These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

384 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33075561)

  • 21. Bayesian fusion and multimodal DCM for EEG and fMRI.
    Wei H; Jafarian A; Zeidman P; Litvak V; Razi A; Hu D; Friston KJ
    Neuroimage; 2020 May; 211():116595. PubMed ID: 32027965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A probabilistic algorithm integrating source localization and noise suppression for MEG and EEG data.
    Zumer JM; Attias HT; Sekihara K; Nagarajan SS
    Neuroimage; 2007 Aug; 37(1):102-15. PubMed ID: 17574444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Reproducibility of EEG-MEG fusion source analysis of interictal spikes: Relevance in presurgical evaluation of epilepsy.
    Chowdhury RA; Pellegrino G; Aydin Ü; Lina JM; Dubeau F; Kobayashi E; Grova C
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2018 Feb; 39(2):880-901. PubMed ID: 29164737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Bayesian Algorithm Based Localization of EEG Recorded Electromagnetic Brain Activity.
    Jatoi MA; Kamel N; Musavi SHA; López JD
    Curr Med Imaging Rev; 2019; 15(2):184-193. PubMed ID: 31975664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Dynamic causal modeling of evoked responses in EEG and MEG.
    David O; Kiebel SJ; Harrison LM; Mattout J; Kilner JM; Friston KJ
    Neuroimage; 2006 May; 30(4):1255-72. PubMed ID: 16473023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. An automatic procedure for the analysis of electric and magnetic mismatch negativity based on anatomical brain mapping.
    Zvyagintsev M; Thönnessen H; Dammers J; Boers F; Mathiak K
    J Neurosci Methods; 2008 Mar; 168(2):325-33. PubMed ID: 18093661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Differences between MEG and high-density EEG source localizations using a distributed source model in comparison to fMRI.
    Klamer S; Elshahabi A; Lerche H; Braun C; Erb M; Scheffler K; Focke NK
    Brain Topogr; 2015 Jan; 28(1):87-94. PubMed ID: 25296614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Empirical Bayesian localization of event-related time-frequency neural activity dynamics.
    Cai C; Hinkley L; Gao Y; Hashemi A; Haufe S; Sekihara K; Nagarajan SS
    Neuroimage; 2022 Sep; 258():119369. PubMed ID: 35700943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Cortical Signal Suppression (CSS) for Detection of Subcortical Activity Using MEG and EEG.
    Samuelsson JG; Khan S; Sundaram P; Peled N; Hämäläinen MS
    Brain Topogr; 2019 Mar; 32(2):215-228. PubMed ID: 30604048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Bayesian model averaging in EEG/MEG imaging.
    Trujillo-Barreto NJ; Aubert-Vázquez E; Valdés-Sosa PA
    Neuroimage; 2004 Apr; 21(4):1300-19. PubMed ID: 15050557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Bayesian M/EEG source reconstruction with spatio-temporal priors.
    Trujillo-Barreto NJ; Aubert-Vázquez E; Penny WD
    Neuroimage; 2008 Jan; 39(1):318-35. PubMed ID: 17904869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Multimodal functional imaging using fMRI-informed regional EEG/MEG source estimation.
    Oun W; Numënmaa A; Hämäläinen M; Golland P
    Inf Process Med Imaging; 2009; 21():88-100. PubMed ID: 19694255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. MEG source localization under multiple constraints: an extended Bayesian framework.
    Mattout J; Phillips C; Penny WD; Rugg MD; Friston KJ
    Neuroimage; 2006 Apr; 30(3):753-67. PubMed ID: 16368248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Anatomically constrained dipole adjustment (ANACONDA) for accurate MEG/EEG focal source localizations.
    Im CH; Jung HK; Fujimaki N
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Oct; 50(20):4931-53. PubMed ID: 16204881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Sparsity enables estimation of both subcortical and cortical activity from MEG and EEG.
    Krishnaswamy P; Obregon-Henao G; Ahveninen J; Khan S; Babadi B; Iglesias JE; Hämäläinen MS; Purdon PL
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2017 Nov; 114(48):E10465-E10474. PubMed ID: 29138310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Neuro-current response functions: A unified approach to MEG source analysis under the continuous stimuli paradigm.
    Das P; Brodbeck C; Simon JZ; Babadi B
    Neuroimage; 2020 May; 211():116528. PubMed ID: 31945510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. μ-STAR: A novel framework for spatio-temporal M/EEG source imaging optimized by microstates.
    Feng Z; Wang S; Qian L; Xu M; Wu K; Kakkos I; Guan C; Sun Y
    Neuroimage; 2023 Nov; 282():120372. PubMed ID: 37748558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Predicting EEG responses using MEG sources in superior temporal gyrus reveals source asynchrony in patients with schizophrenia.
    Huang MX; Edgar JC; Thoma RJ; Hanlon FM; Moses SN; Lee RR; Paulson KM; Weisend MP; Irwin JG; Bustillo JR; Adler LE; Miller GA; Canive JM
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2003 May; 114(5):835-50. PubMed ID: 12738429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. EEG and MEG coherence: measures of functional connectivity at distinct spatial scales of neocortical dynamics.
    Srinivasan R; Winter WR; Ding J; Nunez PL
    J Neurosci Methods; 2007 Oct; 166(1):41-52. PubMed ID: 17698205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. EEG and MEG data analysis in SPM8.
    Litvak V; Mattout J; Kiebel S; Phillips C; Henson R; Kilner J; Barnes G; Oostenveld R; Daunizeau J; Flandin G; Penny W; Friston K
    Comput Intell Neurosci; 2011; 2011():852961. PubMed ID: 21437221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.