These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33074752)

  • 1. GPS predicts stability of listening environment characteristics in one location over time among older hearing aid users.
    Jorgensen EJ; Stangl E; Chipara O; Hernandez H; Oleson J; Wu YH
    Int J Audiol; 2021 May; 60(5):328-340. PubMed ID: 33074752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of hearing aid technologies on listening in an automobile.
    Wu YH; Stangl E; Bentler RA; Stanziola RW
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Jun; 24(6):474-85. PubMed ID: 23886425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How hearing aids, background noise, and visual cues influence objective listening effort.
    Picou EM; Ricketts TA; Hornsby BW
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):e52-64. PubMed ID: 23416751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Test-Retest Reliability of Ecological Momentary Assessment in Audiology Research.
    Wu YH; Stangl E; Chipara O; Zhang X
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2020 Sep; 31(8):599-612. PubMed ID: 33157559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Speech Perception in Noise and Listening Effort of Older Adults With Nonlinear Frequency Compression Hearing Aids.
    Shehorn J; Marrone N; Muller T
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(2):215-225. PubMed ID: 28806193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Potential benefits and limitations of three types of directional processing in hearing aids.
    Picou EM; Aspell E; Ricketts TA
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(3):339-52. PubMed ID: 24518429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The influence of audiovisual ceiling performance on the relationship between reverberation and directional benefit: perception and prediction.
    Wu YH; Bentler RA
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(5):604-14. PubMed ID: 22677815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Effects of Hearing Aid Directional Microphone and Noise Reduction Processing on Listening Effort in Older Adults with Hearing Loss.
    Desjardins JL
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Jan; 27(1):29-41. PubMed ID: 26809324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Construct Validity of the Ecological Momentary Assessment in Audiology Research.
    Wu YH; Stangl E; Zhang X; Bentler RA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015; 26(10):872-84. PubMed ID: 26554491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impact of Hearing Aid Technology on Outcomes in Daily Life II: Speech Understanding and Listening Effort.
    Johnson JA; Xu J; Cox RM
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(5):529-40. PubMed ID: 27556363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Consistency of Hearing Aid Setting Preference in Simulated Real-World Environments: Implications for Trainable Hearing Aids.
    Walravens E; Keidser G; Hickson L
    Trends Hear; 2020; 24():2331216520933392. PubMed ID: 32602407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Measuring listening effort: driving simulator versus simple dual-task paradigm.
    Wu YH; Aksan N; Rizzo M; Stangl E; Zhang X; Bentler R
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(6):623-32. PubMed ID: 25083599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Wireless binaural hearing aid technology for telephone use and listening in wind noise.
    Au A; Blakeley JM; Dowell RC; Rance G
    Int J Audiol; 2019 Apr; 58(4):193-199. PubMed ID: 30474445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Characteristics of Real-World Signal to Noise Ratios and Speech Listening Situations of Older Adults With Mild to Moderate Hearing Loss.
    Wu YH; Stangl E; Chipara O; Hasan SS; Welhaven A; Oleson J
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(2):293-304. PubMed ID: 29466265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of Adaptive Noise Management Technologies for School-Age Children with Hearing Loss.
    Wolfe J; Duke M; Schafer E; Jones C; Rakita L
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 May; 28(5):415-435. PubMed ID: 28534732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Smartphone-Based System for Learning and Inferring Hearing Aid Settings.
    Aldaz G; Puria S; Leifer LJ
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Oct; 27(9):732-749. PubMed ID: 27718350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Speech recognition for bilaterally asymmetric and symmetric hearing aid microphone modes in simulated classroom environments.
    Ricketts TA; Picou EM
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):601-9. PubMed ID: 23524508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Expectations, prefitting counseling, and hearing aid outcome.
    Saunders GH; Lewis MS; Forsline A
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2009 May; 20(5):320-34. PubMed ID: 19585963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Predicting hearing aid microphone preference in everyday listening.
    Walden BE; Surr RK; Cord MT; Dyrlund O
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2004 May; 15(5):365-96. PubMed ID: 15506498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effects of hearing aid use on listening effort and mental fatigue associated with sustained speech processing demands.
    Hornsby BW
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):523-34. PubMed ID: 23426091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.