208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33077373)
1. Long-term survival after minimally invasive resection versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary cancers: a systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression.
Kamarajah SK; Gujjuri R; Bundred JR; Hilal MA; White SA
HPB (Oxford); 2021 Feb; 23(2):197-205. PubMed ID: 33077373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The clinical implication of minimally invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for non-pancreatic periampullary cancer: a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis.
Uijterwijk BA; Kasai M; Lemmers DHL; Chinnusamy P; van Hilst J; Ielpo B; Wei K; Song KB; Kim SC; Klompmaker S; Jang JY; Herremans KM; Bencini L; Coratti A; Mazzola M; Menon KV; Goh BKP; Qin R; Besselink MG; Abu Hilal M;
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2023 Aug; 408(1):311. PubMed ID: 37581763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Minimally invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Individual patient data meta-analysis of randomized trials.
Uijterwijk BA; Wei K; Kasai M; Ielpo B; Hilst JV; Chinnusamy P; Lemmers DHL; Burdio F; Senthilnathan P; Besselink MG; Abu Hilal M; Qin R
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2023 Aug; 49(8):1351-1361. PubMed ID: 37076411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Minimally invasive versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy for distal bile duct cancer: an inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis of outcomes.
Lee W; Song KB; Hong S; Park Y; Kwak BJ; Jun E; Hwang DW; Kim S; Lee JH; Kim SC
Surg Endosc; 2023 Feb; 37(2):881-890. PubMed ID: 36018360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparing Short-term and Oncologic Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy Across Low and High Volume Centers.
Torphy RJ; Friedman C; Halpern A; Chapman BC; Ahrendt SS; McCarter MM; Edil BH; Schulick RD; Gleisner A
Ann Surg; 2019 Dec; 270(6):1147-1155. PubMed ID: 29771723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The experience of the minimally invasive (MI) fellowship-trained (FT) hepatic-pancreatic and biliary (HPB) surgeon: could the outcome of MI pancreatoduodenectomy for peri-ampullary tumors be better than open?
Gumbs AA; Chouillard E; Abu Hilal M; Croner R; Gayet B; Gagner M
Surg Endosc; 2021 Sep; 35(9):5256-5267. PubMed ID: 33146810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Wrapping double-mattress anastomosis for pancreaticojejunostomy in minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy can significantly reduce postoperative pancreatic fistula rate compared with conventional pancreaticojejunostomy in open surgery: An analysis of a propensity score-matched sample.
Kiguchi G; Sugioka A; Uchida Y; Yoshikawa J; Nakauchi M; Kojima M; Tanahashi Y; Takahara T; Yasuda A; Suda K; Kato Y; Uyama I
Surg Oncol; 2021 Sep; 38():101577. PubMed ID: 33887674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Minimally invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic and peri-ampullary neoplasm (DIPLOMA-2): study protocol for an international multicenter patient-blinded randomized controlled trial.
de Graaf N; Emmen AMLH; Ramera M; Björnsson B; Boggi U; Bruna CL; Busch OR; Daams F; Ferrari G; Festen S; van Hilst J; D'Hondt M; Ielpo B; Keck T; Khatkov IE; Koerkamp BG; Lips DJ; Luyer MDP; Mieog JSD; Morelli L; Molenaar IQ; van Santvoort HC; Sprangers MAG; Ferrari C; Berkhof J; Maisonneuve P; Abu Hilal M; Besselink MG;
Trials; 2023 Oct; 24(1):665. PubMed ID: 37828593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary disease: a comprehensive review of literature and meta-analysis of outcomes compared with open surgery.
Chen K; Pan Y; Liu XL; Jiang GY; Wu D; Maher H; Cai XJ
BMC Gastroenterol; 2017 Nov; 17(1):120. PubMed ID: 29169337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Improved outcomes with minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients with dilated pancreatic ducts: a prospective study.
Cos H; LeCompte MT; Srinivasa S; Zarate Rodriguez J; Woolsey CA; Williams G; Patel S; Khan A; Fields RC; Majella Doyle MB; Chapman WC; Strasberg SM; Hawkins WG; Hammill CW; Sanford DE
Surg Endosc; 2022 May; 36(5):3100-3109. PubMed ID: 34235587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Minimally invasive surgical approach versus open procedure for pancreaticoduodenectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Wang S; Shi N; You L; Dai M; Zhao Y
Medicine (Baltimore); 2017 Dec; 96(50):e8619. PubMed ID: 29390259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Robotic approach mitigates the effect of major complications on survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary cancer.
Meyyappan T; Wilson GC; Zeh HJ; Hogg ME; Lee KK; Zureikat AH; Paniccia A
Surg Endosc; 2023 Feb; 37(2):1181-1187. PubMed ID: 36163566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Expanding laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy to pancreatic-head and periampullary malignancy: major findings based on systematic review and meta-analysis.
Chen K; Liu XL; Pan Y; Maher H; Wang XF
BMC Gastroenterol; 2018 Jul; 18(1):102. PubMed ID: 29969999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Minimally Invasive Pancreaticoduodenectomy in Elderly Patients: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Zhu J; Wang G; Du P; He J; Li Y
World J Surg; 2021 Apr; 45(4):1186-1201. PubMed ID: 33458781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Retrospective comparison of robot-assisted minimally invasive versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary neoplasms.
Bao PQ; Mazirka PO; Watkins KT
J Gastrointest Surg; 2014 Apr; 18(4):682-9. PubMed ID: 24234245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula: Is Minimally Invasive Surgery Better than Open? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Petrucciani N; Crovetto A; DE Felice F; Pace M; Giulitti D; Yusef M; Nigri G; Valabrega S; Kassir R; D'Angelo F; Debs T; Ramacciato G; Aurello P
Anticancer Res; 2022 Jul; 42(7):3285-3298. PubMed ID: 35790274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Short-term outcomes after minimally invasive versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy in elderly patients: a propensity score-matched analysis.
Yin SM; Liu YW; Liu YY; Yong CC; Wang CC; Li WF; Yeh CH
BMC Surg; 2021 Jan; 21(1):60. PubMed ID: 33494734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Systematic review and meta-analysis of minimally invasive versus open approach for pancreaticoduodenectomy.
Zhang H; Wu X; Zhu F; Shen M; Tian R; Shi C; Wang X; Xiao G; Guo X; Wang M; Qin R
Surg Endosc; 2016 Dec; 30(12):5173-5184. PubMed ID: 27005287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Laparoscopic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: long-term results at a single institution.
Stauffer JA; Coppola A; Villacreses D; Mody K; Johnson E; Li Z; Asbun HJ
Surg Endosc; 2017 May; 31(5):2233-2241. PubMed ID: 27604369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy is associated with lower morbidity compared to open pancreatoduodenectomy: An updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and high-quality nonrandomized studies.
Yan JF; Pan Y; Chen K; Zhu HP; Chen QL
Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Aug; 98(32):e16730. PubMed ID: 31393381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
