These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33068769)
1. A comparison of the effects of Two suture materials on isthmocele formation: A cohort study. Hosseini R; Mansoorli S; Pirjani R; Eslamian L; Rabiee M J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2021 Apr; 50(4):101933. PubMed ID: 33068769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [A study of uterine adhesions following suturing of the uterus with catgut or Vicryl in cesarean sections in cattle]. De Wit F; Raymakers R; Westerbeek J; Mijten P; De Kruif A Tijdschr Diergeneeskd; 1993 Aug; 118(15):478-9. PubMed ID: 8367842 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Longitudinal transvaginal ultrasound evaluation of cesarean scar niche incidence and depth in the first two years after single- or double-layer uterotomy closure: a randomized controlled trial. Bamberg C; Hinkson L; Dudenhausen JW; Bujak V; Kalache KD; Henrich W Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2017 Dec; 96(12):1484-1489. PubMed ID: 28832909 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of Maxon suture with Vicryl, chromic catgut, and PDS sutures in fascial closure in rats. Sanz LE; Patterson JA; Kamath R; Willett G; Ahmed SW; Butterfield AB Obstet Gynecol; 1988 Mar; 71(3 Pt 1):418-22. PubMed ID: 3126470 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Risk factors for Korean women to develop an isthmocele after a cesarean section. Park IY; Kim MR; Lee HN; Gen Y; Kim MJ BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2018 May; 18(1):162. PubMed ID: 29764452 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Barbed vs conventional sutures for cesarean uterine scar defects: a randomized clinical trial. Maki J; Mitoma T; Ooba H; Nakato H; Mishima S; Tani K; Eto E; Yamamoto D; Yamamoto R; Kai K; Tamada T; Akamatsu K; Kawanishi K; Masuyama H Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2024 Sep; 6(9):101431. PubMed ID: 39019212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Does Suture Material Affect Uterine Scar Healing After Cesarean Section? Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial. Başbuğ A; Doğan O; Ellibeş Kaya A; Pulatoğlu Ç; Çağlar M J Invest Surg; 2019 Dec; 32(8):763-769. PubMed ID: 29667541 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Laparoscopic repair of a symptomatic post-cesarean section isthmocele: a video case report. Aimi G; Buggio L; Berlanda N; Vercellini P Fertil Steril; 2017 Jun; 107(6):e17-e18. PubMed ID: 28483506 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Does the suture material and technique have an effect on healing of the uterotomy in cesarean section?]. Sestanović Z; Mimica M; Vulić M; Roje D; Tomić S Lijec Vjesn; 2003; 125(9-10):245-51. PubMed ID: 15038214 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of suture materials for subcuticular skin closure at cesarean delivery. Tuuli MG; Stout MJ; Martin S; Rampersad RM; Cahill AG; Macones GA Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Oct; 215(4):490.e1-5. PubMed ID: 27179440 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of purse-string uterine suture on scar healing after a cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Halouani A; Dimassi K; Ben Mansour A; Triki A Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2023 Jul; 5(7):100992. PubMed ID: 37127211 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of transvaginal ultrasound and saline contrast sonohysterography in evaluation of cesarean scar defect: a prospective cohort study. Antila-Långsjö R; Mäenpää JU; Huhtala H; Tomás E; Staff S Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2018 Sep; 97(9):1130-1136. PubMed ID: 29754409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The influence of suture material on vaginal vault granulations following abdominal hysterectomy. Manyonda IT; Welch CR; McWhinney NA; Ross LD Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1990 Jul; 97(7):608-12. PubMed ID: 2390504 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An Optimal Uterine Closure Technique for Better Scar Healing and Avoiding Isthmocele in Cesarean Section: A Randomized Controlled Study. Kalem Z; Kaya AE; Bakırarar B; Basbug A; Kalem MN J Invest Surg; 2021 Feb; 34(2):148-156. PubMed ID: 31070072 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Histologic response to microsuture materials. Beauchamp PJ; Guzick DS; Held B; Schmidt WA J Reprod Med; 1988 Jul; 33(7):615-23. PubMed ID: 2845074 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of cesarean scar after single- and double-layer hysterotomy closure: a prospective cross-sectional study. Tekiner NB; Çetin BA; Türkgeldi LS; Yılmaz G; Polat İ; Gedikbaşı A Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2018 May; 297(5):1137-1143. PubMed ID: 29397441 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Monofilament vs multifilament suture for uterine closure at the time of cesarean delivery: a randomized clinical trial. Saccone G; De Angelis MC; Zizolfi B; Gragnano E; Musone M; Zullo F; Bifulco G; Di Spiezio Sardo A Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2022 May; 4(3):100592. PubMed ID: 35131497 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Association of cesarean scar defect with abnormal uterine bleeding: The results of a prospective study. Antila RM; Mäenpää JU; Huhtala HS; Tomás EI; Staff SM Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2020 Jan; 244():134-140. PubMed ID: 31785470 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effect of suture materials with different absorption times on isthmocele: a retrospective study. Yetkinel S; Caglar Aytac P; Kalayci H; Cok T; Dogan Durdag G; Alkas Yaginc D; Yilmaz Baran S; Alemdaroglu S; Bulgan Kilcdag E Ginekol Pol; 2023 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 37306162 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]