132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33065759)
1. The impact of paradigm and stringent analysis parameters on measuring a net conditioned pain modulation effect: A test, retest, control study.
Cummins TM; McMahon SB; Bannister K
Eur J Pain; 2021 Feb; 25(2):415-429. PubMed ID: 33065759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Short-term test-retest-reliability of conditioned pain modulation using the cold-heat-pain method in healthy subjects and its correlation to parameters of standardized quantitative sensory testing.
Gehling J; Mainka T; Vollert J; Pogatzki-Zahn EM; Maier C; Enax-Krumova EK
BMC Neurol; 2016 Aug; 16():125. PubMed ID: 27495743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reliability of the conditioned pain modulation paradigm across three anatomical sites.
Nuwailati R; Curatolo M; LeResche L; Ramsay DS; Spiekerman C; Drangsholt M
Scand J Pain; 2020 Apr; 20(2):283-296. PubMed ID: 31812949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessment of CPM reliability: quantification of the within-subject reliability of 10 different protocols.
Vaegter HB; Petersen KK; Mørch CD; Imai Y; Arendt-Nielsen L
Scand J Pain; 2018 Oct; 18(4):729-737. PubMed ID: 30007061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Development of a new bed-side-test assessing conditioned pain modulation: a test-retest reliability study.
Larsen JB; Madeleine P; Arendt-Nielsen L
Scand J Pain; 2019 Jul; 19(3):565-574. PubMed ID: 30920956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Determining Real Change in Conditioned Pain Modulation: A Repeated Measures Study in Healthy Volunteers.
Kennedy DL; Kemp HI; Wu C; Ridout DA; Rice ASC
J Pain; 2020; 21(5-6):708-721. PubMed ID: 31715262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Test-retest reliability of pressure pain threshold and heat pain threshold as test stimuli for evaluation of conditioned pain modulation.
Kovacevic M; Klicov L; Vuklis D; Neblett R; Knezevic A
Neurophysiol Clin; 2021 Oct; 51(5):433-442. PubMed ID: 34304974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Psychophysical or spinal reflex measures when assessing conditioned pain modulation?
Lie MU; Petriu E; Matre D; Hansson P; Andersen OK; Zwart JA; Nilsen KB
Eur J Pain; 2019 Nov; 23(10):1879-1889. PubMed ID: 31359580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Conditioned pain modulation and offset analgesia: Influence of sex, sex hormone levels and menstrual cycle on the magnitude and retest reliability in healthy participants.
Vollert J; Trewartha N; Kemkowski D; Cremer AF; Zahn PK; Segelcke D; Pogatzki-Zahn EM
Eur J Pain; 2022 Oct; 26(9):1938-1949. PubMed ID: 35856832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Delayed effects of attention on pain sensitivity and conditioned pain modulation.
Hoegh M; Seminowicz DA; Graven-Nielsen T
Eur J Pain; 2019 Nov; 23(10):1850-1862. PubMed ID: 31343803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparing test-retest reliability and magnitude of conditioned pain modulation using different combinations of test and conditioning stimuli.
Imai Y; Petersen KK; Mørch CD; Arendt Nielsen L
Somatosens Mot Res; 2016; 33(3-4):169-177. PubMed ID: 27650216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of repeated conditioning pain modulation in healthy volunteers.
Hoegh M; Petersen KK; Graven-Nielsen T
Eur J Pain; 2018 Nov; 22(10):1833-1843. PubMed ID: 29956411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. CPM Test-Retest Reliability: "Standard" vs "Single Test-Stimulus" Protocols.
Granovsky Y; Miller-Barmak A; Goldstein O; Sprecher E; Yarnitsky D
Pain Med; 2016 Mar; 17(3):521-529. PubMed ID: 26272736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Test-Retest Instability of Temporal Summation and Conditioned Pain Modulation Measures in Older Adults.
Naugle KM; Ohlman T; Wind B; Miller L
Pain Med; 2020 Nov; 21(11):2863-2876. PubMed ID: 33083842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Test-retest reliability of quantitative sensory testing for mechanical somatosensory and pain modulation assessment of masticatory structures.
Costa YM; Morita-Neto O; de Araújo-Júnior EN; Sampaio FA; Conti PC; Bonjardim LR
J Oral Rehabil; 2017 Mar; 44(3):197-204. PubMed ID: 28008644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reliability of conditioned pain modulation in healthy individuals and chronic pain patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Nuwailati R; Bobos P; Drangsholt M; Curatolo M
Scand J Pain; 2022 Apr; 22(2):262-278. PubMed ID: 35142147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. User-independent assessment of conditioning pain modulation by cuff pressure algometry.
Graven-Nielsen T; Izumi M; Petersen KK; Arendt-Nielsen L
Eur J Pain; 2017 Mar; 21(3):552-561. PubMed ID: 27859944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A tonic heat test stimulus yields a larger and more reliable conditioned pain modulation effect compared to a phasic heat test stimulus.
Lie MU; Matre D; Hansson P; Stubhaug A; Zwart JA; Nilsen KB
Pain Rep; 2017 Nov; 2(6):e626. PubMed ID: 29392240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Conditioned pain modulation is affected by occlusion cuff conditioning stimulus intensity, but not duration.
Smith A; Pedler A
Eur J Pain; 2018 Jan; 22(1):94-102. PubMed ID: 28805288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reliability of conditioned pain modulation: a systematic review.
Kennedy DL; Kemp HI; Ridout D; Yarnitsky D; Rice ASC
Pain; 2016 Nov; 157(11):2410-2419. PubMed ID: 27559835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]