinçer AN; Düzgün S; Topçuoğlu G
    J Endod; 2014 Dec; 40(12):2066-9. PubMed ID: 25443282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of apically extruded debris after large apical preparations by full-sequence rotary and single-file reciprocating systems.
    Silva EJ; Carapiá MF; Lopes RM; Belladonna FG; Senna PM; Souza EM; De-Deus G
    Int Endod J; 2016 Jul; 49(7):700-5. PubMed ID: 26174577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.