These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Devices of Responsibility: Over a Decade of Responsible Research and Innovation Initiatives for Nanotechnologies. Shelley-Egan C; Bowman DM; Robinson DKR Sci Eng Ethics; 2018 Dec; 24(6):1719-1746. PubMed ID: 29019058 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Moral responsibility and the 'ignorant scientist'. Forge J Sci Eng Ethics; 2000 Jul; 6(3):341-9. PubMed ID: 11273459 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Caring for nanotechnology? Being an integrated social scientist. Viseu A Soc Stud Sci; 2015 Oct; 45(5):642-64. PubMed ID: 26630815 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Scientific Citizenship and good governance: implications for biotechnology. Davies KG; Wolf-Phillips J Trends Biotechnol; 2006 Feb; 24(2):57-61. PubMed ID: 16380180 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Lab work goes social, and vice versa: strategising public engagement processes : commentary on: "What happens in the lab does not stay in the lab: applying midstream modulation to enhance critical reflection in the laboratory". Wynne B Sci Eng Ethics; 2011 Dec; 17(4):791-800. PubMed ID: 22015948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Scientists' Ethical Obligations and Social Responsibility for Nanotechnology Research. Corley EA; Kim Y; Scheufele DA Sci Eng Ethics; 2016 Feb; 22(1):111-32. PubMed ID: 25721444 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The lure of rationality: Why does the deficit model persist in science communication? Simis MJ; Madden H; Cacciatore MA; Yeo SK Public Underst Sci; 2016 May; 25(4):400-14. PubMed ID: 27117768 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reflections on different governance styles in regulating science: a contribution to 'Responsible Research and Innovation'. Landeweerd L; Townend D; Mesman J; Van Hoyweghen I Life Sci Soc Policy; 2015; 11():8. PubMed ID: 26260065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. From 'trust us' to participatory governance: Deliberative publics and science policy. Burgess MM Public Underst Sci; 2014 Jan; 23(1):48-52. PubMed ID: 24434712 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Science and community psychology: social norms for pluralistic inquiry. Kelly JG Am J Community Psychol; 2003 Jun; 31(3-4):213-7. PubMed ID: 12866679 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. In science communication, why does the idea of a public deficit always return? Meyer G Public Underst Sci; 2016 May; 25(4):433-46. PubMed ID: 27117771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bridging current issues in science and society. Pierce RL Biotechnol J; 2013 Aug; 8(8):875-7. PubMed ID: 23857872 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Industrial Biotechnology: To What Extent Is Responsible Innovation on the Agenda? Rosemann A; Molyneux-Hodgson S Trends Biotechnol; 2020 Jan; 38(1):5-7. PubMed ID: 31399264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Should We All be Scientists? Re-thinking Laboratory Research as a Calling. Bezuidenhout L; Warne NA Sci Eng Ethics; 2018 Aug; 24(4):1161-1179. PubMed ID: 28726028 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Product, not process! Explaining a basic concept in agricultural biotechnologies and food safety. Tagliabue G Life Sci Soc Policy; 2017 Dec; 13(1):3. PubMed ID: 28255668 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Whatever happened to the 'mad, bad' scientist? Overturning the stereotype. Haynes RD Public Underst Sci; 2016 Jan; 25(1):31-44. PubMed ID: 24916194 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Responsible Governance for a Food and Nutrition E-Infrastructure: Case Study of the Determinants and Intake Data Platform. Timotijevic L; Carr I; De La Cueva J; Eftimov T; Hodgkins CE; Koroušić Seljak B; Mikkelsen BE; Selnes T; Van't Veer P; Zimmermann K Front Nutr; 2021; 8():795802. PubMed ID: 35402471 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]