These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33071484)

  • 1. Improving External Validity of Epidemiologic Cohort Analyses: A Kernel Weighting Approach.
    Wang L; Graubard BI; Katki HA; Li Y
    J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc; 2020 Jun; 183(3):1293-1311. PubMed ID: 33071484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Adjusted logistic propensity weighting methods for population inference using nonprobability volunteer-based epidemiologic cohorts.
    Wang L; Valliant R; Li Y
    Stat Med; 2021 Oct; 40(24):5237-5250. PubMed ID: 34219260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Variance estimation when using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) with survival analysis.
    Austin PC
    Stat Med; 2016 Dec; 35(30):5642-5655. PubMed ID: 27549016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Addressing Extreme Propensity Scores via the Overlap Weights.
    Li F; Thomas LE; Li F
    Am J Epidemiol; 2019 Jan; 188(1):250-257. PubMed ID: 30189042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An application of a weighting method to adjust for nonresponse in standardized incidence ratio analysis of cohort studies.
    Rao RS; Sigurdson AJ; Doody MM; Graubard BI
    Ann Epidemiol; 2005 Feb; 15(2):129-36. PubMed ID: 15652718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Propensity score analysis with partially observed covariates: How should multiple imputation be used?
    Leyrat C; Seaman SR; White IR; Douglas I; Smeeth L; Kim J; Resche-Rigon M; Carpenter JR; Williamson EJ
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Jan; 28(1):3-19. PubMed ID: 28573919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Variance estimation methods in samples from household surveys].
    Porto Alves MC; Silva NN
    Rev Saude Publica; 2007 Dec; 41(6):938-46. PubMed ID: 17992355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On modelling response propensity for dwelling unit (DU) level non-response adjustment in the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS).
    Wun LM; Ezzati-Rice TM; Diaz-Tena N; Greenblatt J
    Stat Med; 2007 Apr; 26(8):1875-84. PubMed ID: 17206601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Incorporating Complex Sample Design Effects When Only Final Survey Weights are Available.
    West BT; McCabe SE
    Stata J; 2012 Oct; 12(4):718-725. PubMed ID: 24596541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Logistic analysis of epidemiologic studies with augmentation sampling involving re-stratification and population expansion.
    Li Y; Safaeian M; Robbins HA; Graubard BI
    Biostatistics; 2015 Jan; 16(1):169-78. PubMed ID: 24907707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Two-step estimation in ratio-of-mediator-probability weighted causal mediation analysis.
    Bein E; Deutsch J; Hong G; Porter KE; Qin X; Yang C
    Stat Med; 2018 Apr; 37(8):1304-1324. PubMed ID: 29322536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Propensity score weighting analysis and treatment effect discovery.
    Mao H; Li L; Greene T
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Aug; 28(8):2439-2454. PubMed ID: 29921162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of entropy balance and probability weighting methods to generalize observational cohorts to a population: a simulation and empirical example.
    Harvey RA; Hayden JD; Kamble PS; Bouchard JR; Huang JC
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2017 Apr; 26(4):368-377. PubMed ID: 27859943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Grouping methods for estimating the prevalences of rare traits from complex survey data that preserve confidentiality of respondents.
    Hyun N; Gastwirth JL; Graubard BI
    Stat Med; 2018 Jun; 37(13):2174-2186. PubMed ID: 29579785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Variable inclusion strategies through directed acyclic graphs to adjust health surveys subject to selection bias for producing national estimates.
    Li Y; Irimata KE; He Y; Parker J
    J Off Stat; 2022 Sep; 38(3):875-900. PubMed ID: 36157569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. On weighting the rates in non-response weights.
    Little RJ; Vartivarian S
    Stat Med; 2003 May; 22(9):1589-99. PubMed ID: 12704617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Calibrated propensity score method for survey nonresponse in cluster sampling.
    Kim JK; Kwon Y; Paik MC
    Biometrika; 2016 Jun; 103(2):461-473. PubMed ID: 27279670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Correction for bias in meta-analysis of little-replicated studies.
    Doncaster CP; Spake R
    Methods Ecol Evol; 2018 Mar; 9(3):634-644. PubMed ID: 29938012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A Viable Alternative When Propensity Scores Fail: Evaluation of Inverse Propensity Weighting and Sequential G-Estimation in a Two-Wave Mediation Model.
    Valente MJ; MacKinnon DP; Mazza GL
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2020; 55(2):165-187. PubMed ID: 31220937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Performance evaluation of regression splines for propensity score adjustment in post-market safety analysis with multiple treatments.
    Tian Y; Baro E; Zhang R
    J Biopharm Stat; 2019; 29(5):810-821. PubMed ID: 31502924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.