These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33070453)

  • 41. Environmental RNA outperforms eDNA metabarcoding in assessing impact of marine pollution: A chromium-spiked mesocosm test.
    Greco M; Lejzerowicz F; Reo E; Caruso A; Maccotta A; Coccioni R; Pawlowski J; Frontalini F
    Chemosphere; 2022 Jul; 298():134239. PubMed ID: 35292278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Environmental RNA as a Tool for Marine Community Biodiversity Assessments.
    Giroux MS; Reichman JR; Langknecht T; Burgess RM; Ho KT
    Sci Rep; 2022 Oct; 12(1):17782. PubMed ID: 36273070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. eDNA metabarcoding survey reveals fine-scale coral reef community variation across a remote, tropical island ecosystem.
    West KM; Stat M; Harvey ES; Skepper CL; DiBattista JD; Richards ZT; Travers MJ; Newman SJ; Bunce M
    Mol Ecol; 2020 Mar; 29(6):1069-1086. PubMed ID: 32045076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Biodiversity exploration of Formosa Ridge cold seep in the South China Sea using an eDNA metabarcoding approach.
    Diao C; Wang M; Zhong Z; Li Y; Xian W; Zhang H
    Mar Environ Res; 2023 Sep; 190():106109. PubMed ID: 37506653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. [Precision of eDNA Metabarcoding Technology for Biodiversity Monitoring of Eukaryotic Phytoplankton in Lakes].
    Zhang LJ; Xu S; Zhao Z; Zhou XH; Feng Q; Yang JH; Li FL; Wang ZH; Zhang XW
    Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2021 Feb; 42(2):796-807. PubMed ID: 33742874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Using vertebrate environmental DNA from seawater in biomonitoring of marine habitats.
    Sigsgaard EE; Torquato F; Frøslev TG; Moore ABM; Sørensen JM; Range P; Ben-Hamadou R; Bach SS; Møller PR; Thomsen PF
    Conserv Biol; 2020 Jun; 34(3):697-710. PubMed ID: 31729081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Bioinformatic pipelines combining denoising and clustering tools allow for more comprehensive prokaryotic and eukaryotic metabarcoding.
    Brandt MI; Trouche B; Quintric L; Günther B; Wincker P; Poulain J; Arnaud-Haond S
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2021 Aug; 21(6):1904-1921. PubMed ID: 33835712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Environmental DNA metabarcoding reveals estuarine benthic community response to nutrient enrichment - Evidence from an in-situ experiment.
    Clark DE; Pilditch CA; Pearman JK; Ellis JI; Zaiko A
    Environ Pollut; 2020 Dec; 267():115472. PubMed ID: 32891048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Assessment of stream macroinvertebrate communities with eDNA is not congruent with tissue-based metabarcoding.
    Gleason JE; Elbrecht V; Braukmann TWA; Hanner RH; Cottenie K
    Mol Ecol; 2021 Jul; 30(13):3239-3251. PubMed ID: 32799390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Validating metabarcoding-based biodiversity assessments with multi-species occupancy models: A case study using coastal marine eDNA.
    McClenaghan B; Compson ZG; Hajibabaei M
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(3):e0224119. PubMed ID: 32191699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The future of biotic indices in the ecogenomic era: Integrating (e)DNA metabarcoding in biological assessment of aquatic ecosystems.
    Pawlowski J; Kelly-Quinn M; Altermatt F; Apothéloz-Perret-Gentil L; Beja P; Boggero A; Borja A; Bouchez A; Cordier T; Domaizon I; Feio MJ; Filipe AF; Fornaroli R; Graf W; Herder J; van der Hoorn B; Iwan Jones J; Sagova-Mareckova M; Moritz C; Barquín J; Piggott JJ; Pinna M; Rimet F; Rinkevich B; Sousa-Santos C; Specchia V; Trobajo R; Vasselon V; Vitecek S; Zimmerman J; Weigand A; Leese F; Kahlert M
    Sci Total Environ; 2018 Oct; 637-638():1295-1310. PubMed ID: 29801222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Taxonomy-free molecular diatom index for high-throughput eDNA biomonitoring.
    Apothéloz-Perret-Gentil L; Cordonier A; Straub F; Iseli J; Esling P; Pawlowski J
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2017 Nov; 17(6):1231-1242. PubMed ID: 28296259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Comparison of markers for the monitoring of freshwater benthic biodiversity through DNA metabarcoding.
    Ficetola GF; Boyer F; Valentini A; Bonin A; Meyer A; Dejean T; Gaboriaud C; Usseglio-Polatera P; Taberlet P
    Mol Ecol; 2021 Jul; 30(13):3189-3202. PubMed ID: 32920861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Space-time dynamics in monitoring neotropical fish communities using eDNA metabarcoding.
    Sales NG; Wangensteen OS; Carvalho DC; Deiner K; Præbel K; Coscia I; McDevitt AD; Mariani S
    Sci Total Environ; 2021 Feb; 754():142096. PubMed ID: 32898783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Assessing the effect of mercury pollution on cultured benthic foraminifera community using morphological and eDNA metabarcoding approaches.
    Frontalini F; Greco M; Di Bella L; Lejzerowicz F; Reo E; Caruso A; Cosentino C; Maccotta A; Scopelliti G; Nardelli MP; Losada MT; Armynot du Châtelet E; Coccioni R; Pawlowski J
    Mar Pollut Bull; 2018 Apr; 129(2):512-524. PubMed ID: 29033170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Detection of community-wide impacts of bottom trawl fishing on deep-sea assemblages using environmental DNA metabarcoding.
    Good E; Holman LE; Pusceddu A; Russo T; Rius M; Iacono CL
    Mar Pollut Bull; 2022 Oct; 183():114062. PubMed ID: 36075115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Assessment of littoral algal diversity from the northern Gulf of Mexico using environmental DNA metabarcoding.
    Bombin S; Wysor B; Lopez-Bautista JM
    J Phycol; 2021 Feb; 57(1):269-278. PubMed ID: 33107058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. eDNA metabarcoding as a promising conservation tool for monitoring fish diversity in a coastal wetland of the Pearl River Estuary compared to bottom trawling.
    Zou K; Chen J; Ruan H; Li Z; Guo W; Li M; Liu L
    Sci Total Environ; 2020 Feb; 702():134704. PubMed ID: 31726353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Use of environmental DNA in assessment of fish functional and phylogenetic diversity.
    Marques V; Castagné P; Polanco A; Borrero-Pérez GH; Hocdé R; Guérin PÉ; Juhel JB; Velez L; Loiseau N; Letessier TB; Bessudo S; Valentini A; Dejean T; Mouillot D; Pellissier L; Villéger S
    Conserv Biol; 2021 Dec; 35(6):1944-1956. PubMed ID: 34224158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding reveals strong discrimination among diverse marine habitats connected by water movement.
    Jeunen GJ; Knapp M; Spencer HG; Lamare MD; Taylor HR; Stat M; Bunce M; Gemmell NJ
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2019 Mar; 19(2):426-438. PubMed ID: 30576077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.