These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33066692)
21. Comparison of naturally and synthetically baited spruce beetle trapping systems in the central Rocky Mountains. Hansen EM; Vandygriff JC; Cain RJ; Wakarchuk D J Econ Entomol; 2006 Apr; 99(2):373-82. PubMed ID: 16686135 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Relative performance of Lindgren multiple-funnel, Intercept panel, and Colossus pipe traps in catching Cerambycidae and associated species in the southeastern United States. Miller DR; Crowe CM J Econ Entomol; 2011 Dec; 104(6):1934-41. PubMed ID: 22299355 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison of Trap Designs for Detection of Euwallacea nr. fornicatus and Other Scolytinae (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) That Vector Fungal Pathogens of Avocado Trees in Florida. Kendra PE; Montgomery WS; Narvaez TI; Carrillo D J Econ Entomol; 2020 Apr; 113(2):980-987. PubMed ID: 31742602 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Influence of temperature on spring flight initiation for southwestern ponderosa pine bark beetles (Coleoptera: Curculionidae, Scolytinae). Gaylord ML; Williams KK; Hofstetter RW; McMillin JD; Degomez TE; Wagner MR Environ Entomol; 2008 Feb; 37(1):57-69. PubMed ID: 18348797 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Effects of habitat type and trap placement on captures of bark (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) and longhorned (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) beetles in semiochemical-baited traps. Dodds KJ J Econ Entomol; 2011 Jun; 104(3):879-88. PubMed ID: 21735907 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Ipsenol, Ipsdienol, Ethanol, and α-Pinene: Trap Lure Blend for Cerambycidae and Buprestidae (Coleoptera) in Pine Forests of Eastern North America. Miller DR; Crowe CM; Dodds KJ; Galligan LD; de Groot P; Hoebeke ER; Mayfield AE; Poland TM; Raffa KF; Sweeney JD J Econ Entomol; 2015 Aug; 108(4):1837-51. PubMed ID: 26470326 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of arboreal beetle catches in wet and dry collection cups with Lindgren multiple funnel traps. Miller DR; Duerr DA J Econ Entomol; 2008 Feb; 101(1):107-13. PubMed ID: 18330123 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Trapping liquids may bias the results of beetle diversity assessment. Nakládal O; Havránková E; Zumr V PeerJ; 2023; 11():e16531. PubMed ID: 38089907 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Verbenone Affects the Behavior of Insect Predators and Other Saproxylic Beetles Differently: Trials Using Pheromone-Baited Bark Beetle Traps. Bracalini M; Florenzano GT; Panzavolta T Insects; 2024 Apr; 15(4):. PubMed ID: 38667390 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Kairomonal response by four Monochamus species (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) to bark beetle pheromones. Allison JD; Borden JH; McIntosh RL; de Groot P; Gries R J Chem Ecol; 2001 Apr; 27(4):633-46. PubMed ID: 11446290 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A new approach to determine the capture conditions of bark beetles in pheromone-baited traps. Ozcan GE; Cicek O; Enez K; Yildiz M Biotechnol Biotechnol Equip; 2014 Nov; 28(6):1057-1064. PubMed ID: 26019592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Potential of yellow sticky traps for lady beetle survey in cotton. Parajulee MN; Slosser JE J Econ Entomol; 2003 Feb; 96(1):239-45. PubMed ID: 12650368 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Efficacy of two insecticides for protecting loblolly pines (Pinus taeda L.) from subcortical beetles (Coleoptera: Curculionidae and Cerambycidae). Burke JL; Hanula JL; Horn S; Audley JP; Gandhi KJ Pest Manag Sci; 2012 Jul; 68(7):1048-52. PubMed ID: 22359265 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Treating panel traps with a fluoropolymer enhances their efficiency in capturing cerambycid beetles. Graham EE; Mitchell RF; Reagel PF; Barbour JD; Millar JG; Hanks LM J Econ Entomol; 2010 Jun; 103(3):641-7. PubMed ID: 20568608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Occurrence of spruce bark beetles in forest stands at different levels of air pollution stress. Grodzki W; McManus M; Knízek M; Meshkova V; Mihalciuc V; Novotny J; Turcani M; Slobodyan Y Environ Pollut; 2004 Jul; 130(1):73-83. PubMed ID: 15046842 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Disruption by conophthorin of the kairomonal response of sawyer beetles to bark beetle pheromones. Morewood WD; Simmonds KE; Gries R; Allison JD; Borden JH J Chem Ecol; 2003 Sep; 29(9):2115-29. PubMed ID: 14584679 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Trapping of Aethina tumida Murray (Coleoptera: Nitidulidae) from Apis mellifera L. (Hymenoptera: Apidae) colonies with an in-hive baited trap. Torto B; Arbogast RT; Van Engelsdorp D; Willms S; Purcell D; Boucias D; Tumlinson JH; Teal PE Environ Entomol; 2007 Oct; 36(5):1018-24. PubMed ID: 18284723 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Evaluation of two prototype traps and existing trap designs for captures of Japanese beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Alm SR; Dawson CG J Econ Entomol; 2003 Apr; 96(2):453-5. PubMed ID: 14994814 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Influence of Trap Height and Bait Type on Abundance and Species Diversity of Cerambycid Beetles Captured in Forests of East-Central Illinois. Schmeelk TC; Millar JG; Hanks LM J Econ Entomol; 2016 Aug; 109(4):1750-7. PubMed ID: 27298428 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]