These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Biomechanical In Vitro Study on the Stability of Patient-Specific CAD/CAM Mandibular Reconstruction Plates: A Comparison Between Selective Laser Melted, Milled, and Hand-Bent Plates. Kasper R; Winter K; Pietzka S; Schramm A; Wilde F Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr; 2021 Jun; 14(2):135-143. PubMed ID: 33995834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Three-dimensional accuracy of mandibular reconstruction by patient-specific pre-bent reconstruction plates using an "in-house" 3D-printer. Naros A; Weise H; Tilsen F; Hoefert S; Naros G; Krimmel M; Reinert S; Polligkeit J J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2018 Sep; 46(9):1645-1651. PubMed ID: 29983306 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Application of Combined Osteotomy and Reconstruction Pre-Bent Plate Position (CORPPP) Technology to Assist in the Precise Reconstruction of Segmental Mandibular Defects. Liang Y; Jiang C; Wu L; Wang W; Liu Y; Jian X J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Sep; 75(9):2026.e1-2026.e10. PubMed ID: 28600917 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Local and systemic risk factors influencing the long-term success of angular stable alloplastic reconstruction plates of the mandible. Kämmerer PW; Klein MO; Moergel M; Gemmel M; Draenert GF J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Jul; 42(5):e271-6. PubMed ID: 24296118 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Multicenter study on the use of patient-specific CAD/CAM reconstruction plates for mandibular reconstruction. Wilde F; Hanken H; Probst F; Schramm A; Heiland M; Cornelius CP Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2015 Dec; 10(12):2035-51. PubMed ID: 25843949 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biomechanical comparison of locking and non-locking patient-specific mandibular reconstruction plate using finite element analysis. Zhong S; Shi Q; Sun Y; Yang S; Van Dessel J; Gu Y; Chen X; Lübbers HT; Politis C J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2021 Dec; 124():104849. PubMed ID: 34563812 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy of computer-assisted mandibular reconstructions using patient-specific implants in combination with CAD/CAM fabricated transfer keys. Mascha F; Winter K; Pietzka S; Heufelder M; Schramm A; Wilde F J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2017 Nov; 45(11):1884-1897. PubMed ID: 28965991 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The fitting accuracy of pre-bend reconstruction plates and their impact on the temporomandibular joint. Wurm MC; Hagen J; Nkenke E; Neukam FW; Schlittenbauer T J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2019 Jan; 47(1):53-59. PubMed ID: 30470467 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of the Accuracy and Clinical Parameters of Patient-Specific and Conventionally Bended Plates for Mandibular Reconstruction. Möllmann HL; Apeltrath L; Karnatz N; Wilkat M; Riedel E; Singh DD; Rana M Front Oncol; 2021; 11():719028. PubMed ID: 34900674 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Feasibility of alloplastic mandibular reconstruction in patients following removal of oral squamous cell carcinoma. Ettl T; Driemel O; Dresp BV; Reichert TE; Reuther J; Pistner H J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2010 Jul; 38(5):350-4. PubMed ID: 19501515 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Factors involved in long- and short-term mandibular plate exposure. Nicholson RE; Schuller DE; Forrest LA; Mountain RE; Ali T; Young D Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1997 Feb; 123(2):217-22. PubMed ID: 9046293 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Alloplastic reconstruction of the mandible after subtotal mandibulectomy for medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw: An update of the method. Bräuer C; Ullmann K; Lauer G; Franke A; McLeod NMH; Leonhardt H Head Neck; 2023 Oct; 45(10):2638-2648. PubMed ID: 37622613 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Short-term outcomes of mandibular reconstruction in oncological patients using a CAD/CAM prosthesis including a condyle supporting a fibular free flap. Tarsitano A; Battaglia S; Ramieri V; Cascone P; Ciocca L; Scotti R; Marchetti C J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2017 Feb; 45(2):330-337. PubMed ID: 28052811 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Patient-specific implant modification for alloplastic bridging of mandibular segmental defects in head and neck surgery. Jehn P; Spalthoff S; Korn P; Zeller AN; Dittmann J; Zimmerer R; Tavassol F; Gellrich NC J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2020 Mar; 48(3):315-322. PubMed ID: 32089430 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biomechanical validation of structural optimized patient-specific mandibular reconstruction plate orienting additive manufacturing. Zhong S; Shi Q; Van Dessel J; Gu Y; Sun Y; Yang S; Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2022 Sep; 224():107023. PubMed ID: 35872386 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomechanical evaluation of CAD/CAM magnesium miniplates as a fixation strategy for the treatment of segmental mandibular reconstruction with a fibula free flap. Ruf P; Orassi V; Fischer H; Steffen C; Kreutzer K; Duda GN; Heiland M; Checa S; Rendenbach C Comput Biol Med; 2024 Jan; 168():107817. PubMed ID: 38064852 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fracture of Standard Titanium Mandibular Reconstruction Plates and Preliminary Study of Three-Dimensional Printed Reconstruction Plates. Almansoori AA; Choung HW; Kim B; Park JY; Kim SM; Lee JH J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2020 Jan; 78(1):153-166. PubMed ID: 31473106 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mandibular reconstruction using a titanium plate: the impact of radiation therapy on plate preservation. Ryu JK; Stern RL; Robinson MG; Bowers MK; Kubo HD; Donald PJ; Rosenthal SA; Fu KK Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1995 Jun; 32(3):627-34. PubMed ID: 7790248 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]