These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33070075)

  • 1. Evasive behavior-based method for threat assessment in different scenarios: A novel framework for intelligent vehicle.
    Zhou H; Zhong Z
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Dec; 148():105798. PubMed ID: 33070075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Analysis of effects of driver's evasive action time on rear-end collision risk using a driving simulator.
    Shah D; Lee C
    J Safety Res; 2021 Sep; 78():242-250. PubMed ID: 34399920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analysis of near crashes among teen, young adult, and experienced adult drivers using the SHRP2 naturalistic driving study.
    Seacrist T; Douglas EC; Huang E; Megariotis J; Prabahar A; Kashem A; Elzarka A; Haber L; MacKinney T; Loeb H
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Feb; 19(sup1):S89-S96. PubMed ID: 29584473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Analysis of Driver Evasive Maneuvering Prior to Intersection Crashes Using Event Data Recorders.
    Scanlon JM; Kusano KD; Gabler HC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 2():S182-9. PubMed ID: 26436230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A method for evaluating collision avoidance systems using naturalistic driving data.
    McLaughlin SB; Hankey JM; Dingus TA
    Accid Anal Prev; 2008 Jan; 40(1):8-16. PubMed ID: 18215527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Creating pedestrian crash scenarios in a driving simulator environment.
    Chrysler ST; Ahmad O; Schwarz CW
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 1():S12-7. PubMed ID: 26027964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Exploring the effects of critical driving situations on driver perception time (PT) using SHRP2 naturalistic driving study data.
    Wu KF; Lin YJ
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Jul; 128():94-102. PubMed ID: 30991292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A rear-end collision risk assessment model based on drivers' collision avoidance process under influences of cell phone use and gender-A driving simulator based study.
    Li X; Yan X; Wu J; Radwan E; Zhang Y
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Dec; 97():1-18. PubMed ID: 27565040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Modeling driver's evasive behavior during safety-critical lane changes: Two-dimensional time-to-collision and deep reinforcement learning.
    Guo H; Xie K; Keyvan-Ekbatani M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Jun; 186():107063. PubMed ID: 37023652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A forward collision avoidance algorithm based on driver braking behavior.
    Xiong X; Wang M; Cai Y; Chen L; Farah H; Hagenzieker M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Aug; 129():30-43. PubMed ID: 31103877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Crash probability estimation via quantifying driver hazard perception.
    Li Y; Zheng Y; Wang J; Kodaka K; Li K
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Jul; 116():116-125. PubMed ID: 28595973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The role of pre-crash driving instability in contributing to crash intensity using naturalistic driving data.
    Arvin R; Kamrani M; Khattak AJ
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Nov; 132():105226. PubMed ID: 31465934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Counterfactual simulations applied to SHRP2 crashes: The effect of driver behavior models on safety benefit estimations of intelligent safety systems.
    Bärgman J; Boda CN; Dozza M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 May; 102():165-180. PubMed ID: 28315616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Extended time-to-collision measures for road traffic safety assessment.
    Minderhoud MM; Bovy PH
    Accid Anal Prev; 2001 Jan; 33(1):89-97. PubMed ID: 11189125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of the safety benefits of vehicles' advanced driver assistance, connectivity and low level automation systems.
    Yue L; Abdel-Aty M; Wu Y; Wang L
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Aug; 117():55-64. PubMed ID: 29654988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How to assess driver's interaction with partially automated driving systems - A framework for early concept assessment.
    van den Beukel AP; van der Voort MC
    Appl Ergon; 2017 Mar; 59(Pt A):302-312. PubMed ID: 27890141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Taking Over Control From Highly Automated Vehicles in Complex Traffic Situations: The Role of Traffic Density.
    Gold C; Körber M; Lechner D; Bengler K
    Hum Factors; 2016 Jun; 58(4):642-52. PubMed ID: 26984515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Multi-vehicle interaction safety of connected automated vehicles in merging area: A real-time risk assessment approach.
    Zhu J; Ma Y; Lou Y
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Mar; 166():106546. PubMed ID: 34965492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Adverse Behavioral Adaptation to Adaptive Forward Collision Warning Systems: An Investigation of Primary and Secondary Task Performance.
    Reinmueller K; Kiesel A; Steinhauser M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Oct; 146():105718. PubMed ID: 32847736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Experiences of model year 2011 Dodge and Jeep owners with collision avoidance and related technologies.
    Cicchino JB; McCartt AT
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16():298-303. PubMed ID: 24983299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.