218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3306777)
1. The control of breast cancer through mammography screening. What is the evidence?
Tabár L; Dean PB
Radiol Clin North Am; 1987 Sep; 25(5):993-1005. PubMed ID: 3306777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement: breast cancer screening for women ages 40-49, January 21-23, 1997. National Institutes of Health Consensus Developmental Panel.
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 1997; (22):vii-xviii. PubMed ID: 9709265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mammography screening for breast cancer in Copenhagen April 1991-March 1997. Mammography Screening Evaluation Group.
Lynge E
APMIS Suppl; 1998; 83():1-44. PubMed ID: 9850674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Results of intermediate measures from a population-based, randomized trial of mammographic screening prevalence and detection of breast carcinoma among Asian women: the Singapore Breast Screening Project.
Ng EH; Ng FC; Tan PH; Low SC; Chiang G; Tan KP; Seow A; Emmanuel S; Tan CH; Ho GH; Ng LT; Wilde CC
Cancer; 1998 Apr; 82(8):1521-8. PubMed ID: 9554530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Implementation of breast cancer screening.
Pisano ED; McLelland R
Curr Opin Radiol; 1991 Aug; 3(4):579-87. PubMed ID: 1909543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The impact of organized mammography service screening on breast carcinoma mortality in seven Swedish counties.
Duffy SW; Tabár L; Chen HH; Holmqvist M; Yen MF; Abdsalah S; Epstein B; Frodis E; Ljungberg E; Hedborg-Melander C; Sundbom A; Tholin M; Wiege M; Akerlund A; Wu HM; Tung TS; Chiu YH; Chiu CP; Huang CC; Smith RA; Rosén M; Stenbeck M; Holmberg L
Cancer; 2002 Aug; 95(3):458-69. PubMed ID: 12209737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Significant reduction in advanced breast cancer. Results of the first seven years of mammography screening in Kopparberg, Sweden.
Tabár L; Gad A; Holmberg L; Ljungquist U
Diagn Imaging Clin Med; 1985; 54(3-4):158-64. PubMed ID: 3896614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Screening and prevention of breast cancer in primary care.
Tice JA; Kerlikowske K
Prim Care; 2009 Sep; 36(3):533-58. PubMed ID: 19616154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Secondary prevention: screening for breast cancer.
Chamberlain J
Eff Health Care; 1985; 2(5):179-88. PubMed ID: 10271344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Screening for breast cancer in England: past and future.
Advisory Committee on Breast Cancer Screening
J Med Screen; 2006; 13(2):59-61. PubMed ID: 16792825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of screening for cancer in the Nordic countries on deaths, cost and quality of life up to the year 2017.
Hristova L; Hakama M
Acta Oncol; 1997; 36 Suppl 9():1-60. PubMed ID: 9143316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Contributions of the epidemiological cancer registries to the evaluation of mammography screening in Germany].
Urbschat I; Kieschke J; Schlanstedt-Jahn U; von Gehlen S; Thiel A; Jensch P
Gesundheitswesen; 2005 Jul; 67(7):448-54. PubMed ID: 16103967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Use of mammography in screening for breast cancer.
Sierra AE; Potchen EJ
Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 1990 Dec; 17(4):927-38. PubMed ID: 2092250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Attitudes of Colorado health professionals toward breast and cervical cancer screening in Hispanic women.
Bakemeier RF; Krebs LU; Murphy JR; Shen Z; Ryals T
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 1995; (18):95-100. PubMed ID: 8562228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mammography screening controversies.
Miller AB
Cancer Detect Prev; 1994; 18(4):305-11. PubMed ID: 7982240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Population screening for breast cancer by mammography in The Netherlands. Expectations, early results, negative effects and conditions for large-scale screening.
Hendriks JH; Verbeek AL
Diagn Imaging Clin Med; 1985; 54(3-4):186-91. PubMed ID: 3896616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Screening for breast cancer on basis of individual risk assessment for women ineligible for the national population screening program].
van Asperen CJ; de Bock GH; van der Horst F; de Koning HJ; Rutgers EJ
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2001 Jan; 145(3):120-5. PubMed ID: 11206121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prophylactic Oophorectomy: Reducing the U.S. Death Rate from Epithelial Ovarian Cancer. A Continuing Debate.
Piver MS
Oncologist; 1996; 1(5):326-330. PubMed ID: 10388011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Screening of cancer of the breast].
Conte M
Ann Chir Plast Esthet; 1992 Dec; 37(6):638-43. PubMed ID: 1340166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mammographic screening reduces risk of breast carcinoma recurrence.
Immonen-Räihä P; Kauhava L; Parvinen I; Holli K; Kronqvist P; Pylkkänen L; Helenius H; Kaljonen A; Räsänen O; Klemi PJ
Cancer; 2005 Feb; 103(3):474-82. PubMed ID: 15611974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]