These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 330757)

  • 1. Immunocycte stimulation in vitro by nontoxic bacterial lipopolysaccharide derivatives.
    Frank S; Specter S; Nowotny A; Friedman H
    J Immunol; 1977 Sep; 119(3):855-60. PubMed ID: 330757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Distinctive immunomodulatory effects of endotoxin and nontoxic lipopolysaccharide derivatives in lymphoid cell cultures.
    Friedman H; Blanchard DK; Newton C; Klein T; Stewart W; Keler T; Nowotny A
    J Biol Response Mod; 1987 Dec; 6(6):664-77. PubMed ID: 2453617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of an acidic polysaccharide procuced by Serratia piscatorum on immune responses in mice. I. mitogenicity and stimulation of plaque-forming cells (PFC) in vitro.
    Matsumoto T; Shimonishi C; Ootsu K
    J Immunol; 1975 May; 114(5):1574-80. PubMed ID: 1091705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. LPS regulation of the immune response: separate mechanisms for murine B cell activation by lipid A (direct) and polysaccharide (macrophage-dependent) derived from Bacteroides LPS.
    Williamson SI; Wannemuehler MJ; Jirillo E; Pritchard DG; Michalek SM; McGhee JR
    J Immunol; 1984 Nov; 133(5):2294-300. PubMed ID: 6332842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. LPS regulation of the immune response: Bacteroides endotoxin induces mitogenic, polyclonal, and antibody responses in classical LPS responsive but not C3H/HeJ mice.
    Wannemuehler MJ; Michalek SM; Jirillo E; Williamson SI; Hirasawa M; McGhee JR
    J Immunol; 1984 Jul; 133(1):299-305. PubMed ID: 6202784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Epitope-specific antibody feedback regulation of the humoral immune response against sheep erythrocytes in vitro: specific effects of anti-antigen antibody vs nonspecific T cell activities.
    Zubler RH
    J Immunol; 1981 Feb; 126(2):557-62. PubMed ID: 6161182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Modulation of immune response by bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS): cellular basis of stimulatory and inhibitory effects of LPS on the in vitro IgM antibody response to a T-dependent antigen.
    Uchiyama T; Jacobs DM
    J Immunol; 1978 Dec; 121(6):2347-51. PubMed ID: 309900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Endotoxin-induced T lymphocyte proliferation.
    Vogel SN; Hilfiker ML; Caulfield MJ
    J Immunol; 1983 Apr; 130(4):1774-9. PubMed ID: 6601137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Preferential induction of autoantibody secretion in polyclonal activation by peptidoglycan and lipopolysaccharide. I. In vitro studies.
    Dziarski R
    J Immunol; 1982 Mar; 128(3):1018-25. PubMed ID: 7035553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Interferon-gamma induction by lipopolysaccharide: dependence on interleukin 2 and macrophages.
    Blanchard DK; Djeu JY; Klein TW; Friedman H; Stewart WE
    J Immunol; 1986 Feb; 136(3):963-70. PubMed ID: 2867114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Murine immune responses to Salmonella lipopolysaccharide: oral administration of whole bacteria to C3H/HeJ mice induces secondary anti-LPS responses, especially of the IgA isotype.
    Jirillo E; Kiyono H; Michalek SM; McGhee JR
    J Immunol; 1984 Apr; 132(4):1702-11. PubMed ID: 6366051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Synergy between T cell-replacing factor and bacterial lipopolysaccharides (LPS) in the primary antibody response in vitro: a model for lipopolysaccharide adjuvant action.
    Jacobs DM
    J Immunol; 1979 Apr; 122(4):1421-6. PubMed ID: 376717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Modulation of the immune response to lipopolysaccharide.
    Hiernaux JR; Baker PJ; Delisi C; Rudbach JA
    J Immunol; 1982 Mar; 128(3):1054-8. PubMed ID: 7035556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of concanavalin A on the in vitro responses of mouse spleen cells to T-dependent and T-independent antigens.
    Jacobs DM
    J Immunol; 1975 Jan; 114(1 Pt 2):365-70. PubMed ID: 1090654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Modulation of immune response by bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS): multifocal effects of LPS-induced suppression of the primary antibody response to a T-dependent antigen.
    Uchiyama T; Jacobs DM
    J Immunol; 1978 Dec; 121(6):2340-6. PubMed ID: 363944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of in vitro and in vivo mitogenic and polyclonal antibody and autoantibody responses to peptidoglycan, LPS, protein A, PWM, PHA and Con A in normal and autoimmune mice.
    Dziarski R
    J Clin Lab Immunol; 1985 Feb; 16(2):93-109. PubMed ID: 3886911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A reappraisal of "T-independent" antigens. I. Effect of lymphokines on the response of single adult hapten-specific B lymphocytes.
    Pike BL; Nossal GJ
    J Immunol; 1984 Apr; 132(4):1687-95. PubMed ID: 6199407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. In vivo studies on suppressor lymphocyte activity following administration of Escherichia coli O138 lipopolysaccharide.
    Allan D; Crampton FI; Jenkins P
    Res Vet Sci; 1978 Sep; 25(2):168-72. PubMed ID: 364576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of staphylococcal enterotoxins on the primary in vitro immune response.
    Smith BG; Johnson HM
    J Immunol; 1975 Aug; 115(2):575-8. PubMed ID: 1097520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of a bacterial vaccine on tumors and the immune response of ICR/Ha mice.
    Havas HF; Schiffman G; Bushnell B; Dellaria M; Axelrod RS; Shanahan T; Burns MM; Guan CF
    J Biol Response Mod; 1990 Apr; 9(2):194-204. PubMed ID: 2187952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.