These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33069651)

  • 1. Predicting Physiological Success of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Pull Back and Pull Out?
    Völz S; Omerovic E
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Nov; 13(22):2685-2687. PubMed ID: 33069651
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Usefulness of the trans-stent fractional flow reserve gradient for predicting clinical outcomes.
    Yang HM; Lim HS; Yoon MH; Seo KW; Choi BJ; Choi SY; Hwang GS; Tahk SJ
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Apr; 95(5):E123-E129. PubMed ID: 31169345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In-stent fractional flow reserve variations and related optical coherence tomography findings: the FFR-OCT co-registration study.
    Pyxaras SA; Adriaenssens T; Barbato E; Ughi GJ; Di Serafino L; De Vroey F; Toth G; Tu S; Reiber JHC; Bax JJ; Wijns W
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Apr; 34(4):495-502. PubMed ID: 29080150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prognostic Implications of Relative Increase and Final Fractional Flow Reserve in Patients With Stent Implantation.
    Lee JM; Hwang D; Choi KH; Rhee TM; Park J; Kim HY; Jung HW; Hwang JW; Lee HJ; Jang HJ; Kim SH; Song YB; Cho YK; Nam CW; Hahn JY; Shin ES; Kawase Y; Matsuo A; Tanaka N; Doh JH; Koo BK; Matsuo H
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Oct; 11(20):2099-2109. PubMed ID: 30336814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Relationship between fractional flow reserve and residual plaque volume and clinical outcomes after optimal drug-eluting stent implantation: insight from intravascular ultrasound volumetric analysis.
    Ito T; Tani T; Fujita H; Ohte N
    Int J Cardiol; 2014 Sep; 176(2):399-404. PubMed ID: 25125008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: 2-year follow-up of the FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) study.
    Pijls NH; Fearon WF; Tonino PA; Siebert U; Ikeno F; Bornschein B; van't Veer M; Klauss V; Manoharan G; Engstrøm T; Oldroyd KG; Ver Lee PN; MacCarthy PA; De Bruyne B;
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2010 Jul; 56(3):177-84. PubMed ID: 20537493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cutoff Value and Long-Term Prediction of Clinical Events by FFR Measured Immediately After Implantation of a Drug-Eluting Stent in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: 1- to 3-Year Results From the DKCRUSH VII Registry Study.
    Li SJ; Ge Z; Kan J; Zhang JJ; Ye F; Kwan TW; Santoso T; Yang S; Sheiban I; Qian XS; Tian NL; Rab TS; Tao L; Chen SL
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 May; 10(10):986-995. PubMed ID: 28456699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Determinants of insufficient improvement in fractional flow reserve following percutaneous coronary intervention.
    Hirai K; Kawasaki T; Sakakura K; Soejima T; Kajiyama K; Fukami Y; Haraguchi K; Okonogi T; Fukuoka R; Orita Y; Umeji K; Koga H; Yamabe H
    Heart Vessels; 2020 Dec; 35(12):1650-1656. PubMed ID: 32524237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of lesion characteristics on the prediction of optimal poststent fractional flow reserve.
    Ando H; Takashima H; Suzuki A; Sakurai S; Kumagai S; Kurita A; Waseda K; Amano T
    Am Heart J; 2016 Dec; 182():119-124. PubMed ID: 27914491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prognostic Implications of Post-Intervention Resting Pd/Pa and Fractional Flow Reserve in Patients With Stent Implantation.
    Shin D; Lee SH; Lee JM; Choi KH; Hwang D; Lee HJ; Jang HJ; Kim HK; Kwak JJ; Ha SJ; Song YB; Shin ES; Doh JH
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Aug; 13(16):1920-1933. PubMed ID: 32819481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Association of moderate chronic kidney disease with insufficient improvement of fractional flow reserve after stent implantation.
    Sakoda K; Tanaka N; Hokama Y; Hoshino K; Murata N; Yamashita J; Yamashina A
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Aug; 88(2):E38-44. PubMed ID: 26489880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Role of Post-Stent Physiological Assessment in a Risk Prediction Model After Coronary Stent Implantation.
    Hwang D; Lee JM; Yang S; Chang M; Zhang J; Choi KH; Kim CH; Nam CW; Shin ES; Kwak JJ; Doh JH; Hoshino M; Hamaya R; Kanaji Y; Murai T; Zhang JJ; Ye F; Li X; Ge Z; Chen SL; Kakuta T; Koo BK
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Jul; 13(14):1639-1650. PubMed ID: 32703590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Explanation of Postprocedural Fractional Flow Reserve Below 0.85.
    van Zandvoort LJC; Masdjedi K; Witberg K; Ligthart J; Tovar Forero MN; Diletti R; Lemmert ME; Wilschut J; de Jaegere PPT; Boersma E; Zijlstra F; Van Mieghem NM; Daemen J
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Feb; 12(2):e007030. PubMed ID: 30732469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Characterization of real-world patients with low fractional flow reserve immediately after drug-eluting stents implantation.
    Kimura Y; Tanaka N; Okura H; Yoshida K; Akabane M; Takayama T; Hirayama A; Tada T; Kimura T; Takano H; Mizuno K; Inami T; Yoshino H; Yamashina A
    Cardiovasc Interv Ther; 2016 Jan; 31(1):29-37. PubMed ID: 26135607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Serial morphological and functional assessment of drug-eluting balloon for in-stent restenotic lesions: mechanisms of action evaluated with angiography, optical coherence tomography, and fractional flow reserve.
    Agostoni P; Belkacemi A; Voskuil M; Nathoe HM; Doevendans PA; Stella PR
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Jun; 6(6):569-76. PubMed ID: 23683736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prognostic Value of Fractional Flow Reserve Measured Immediately After Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation.
    Piroth Z; Toth GG; Tonino PAL; Barbato E; Aghlmandi S; Curzen N; Rioufol G; Pijls NHJ; Fearon WF; Jüni P; De Bruyne B
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Aug; 10(8):. PubMed ID: 28790165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Five-year clinical and functional multislice computed tomography angiographic results after coronary implantation of the fully resorbable polymeric everolimus-eluting scaffold in patients with de novo coronary artery disease: the ABSORB cohort A trial.
    Onuma Y; Dudek D; Thuesen L; Webster M; Nieman K; Garcia-Garcia HM; Ormiston JA; Serruys PW
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Oct; 6(10):999-1009. PubMed ID: 24156961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Utilizing Post-Intervention Fractional Flow Reserve to Optimize Acute Results and the Relationship to Long-Term Outcomes.
    Agarwal SK; Kasula S; Hacioglu Y; Ahmed Z; Uretsky BF; Hakeem A
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 May; 9(10):1022-31. PubMed ID: 27198682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Rationale and design of the Fractional Flow Reserve versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation (FAME) 3 Trial: a comparison of fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass graft surgery in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease.
    Zimmermann FM; De Bruyne B; Pijls NH; Desai M; Oldroyd KG; Park SJ; Reardon MJ; Wendler O; Woo J; Yeung AC; Fearon WF
    Am Heart J; 2015 Oct; 170(4):619-626.e2. PubMed ID: 26386784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical and physiological outcomes of fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with serial stenoses within one coronary artery.
    Kim HL; Koo BK; Nam CW; Doh JH; Kim JH; Yang HM; Park KW; Lee HY; Kang HJ; Cho YS; Youn TJ; Kim SH; Chae IH; Choi DJ; Kim HS; Oh BH; Park YB
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2012 Oct; 5(10):1013-8. PubMed ID: 23078728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.