These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33064731)

  • 1. Accuracy evaluation of 3D printed interim prosthesis fabrication using a CBCT scanning based digital model.
    Kim YH; Jung BY; Han SS; Woo CW
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(10):e0240508. PubMed ID: 33064731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. 3D and 2D marginal fit of pressed and CAD/CAM lithium disilicate crowns made from digital and conventional impressions.
    Anadioti E; Aquilino SA; Gratton DG; Holloway JA; Denry I; Thomas GW; Qian F
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Dec; 23(8):610-7. PubMed ID: 24995593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of the marginal fit of crowns fabricated with digital and conventional methods.
    Ng J; Ruse D; Wyatt C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):555-60. PubMed ID: 24630399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of a new support design on the marginal and internal gap of additively manufactured interim crowns using direct light deposition technology.
    Khanlar LN; Francis C; Basir Barmak A; Rios ALS; Ashtiani RE; Zandinejad A
    J Prosthodont; 2024 Feb; 33(2):188-194. PubMed ID: 36810925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of intraoral scanning and CBCT to generate digital and 3D-printed casts by fused deposition modeling and digital light processing.
    de Freitas BN; Mendonça LM; Cruvinel PB; de Lacerda TJ; Leite FGJ; Oliveira-Santos C; Tirapelli C
    J Dent; 2023 Jan; 128():104387. PubMed ID: 36496106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of digital impression techniques on the adaption of ceramic partial crowns in vitro.
    Schaefer O; Decker M; Wittstock F; Kuepper H; Guentsch A
    J Dent; 2014 Jun; 42(6):677-83. PubMed ID: 24508541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Positional trueness of abutments by using a digital die-merging protocol compared with complete arch direct digital scans and conventional dental impressions.
    Jelicich A; Scialabba R; Lee SJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Feb; 131(2):293-300. PubMed ID: 35430047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of abutment tooth geometry on the accuracy of conventional and digital methods of obtaining dental impressions.
    Carbajal Mejía JB; Wakabayashi K; Nakamura T; Yatani H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Sep; 118(3):392-399. PubMed ID: 28222873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Can lithium disilicate ceramic crowns be fabricated on the basis of CBCT data?
    Kauling AEC; Keul C; Erdelt K; Kühnisch J; Güth JF
    Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Oct; 23(10):3739-3748. PubMed ID: 30725188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of the Fit of Lithium Disilicate Crowns made from Conventional, Digital, or Conventional/Digital Techniques.
    Al Hamad KQ; Al Rashdan BA; Al Omari WM; Baba NZ
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e580-e586. PubMed ID: 30091168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Marginal fit of CAD-CAM monolithic zirconia crowns fabricated by using cone beam computed tomography scans.
    Kale E; Cilli M; Özçelik TB; Yilmaz B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 May; 123(5):731-737. PubMed ID: 31653403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fitting accuracy of zirconia single crowns produced via digital and conventional impressions-a clinical comparative study.
    Rödiger M; Heinitz A; Bürgers R; Rinke S
    Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Mar; 21(2):579-587. PubMed ID: 27469102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prosthesis accuracy of fit on 3D-printed casts versus stone casts: A comparative study in the anterior maxilla.
    Abdeen L; Chen YW; Kostagianni A; Finkelman M; Papathanasiou A; Chochlidakis K; Papaspyridakos P
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2022 Dec; 34(8):1238-1246. PubMed ID: 36415927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical evaluation of all-ceramic crowns fabricated from intraoral digital impressions based on the principle of active wavefront sampling.
    Syrek A; Reich G; Ranftl D; Klein C; Cerny B; Brodesser J
    J Dent; 2010 Jul; 38(7):553-9. PubMed ID: 20381576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of accuracy and reproducibility of casts made by digital and conventional methods.
    Cho SH; Schaefer O; Thompson GA; Guentsch A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Apr; 113(4):310-5. PubMed ID: 25682531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Marginal and internal fit of zirconia copings obtained using different digital scanning methods.
    Pedroche LO; Bernardes SR; Leão MP; Kintopp CC; Correr GM; Ornaghi BP; Gonzaga CC
    Braz Oral Res; 2016 Oct; 30(1):e113. PubMed ID: 27737366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Marginal and internal fit of metal-ceramic crowns fabricated with a new laser melting technology.
    Quante K; Ludwig K; Kern M
    Dent Mater; 2008 Oct; 24(10):1311-5. PubMed ID: 18384869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy of three digital workflows for implant abutment and crown fabrication using a digital measuring technique.
    Zeller S; Guichet D; Kontogiorgos E; Nagy WW
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Feb; 121(2):276-284. PubMed ID: 30396709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of the fit of zirconia copings fabricated by direct and indirect digital scanning procedures.
    Lee B; Oh KC; Haam D; Lee JH; Moon HS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Aug; 120(2):225-231. PubMed ID: 29428522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of marginal fit of CAD/CAM restorations fabricated through cone beam computerized tomography and laboratory scanner data.
    Şeker E; Ozcelik TB; Rathi N; Yilmaz B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Jan; 115(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 26518986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.