These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33076975)

  • 1. Comparison of a traditional systematic review approach with review-of-reviews and semi-automation as strategies to update the evidence.
    Reddy SM; Patel S; Weyrich M; Fenton J; Viswanathan M
    Syst Rev; 2020 Oct; 9(1):243. PubMed ID: 33076975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Performance and usability of machine learning for screening in systematic reviews: a comparative evaluation of three tools.
    Gates A; Guitard S; Pillay J; Elliott SA; Dyson MP; Newton AS; Hartling L
    Syst Rev; 2019 Nov; 8(1):278. PubMed ID: 31727150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Faster title and abstract screening? Evaluating Abstrackr, a semi-automated online screening program for systematic reviewers.
    Rathbone J; Hoffmann T; Glasziou P
    Syst Rev; 2015 Jun; 4():80. PubMed ID: 26073974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The semi-automation of title and abstract screening: a retrospective exploration of ways to leverage Abstrackr's relevance predictions in systematic and rapid reviews.
    Gates A; Gates M; Sebastianski M; Guitard S; Elliott SA; Hartling L
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Jun; 20(1):139. PubMed ID: 32493228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluating the efficacy of artificial intelligence tools for the automation of systematic reviews in cancer research: A systematic review.
    Yao X; Kumar MV; Su E; Flores Miranda A; Saha A; Sussman J
    Cancer Epidemiol; 2024 Feb; 88():102511. PubMed ID: 38071872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of text mining to reduce screening workload for injury-focused systematic reviews.
    Giummarra MJ; Lau G; Gabbe BJ
    Inj Prev; 2020 Feb; 26(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 31451565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Automation of systematic reviews of biomedical literature: a scoping review of studies indexed in PubMed.
    Tóth B; Berek L; Gulácsi L; Péntek M; Zrubka Z
    Syst Rev; 2024 Jul; 13(1):174. PubMed ID: 38978132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Technology-assisted title and abstract screening for systematic reviews: a retrospective evaluation of the Abstrackr machine learning tool.
    Gates A; Johnson C; Hartling L
    Syst Rev; 2018 Mar; 7(1):45. PubMed ID: 29530097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Machine learning for screening prioritization in systematic reviews: comparative performance of Abstrackr and EPPI-Reviewer.
    Tsou AY; Treadwell JR; Erinoff E; Schoelles K
    Syst Rev; 2020 Apr; 9(1):73. PubMed ID: 32241297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A text-mining tool generated title-abstract screening workload savings: performance evaluation versus single-human screening.
    Carey N; Harte M; Mc Cullagh L
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2022 Sep; 149():53-59. PubMed ID: 35654270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Semi-automated screening of biomedical citations for systematic reviews.
    Wallace BC; Trikalinos TA; Lau J; Brodley C; Schmid CH
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2010 Jan; 11():55. PubMed ID: 20102628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Text mining to support abstract screening for knowledge syntheses: a semi-automated workflow.
    Pham B; Jovanovic J; Bagheri E; Antony J; Ashoor H; Nguyen TT; Rios P; Robson R; Thomas SM; Watt J; Straus SE; Tricco AC
    Syst Rev; 2021 May; 10(1):156. PubMed ID: 34039433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sensitivity and Specificity of Using GPT-3.5 Turbo Models for Title and Abstract Screening in Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses.
    Tran VT; Gartlehner G; Yaacoub S; Boutron I; Schwingshackl L; Stadelmaier J; Sommer I; Alebouyeh F; Afach S; Meerpohl J; Ravaud P
    Ann Intern Med; 2024 Jun; 177(6):791-799. PubMed ID: 38768452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Decoding semi-automated title-abstract screening: findings from a convenience sample of reviews.
    Gates A; Gates M; DaRosa D; Elliott SA; Pillay J; Rahman S; Vandermeer B; Hartling L
    Syst Rev; 2020 Nov; 9(1):272. PubMed ID: 33243276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Semi-automated Tools for Systematic Searches.
    Adam GP; Wallace BC; Trikalinos TA
    Methods Mol Biol; 2022; 2345():17-40. PubMed ID: 34550582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Machine learning algorithms for systematic review: reducing workload in a preclinical review of animal studies and reducing human screening error.
    Bannach-Brown A; Przybyła P; Thomas J; Rice ASC; Ananiadou S; Liao J; Macleod MR
    Syst Rev; 2019 Jan; 8(1):23. PubMed ID: 30646959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A semi-supervised approach using label propagation to support citation screening.
    Kontonatsios G; Brockmeier AJ; Przybyła P; McNaught J; Mu T; Goulermas JY; Ananiadou S
    J Biomed Inform; 2017 Aug; 72():67-76. PubMed ID: 28648605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Tools to support the automation of systematic reviews: a scoping review.
    Khalil H; Ameen D; Zarnegar A
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2022 Apr; 144():22-42. PubMed ID: 34896236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.