284 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33075556)
1. Biophysically detailed forward modeling of the neural origin of EEG and MEG signals.
Næss S; Halnes G; Hagen E; Hagler DJ; Dale AM; Einevoll GT; Ness TV
Neuroimage; 2021 Jan; 225():117467. PubMed ID: 33075556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Human Neocortical Neurosolver (HNN), a new software tool for interpreting the cellular and network origin of human MEG/EEG data.
Neymotin SA; Daniels DS; Caldwell B; McDougal RA; Carnevale NT; Jas M; Moore CI; Hines ML; Hämäläinen M; Jones SR
Elife; 2020 Jan; 9():. PubMed ID: 31967544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Spatiotemporal forward solution of the EEG and MEG using network modeling.
Jirsa VK; Jantzen KJ; Fuchs A; Kelso JA
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2002 May; 21(5):493-504. PubMed ID: 12071620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Estimation of neural dynamics from MEG/EEG cortical current density maps: application to the reconstruction of large-scale cortical synchrony.
David O; Garnero L; Cosmelli D; Varela FJ
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 Sep; 49(9):975-87. PubMed ID: 12214887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Automated model selection in covariance estimation and spatial whitening of MEG and EEG signals.
Engemann DA; Gramfort A
Neuroimage; 2015 Mar; 108():328-42. PubMed ID: 25541187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cortical Signal Suppression (CSS) for Detection of Subcortical Activity Using MEG and EEG.
Samuelsson JG; Khan S; Sundaram P; Peled N; Hämäläinen MS
Brain Topogr; 2019 Mar; 32(2):215-228. PubMed ID: 30604048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Anatomically constrained minimum variance beamforming applied to EEG.
Murzin V; Fuchs A; Kelso JA
Exp Brain Res; 2011 Oct; 214(4):515-28. PubMed ID: 21915671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of a new MEG-EEG spatio-temporal localization approach using a realistic source model.
Schwartz DP; Badier JM; Bihoué P; Bouliou A
Brain Topogr; 1999; 11(4):279-89. PubMed ID: 10449259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cancellation of EEG and MEG signals generated by extended and distributed sources.
Ahlfors SP; Han J; Lin FH; Witzel T; Belliveau JW; Hämäläinen MS; Halgren E
Hum Brain Mapp; 2010 Jan; 31(1):140-9. PubMed ID: 19639553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Differences in MEG and EEG power-law scaling explained by a coupling between spatial coherence and frequency: a simulation study.
Bénar CG; Grova C; Jirsa VK; Lina JM
J Comput Neurosci; 2019 Aug; 47(1):31-41. PubMed ID: 31292816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. EEG and MEG coherence: measures of functional connectivity at distinct spatial scales of neocortical dynamics.
Srinivasan R; Winter WR; Ding J; Nunez PL
J Neurosci Methods; 2007 Oct; 166(1):41-52. PubMed ID: 17698205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Hyperedge bundling: A practical solution to spurious interactions in MEG/EEG source connectivity analyses.
Wang SH; Lobier M; Siebenhühner F; Puoliväli T; Palva S; Palva JM
Neuroimage; 2018 Jun; 173():610-622. PubMed ID: 29378318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Neuro-current response functions: A unified approach to MEG source analysis under the continuous stimuli paradigm.
Das P; Brodbeck C; Simon JZ; Babadi B
Neuroimage; 2020 May; 211():116528. PubMed ID: 31945510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Anatomically constrained dipole adjustment (ANACONDA) for accurate MEG/EEG focal source localizations.
Im CH; Jung HK; Fujimaki N
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Oct; 50(20):4931-53. PubMed ID: 16204881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Integrated MEG/EEG and fMRI model based on neural masses.
Babajani A; Soltanian-Zadeh H
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Sep; 53(9):1794-801. PubMed ID: 16941835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Direct reconstruction algorithm of current dipoles for vector magnetoencephalography and electroencephalography.
Nara T; Oohama J; Hashimoto M; Takeda T; Ando S
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(13):3859-79. PubMed ID: 17664582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Source analysis of median nerve stimulated somatosensory evoked potentials and fields using simultaneously measured EEG and MEG signals.
Mideksa KG; Hellriegel H; Hoogenboom N; Krause H; Schnitzler A; Deuschl G; Raethjen J; Heute U; Muthuraman M
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2012; 2012():4903-6. PubMed ID: 23367027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A novel integrated MEG and EEG analysis method for dipolar sources.
Huang MX; Song T; Hagler DJ; Podgorny I; Jousmaki V; Cui L; Gaa K; Harrington DL; Dale AM; Lee RR; Elman J; Halgren E
Neuroimage; 2007 Sep; 37(3):731-48. PubMed ID: 17658272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Anatomical constraints on source models for high-resolution EEG and MEG derived from MRI.
Srinivasan R
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2006 Aug; 5(4):389-99. PubMed ID: 16866569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Identifying true cortical interactions in MEG using the nulling beamformer.
Hui HB; Pantazis D; Bressler SL; Leahy RM
Neuroimage; 2010 Feb; 49(4):3161-74. PubMed ID: 19896541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
