These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. A unified Bayesian framework for MEG/EEG source imaging. Wipf D; Nagarajan S Neuroimage; 2009 Feb; 44(3):947-66. PubMed ID: 18602278 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. How to use fMRI functional localizers to improve EEG/MEG source estimation. Cottereau BR; Ales JM; Norcia AM J Neurosci Methods; 2015 Jul; 250():64-73. PubMed ID: 25088693 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of a new MEG-EEG spatio-temporal localization approach using a realistic source model. Schwartz DP; Badier JM; Bihoué P; Bouliou A Brain Topogr; 1999; 11(4):279-89. PubMed ID: 10449259 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Estimation of neural dynamics from MEG/EEG cortical current density maps: application to the reconstruction of large-scale cortical synchrony. David O; Garnero L; Cosmelli D; Varela FJ IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 Sep; 49(9):975-87. PubMed ID: 12214887 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Automated model selection in covariance estimation and spatial whitening of MEG and EEG signals. Engemann DA; Gramfort A Neuroimage; 2015 Mar; 108():328-42. PubMed ID: 25541187 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Monte Carlo simulation studies of EEG and MEG localization accuracy. Liu AK; Dale AM; Belliveau JW Hum Brain Mapp; 2002 May; 16(1):47-62. PubMed ID: 11870926 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Hyperedge bundling: A practical solution to spurious interactions in MEG/EEG source connectivity analyses. Wang SH; Lobier M; Siebenhühner F; Puoliväli T; Palva S; Palva JM Neuroimage; 2018 Jun; 173():610-622. PubMed ID: 29378318 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A novel integrated MEG and EEG analysis method for dipolar sources. Huang MX; Song T; Hagler DJ; Podgorny I; Jousmaki V; Cui L; Gaa K; Harrington DL; Dale AM; Lee RR; Elman J; Halgren E Neuroimage; 2007 Sep; 37(3):731-48. PubMed ID: 17658272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. EEG mismatch responses in a multimodal roving stimulus paradigm provide evidence for probabilistic inference across audition, somatosensation, and vision. Grundei M; Schröder P; Gijsen S; Blankenburg F Hum Brain Mapp; 2023 Jun; 44(9):3644-3668. PubMed ID: 37067073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sensitivity of EEG and MEG to the N1 and P2 auditory evoked responses modulated by spectral complexity of sounds. Shahin AJ; Roberts LE; Miller LM; McDonald KL; Alain C Brain Topogr; 2007; 20(2):55-61. PubMed ID: 17899352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparing dynamic causal models of neurovascular coupling with fMRI and EEG/MEG. Jafarian A; Litvak V; Cagnan H; Friston KJ; Zeidman P Neuroimage; 2020 Aug; 216():116734. PubMed ID: 32179105 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Combined mapping of human auditory EEG and MEG responses. Huotilainen M; Winkler I; Alho K; Escera C; Virtanen J; Ilmoniemi RJ; Jääskeläinen IP; Pekkonen E; Näätänen R Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1998 Jul; 108(4):370-9. PubMed ID: 9714379 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Multimodal integration of EEG and MEG data: a simulation study with variable signal-to-noise ratio and number of sensors. Babiloni F; Babiloni C; Carducci F; Romani GL; Rossini PM; Angelone LM; Cincotti F Hum Brain Mapp; 2004 May; 22(1):52-62. PubMed ID: 15083526 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bayesian fusion and multimodal DCM for EEG and fMRI. Wei H; Jafarian A; Zeidman P; Litvak V; Razi A; Hu D; Friston KJ Neuroimage; 2020 May; 211():116595. PubMed ID: 32027965 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]