115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33065197)
1. Comparing dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion post-processing with different clinically available software among patients affected of a high-grade glioma.
Delacoste ESL; Delattre BNDMA; Wanyanga P; Vargas MI
J Neuroradiol; 2022 Nov; 49(6):412-420. PubMed ID: 33065197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of clinically available dynamic susceptibility contrast post processing software to differentiate progression from pseudoprogression in post-treatment high grade glioma.
Nierobisch N; Ludovichetti R; Kadali K; Fierstra J; Hüllner M; Michels L; Achangwa NR; Alcaide-Leon P; Weller M; Kulcsar Z; Hainc N
Eur J Radiol; 2023 Oct; 167():111076. PubMed ID: 37666072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reproducibility of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI in the study of brain gliomas: a comparison of data obtained using different commercial software.
Conte GM; Castellano A; Altabella L; Iadanza A; Cadioli M; Falini A; Anzalone N
Radiol Med; 2017 Apr; 122(4):294-302. PubMed ID: 28070841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Probing the glioma microvasculature: a case series of the comparison between perfusion MRI and intraoperative high-frame-rate ultrafast Doppler ultrasound.
Alafandi A; Tbalvandany SS; Arzanforoosh F; van Der Voort SR; Incekara F; Verhoef L; Warnert EAH; Kruizinga P; Smits M
Eur Radiol Exp; 2024 Jan; 8(1):13. PubMed ID: 38273190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reliable estimation of microvascular flow patterns in patients with disrupted blood-brain barrier using dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI.
Hansen MB; Tietze A; Kalpathy-Cramer J; Gerstner ER; Batchelor TT; Østergaard L; Mouridsen K
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Aug; 46(2):537-549. PubMed ID: 27902858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of Different Post-Processing Algorithms for Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast Perfusion Imaging of Cerebral Gliomas.
Kudo K; Uwano I; Hirai T; Murakami R; Nakamura H; Fujima N; Yamashita F; Goodwin J; Higuchi S; Sasaki M
Magn Reson Med Sci; 2017 Apr; 16(2):129-136. PubMed ID: 27646457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dynamic susceptibility contrast and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI characteristics to distinguish microcystic meningiomas from traditional Grade I meningiomas and high-grade gliomas.
Hussain NS; Moisi MD; Keogh B; McCullough BJ; Rostad S; Newell D; Gwinn R; Foltz G; Mayberg M; Aguedan B; Good V; Fouke SJ
J Neurosurg; 2017 Apr; 126(4):1220-1226. PubMed ID: 27285539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dynamic contrast-enhanced and dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion MR imaging for glioma grading: Preliminary comparison of vessel compartment and permeability parameters using hotspot and histogram analysis.
Santarosa C; Castellano A; Conte GM; Cadioli M; Iadanza A; Terreni MR; Franzin A; Bello L; Caulo M; Falini A; Anzalone N
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Jun; 85(6):1147-56. PubMed ID: 27161065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Differentiation of grade II/III and grade IV glioma by combining "T1 contrast-enhanced brain perfusion imaging" and susceptibility-weighted quantitative imaging.
Saini J; Gupta PK; Sahoo P; Singh A; Patir R; Ahlawat S; Beniwal M; Thennarasu K; Santosh V; Gupta RK
Neuroradiology; 2018 Jan; 60(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 29090331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Consistency of normalized cerebral blood volume values in glioblastoma using different leakage correction algorithms on dynamic susceptibility contrast magnetic resonance imaging data without and with preload.
Hedderich D; Kluge A; Pyka T; Zimmer C; Kirschke JS; Wiestler B; Preibisch C
J Neuroradiol; 2019 Feb; 46(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 29753641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Improved Leakage Correction for Single-Echo Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast Perfusion MRI Estimates of Relative Cerebral Blood Volume in High-Grade Gliomas by Accounting for Bidirectional Contrast Agent Exchange.
Leu K; Boxerman JL; Cloughesy TF; Lai A; Nghiemphu PL; Liau LM; Pope WB; Ellingson BM
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2016 Aug; 37(8):1440-6. PubMed ID: 27079371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prospective comparative diagnostic accuracy evaluation of dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) vs. dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) MR perfusion in differentiating tumor recurrence from radiation necrosis in treated high-grade gliomas.
Zakhari N; Taccone MS; Torres CH; Chakraborty S; Sinclair J; Woulfe J; Jansen GH; Cron GO; Thornhill RE; McInnes MDF; Nguyen TB
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Aug; 50(2):573-582. PubMed ID: 30614146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reliability of dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion metrics in pre- and post-treatment glioma.
Kouwenberg V; van Santwijk L; Meijer FJA; Henssen D
Cancer Imaging; 2022 Jun; 22(1):28. PubMed ID: 35715866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Tumor recurrence versus treatment effects in glioma: A comparative study of three dimensional pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling and dynamic susceptibility contrast imaging.
Xu Q; Liu Q; Ge H; Ge X; Wu J; Qu J; Xu K
Medicine (Baltimore); 2017 Dec; 96(50):e9332. PubMed ID: 29390403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Permeability measurement using dynamic susceptibility contrast magnetic resonance imaging enhances differential diagnosis of primary central nervous system lymphoma from glioblastoma.
Lee JY; Bjørnerud A; Park JE; Lee BE; Kim JH; Kim HS
Eur Radiol; 2019 Oct; 29(10):5539-5548. PubMed ID: 30877463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Amide proton transfer-weighted MRI in the clinical setting - correlation with dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion in the post-treatment imaging of adult glioma patients at 3T.
Friismose AI; Markovic L; Nguyen N; Gerke O; Schulz MK; Mussmann BR
Radiography (Lond); 2022 Feb; 28(1):95-101. PubMed ID: 34509365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Systematic assessment of multi-echo dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI using a digital reference object.
Stokes AM; Semmineh NB; Nespodzany A; Bell LC; Quarles CC
Magn Reson Med; 2020 Jan; 83(1):109-123. PubMed ID: 31400035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of three different MR perfusion techniques and MR spectroscopy for multiparametric assessment in distinguishing recurrent high-grade gliomas from stable disease.
Seeger A; Braun C; Skardelly M; Paulsen F; Schittenhelm J; Ernemann U; Bisdas S
Acad Radiol; 2013 Dec; 20(12):1557-65. PubMed ID: 24200483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Differentiating between Central Nervous System Lymphoma and High-grade Glioma Using Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast and Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging with Histogram Analysis.
Murayama K; Nishiyama Y; Hirose Y; Abe M; Ohyu S; Ninomiya A; Fukuba T; Katada K; Toyama H
Magn Reson Med Sci; 2018 Jan; 17(1):42-49. PubMed ID: 28515410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Application of histogram analysis for the evaluation of vascular permeability in glioma by the K2 parameter obtained with the dynamic susceptibility contrast method: Comparisons with Ktrans obtained with the dynamic contrast enhance method and cerebral blood volume.
Taoka T; Kawai H; Nakane T; Hori S; Ochi T; Miyasaka T; Sakamoto M; Kichikawa K; Naganawa S
Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Sep; 34(7):896-901. PubMed ID: 27109485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
