BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

286 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33075151)

  • 1. Influence of pelvic lymph node dissection and node-positive disease on biochemical recurrence, secondary treatment, and survival after radical prostatectomy in men with prostate cancer.
    Washington SL; Cowan JE; Herlemann A; Zuniga KB; Masic S; Nguyen HG; Carroll PR
    Prostate; 2021 Feb; 81(2):102-108. PubMed ID: 33075151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Outcomes after radical prostatectomy for patients with clinical stages T1-T2 prostate cancer with pathologically positive lymph nodes in the prostate-specific antigen era.
    Dorin RP; Lieskovsky G; Fairey AS; Cai J; Daneshmand S
    Urol Oncol; 2013 Nov; 31(8):1441-7. PubMed ID: 22516714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Role of Prostate-specific Antigen Persistence After Radical Prostatectomy for the Prediction of Clinical Progression and Cancer-specific Mortality in Node-positive Prostate Cancer Patients.
    Bianchi L; Nini A; Bianchi M; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Suardi N; Moschini M; Dell'Oglio P; Schiavina R; Montorsi F; Briganti A
    Eur Urol; 2016 Jun; 69(6):1142-8. PubMed ID: 26749093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Long-term Outcomes of Salvage Lymph Node Dissection for Nodal Recurrence of Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy: Not as Good as Previously Thought.
    Bravi CA; Fossati N; Gandaglia G; Suardi N; Mazzone E; Robesti D; Osmonov D; Juenemann KP; Boeri L; Jeffrey Karnes R; Kretschmer A; Buchner A; Stief C; Hiester A; Nini A; Albers P; Devos G; Joniau S; Van Poppel H; Shariat SF; Heidenreich A; Pfister D; Tilki D; Graefen M; Gill IS; Mottrie A; Karakiewicz PI; Montorsi F; Briganti A
    Eur Urol; 2020 Nov; 78(5):661-669. PubMed ID: 32624288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Long-term outcomes of salvage lymph node dissection for clinically recurrent prostate cancer: results of a single-institution series with a minimum follow-up of 5 years.
    Suardi N; Gandaglia G; Gallina A; Di Trapani E; Scattoni V; Vizziello D; Cucchiara V; Bertini R; Colombo R; Picchio M; Giovacchini G; Montorsi F; Briganti A
    Eur Urol; 2015 Feb; 67(2):299-309. PubMed ID: 24571959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Surgeon-led prostate cancer lymph node staging: pathological outcomes stratified by robot-assisted dissection templates and patient selection.
    Altok M; Babaian K; Achim MF; Achim GC; Troncoso P; Matin SF; Chapin BF; Davis JW
    BJU Int; 2018 Jul; 122(1):66-75. PubMed ID: 29446205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Association between Lymph Node Counts and Oncological Outcomes in Lymph Node Positive Prostate Cancer.
    Mandel P; Kriegmair MC; Bogdan K; Boehm K; Budäus L; Graefen M; Huland H; Tilki D
    Eur Urol Focus; 2017 Apr; 3(2-3):248-255. PubMed ID: 28753755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The extent of pelvic lymph node dissection correlates with the biochemical recurrence rate in patients with intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer.
    Schiavina R; Manferrari F; Garofalo M; Bertaccini A; Vagnoni V; Guidi M; Borghesi M; Baccos A; Morselli-Labate AM; Concetti S; Martorana G
    BJU Int; 2011 Oct; 108(8):1262-8. PubMed ID: 21446934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Extent of lymph node dissection improves survival in prostate cancer patients treated with radical prostatectomy without lymph node invasion.
    Preisser F; Bandini M; Marchioni M; Nazzani S; Tian Z; Pompe RS; Fossati N; Briganti A; Saad F; Shariat SF; Heinzer H; Huland H; Graefen M; Tilki D; Karakiewicz PI
    Prostate; 2018 May; 78(6):469-475. PubMed ID: 29460290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Can pelvic node dissection at radical prostatectomy influence the nodal recurrence at salvage lymphadenectomy for prostate cancer?
    Sivaraman A; Benfante N; Touijer K; Coleman J; Scardino P; Laudone V; Eastham J
    Investig Clin Urol; 2018 Mar; 59(2):83-90. PubMed ID: 29520383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Lymph node yield during radical prostatectomy does not impact rate of biochemical recurrence in patients with seminal vesicle invasion and node-negative disease.
    Badani KK; Reddy BN; Moskowitz EJ; Paulucci DJ; Beksac AT; Martini A; Whalen MJ; Skarecky DW; Huynh LM; Ahlering TE
    Urol Oncol; 2018 Jun; 36(6):310.e1-310.e6. PubMed ID: 29625782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Small-volume lymph node involvement and biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with extended lymph node dissection in prostate cancer.
    Morizane S; Honda M; Shimizu R; Teraoka S; Nishikawa R; Tsounapi P; Kimura Y; Iwamoto H; Hikita K; Takenaka A
    Int J Clin Oncol; 2020 Jul; 25(7):1398-1404. PubMed ID: 32333202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Standard of Care Versus Metastases-directed Therapy for PET-detected Nodal Oligorecurrent Prostate Cancer Following Multimodality Treatment: A Multi-institutional Case-control Study.
    Steuber T; Jilg C; Tennstedt P; De Bruycker A; Tilki D; Decaestecker K; Zilli T; Jereczek-Fossa BA; Wetterauer U; Grosu AL; Schultze-Seemann W; Heinzer H; Graefen M; Morlacco A; Karnes RJ; Ost P
    Eur Urol Focus; 2019 Nov; 5(6):1007-1013. PubMed ID: 29530632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessing the Best Surgical Template at Salvage Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection for Nodal Recurrence of Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy: When Can Bilateral Dissection be Omitted? Results from a Multi-institutional Series.
    Bravi CA; Fossati N; Gandaglia G; Suardi N; Mazzone E; Robesti D; Osmonov D; Juenemann KP; Boeri L; Jeffrey Karnes R; Kretschmer A; Buchner A; Stief C; Hiester A; Nini A; Albers P; Devos G; Joniau S; Van Poppel H; Shariat SF; Heidenreich A; Pfister D; Tilki D; Graefen M; Gill IS; Mottrie A; Karakiewicz PI; Montorsi F; Briganti A
    Eur Urol; 2020 Dec; 78(6):779-782. PubMed ID: 32624281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Role of Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection During Radical Prostatectomy in Patients With Gleason 6 Intermediate-risk Prostate Cancer.
    Mandel P; Kriegmair MC; Veleva V; Salomon G; Graefen M; Huland H; Tilki D
    Urology; 2016 Jul; 93():141-6. PubMed ID: 26968487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Radical prostatectomy represents an effective treatment in patients with specimen-confined high pathological Gleason score prostate cancer.
    Lughezzani G; Gallina A; Larcher A; Briganti A; Capitanio U; Suardi N; Lista G; Abrate A; Sangalli MN; Buffi N; Cestari A; Guazzoni G; Rigatti P; Montorsi F
    BJU Int; 2013 May; 111(5):723-30. PubMed ID: 22487441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reconsidering the role of pelvic lymph node dissection with radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer in an era of improving radiological staging techniques.
    Yaxley JW; Dagher J; Delahunt B; Egevad L; Srigley J; Samaratunga H
    World J Urol; 2018 Jan; 36(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 29116393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Stage T1-2 prostate cancer: a multivariate analysis of factors affecting biochemical and clinical failures after radical prostatectomy.
    Kupelian PA; Katcher J; Levin HS; Klein EA
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1997 Mar; 37(5):1043-52. PubMed ID: 9169811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Radical prostatectomy improves progression-free and cancer-specific survival in men with lymph node positive prostate cancer in the prostate-specific antigen era: a confirmatory study.
    Steuber T; Budäus L; Walz J; Zorn KC; Schlomm T; Chun F; Ahyai S; Fisch M; Sauter G; Huland H; Graefen M; Haese A
    BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(11):1755-61. PubMed ID: 20942833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The impact of the extent of lymph-node dissection on biochemical relapse after radical prostatectomy in node-negative patients.
    Schiavina R; Bertaccini A; Franceschelli A; Manferrari F; Vagnoni V; Borghesi M; Morselli-Labate AM; Martorana G
    Anticancer Res; 2010 Jun; 30(6):2297-302. PubMed ID: 20651383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.