550 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33070974)
1. In vitro evaluation of the accuracy and precision of intraoral and extraoral complete-arch scans.
Baghani MT; Shayegh SS; Johnston WM; Shidfar S; Hakimaneh SMR
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Nov; 126(5):665-670. PubMed ID: 33070974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of operator experience, scanner type, and scan size on 3D scans.
Resende CCD; Barbosa TAQ; Moura GF; Tavares LDN; Rizzante FAP; George FM; Neves FDD; Mendonça G
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Feb; 125(2):294-299. PubMed ID: 32115221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy of complete-arch intraoral scans based on confocal microscopy versus optical triangulation: A comparative in vitro study.
Waldecker M; Rues S; Rammelsberg P; Bömicke W
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Sep; 126(3):414-420. PubMed ID: 32950254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparative study assessing the precision and trueness of digital and printed casts produced from several intraoral and extraoral scanners in full arch and short span (3-unit FPD) scanning: An in vitro study.
Ellakany P; Aly NM; Al-Harbi F
J Prosthodont; 2023 Jun; 32(5):423-430. PubMed ID: 35852379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Complete-arch accuracy of intraoral scanners.
Treesh JC; Liacouras PC; Taft RM; Brooks DI; Raiciulescu S; Ellert DO; Grant GT; Ye L
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Sep; 120(3):382-388. PubMed ID: 29724554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of complete- and partial-arch impressions of actual intraoral scanning systems in vitro.
Ender A; Zimmermann M; Mehl A
Int J Comput Dent; 2019; 22(1):11-19. PubMed ID: 30848250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of accuracy of 3 intraoral scanners: A single-blinded in vitro study.
Michelinakis G; Apostolakis D; Tsagarakis A; Kourakis G; Pavlakis E
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Nov; 124(5):581-588. PubMed ID: 31870614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy of six intraoral scanners for scanning complete-arch and 4-unit fixed partial dentures: An in vitro study.
Diker B; Tak Ö
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Aug; 128(2):187-194. PubMed ID: 33558056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Influence of trueness for local finish lines of a full crown preparation on that of complete finish line].
Jiang N; Bao XD; Yue L
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2020 Sep; 53(1):102-108. PubMed ID: 33550343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Three-Dimensional Accuracy of Conventional Versus Digital Complete Arch Implant Impressions.
Albayrak B; Sukotjo C; Wee AG; Korkmaz İH; Bayındır F
J Prosthodont; 2021 Feb; 30(2):163-170. PubMed ID: 32935894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of a chairside intraoral scanner compared with a laboratory scanner for the completely edentulous maxilla: An in vitro 3-dimensional comparative analysis.
Zarone F; Ruggiero G; Ferrari M; Mangano F; Joda T; Sorrentino R
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Dec; 124(6):761.e1-761.e7. PubMed ID: 33289647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical Study of the Influence of Ambient Light Scanning Conditions on the Accuracy (Trueness and Precision) of an Intraoral Scanner.
Revilla-León M; Subramanian SG; Özcan M; Krishnamurthy VR
J Prosthodont; 2020 Feb; 29(2):107-113. PubMed ID: 31860144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Scan time and accuracy of full-arch scans with intraoral scanners: a comparative study on conditions of the intraoral head-simulator and the hand-held model].
Wu MT; Tang SX; Peng LY; Han YT; Su YC; Wang X
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2021 Jun; 56(6):570-575. PubMed ID: 34098673
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of different material substrates on the accuracy of 3 intraoral scanners: A single-blinded in vitro study.
Michelinakis G; Apostolakis D; Tsagarakis A; Lampropoulos P
Int J Prosthodont; 2022; 35(1):82–93. PubMed ID: 33751003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of 3D Printed and Digital Casts Produced from Intraoral and Extraoral Scanners with Different Scanning Technologies: In Vitro Study.
Ellakany P; Aly NM; Al-Harbi F
J Prosthodont; 2022 Jul; 31(6):521-528. PubMed ID: 34661950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy of three digital scanning methods for complete-arch tooth preparation: An in vitro comparison.
Gao H; Liu X; Liu M; Yang X; Tan J
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Nov; 128(5):1001-1008. PubMed ID: 33736864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of the accuracy of 7 digital scanners: An in vitro analysis based on 3-dimensional comparisons.
Renne W; Ludlow M; Fryml J; Schurch Z; Mennito A; Kessler R; Lauer A
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jul; 118(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 28024822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Accuracy of three intraoral scans for primary impressions of edentulous jaws].
Cao Y; Chen JK; Deng KH; Wang Y; Sun YC; Zhao YJ
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2020 Feb; 52(1):129-137. PubMed ID: 32071476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of additional reference objects on accuracy of five intraoral scanners in partially and completely edentulous jaws: An in vitro study.
Rutkūnas V; Gedrimienė A; Al-Haj Husain N; Pletkus J; Barauskis D; Jegelevičius D; Özcan M
J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Jul; 130(1):111-118. PubMed ID: 34799084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of abutment tooth geometry on the accuracy of conventional and digital methods of obtaining dental impressions.
Carbajal Mejía JB; Wakabayashi K; Nakamura T; Yatani H
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Sep; 118(3):392-399. PubMed ID: 28222873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
