252 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33077779)
1. Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with clipless intrafascial neurovascular bundle-sparing approach: surgical technique and one-year functional and oncologic outcomes.
Shin TY; Lee YS
Sci Rep; 2020 Oct; 10(1):17595. PubMed ID: 33077779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Erectile Function and Oncologic Outcomes Following Open Retropubic and Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Results from the LAParoscopic Prostatectomy Robot Open Trial.
Sooriakumaran P; Pini G; Nyberg T; Derogar M; Carlsson S; Stranne J; Bjartell A; Hugosson J; Steineck G; Wiklund PN
Eur Urol; 2018 Apr; 73(4):618-627. PubMed ID: 28882327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Retrograde Release of the Neurovascular Bundle with Preservation of Dorsal Venous Complex During Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Optimizing Functional Outcomes.
de Carvalho PA; Barbosa JABA; Guglielmetti GB; Cordeiro MD; Rocco B; Nahas WC; Patel V; Coelho RF
Eur Urol; 2020 May; 77(5):628-635. PubMed ID: 30041833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Significance of erection hardness score as a diagnostic tool to assess erectile function recovery in Japanese men after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Miyake H; Miyazaki A; Yao A; Hinata N; Fujisawa M
J Robot Surg; 2016 Sep; 10(3):221-6. PubMed ID: 26994775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Functional Recovery, Oncologic Outcomes and Postoperative Complications after Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: An Evidence-Based Analysis Comparing the Retzius Sparing and Standard Approaches.
Menon M; Dalela D; Jamil M; Diaz M; Tallman C; Abdollah F; Sood A; Lehtola L; Miller D; Jeong W
J Urol; 2018 May; 199(5):1210-1217. PubMed ID: 29225060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Nerve-sparing in salvage robot-assisted prostatectomy: surgical technique, oncological and functional outcomes at a single high-volume institution.
Bonet X; Ogaya-Pinies G; Woodlief T; Hernandez-Cardona E; Ganapathi H; Rogers T; Coelho RF; Rocco B; Vigués F; Patel V
BJU Int; 2018 Nov; 122(5):837-844. PubMed ID: 30126045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A prediction model relating the extent of intraoperative fascia preservation to erectile dysfunction after nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
KleinJan GH; Sikorska K; Korne CM; Brouwer OR; Buckle T; Tillier C; van der Roest RCM; de Jong J; van Leeuwen FWB; van der Poel HG
J Robot Surg; 2019 Jun; 13(3):455-462. PubMed ID: 30178300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Recovery of Baseline Erectile Function in Men Following Radical Prostatectomy for High-Risk Prostate Cancer: A Prospective Analysis Using Validated Measures.
Sridhar AN; Cathcart PJ; Yap T; Hines J; Nathan S; Briggs TP; Kelly JD; Minhas S
J Sex Med; 2016 Mar; 13(3):435-43. PubMed ID: 26944466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Toggling Technique Allows Retrograde Early Release to Facilitate Neurovascular Bundle Sparing During Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Propensity Score-Matching Study.
Shim JS; Tae JH; Noh TI; Kang SH; Cheon J; Lee JG; Patel VR; Kang SG
J Korean Med Sci; 2022 Jan; 37(1):e6. PubMed ID: 34981681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Current status of various neurovascular bundle-sparing techniques in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Kumar A; Tandon S; Samavedi S; Mouraviev V; Bates AS; Patel VR
J Robot Surg; 2016 Sep; 10(3):187-200. PubMed ID: 27251473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Detrusorrhaphy and Intrafascial Nerve-Sparing During Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy on Recovery of Continence and Potency: Surgical Feasibility, One-Year Functional and Oncologic Outcomes.
Lee YS; Shin TY
Urol J; 2020 Jul; 18(3):314-321. PubMed ID: 32715457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Retrospective Concomitant Nonrandomized Comparison of "Touch" Cautery Versus Athermal Dissection of the Prostatic Vascular Pedicles and Neurovascular Bundles During Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy.
Hofmann M; Huang E; Huynh LM; Kaler K; Vernez S; Gordon A; Morales B; Skarecky D; Ahlering TE
Eur Urol; 2022 Jan; 81(1):104-109. PubMed ID: 34384621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of Starting Penile Rehabilitation with Sildenafil Immediately after Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy on Erectile Function Recovery: A Prospective Randomized Trial.
Jo JK; Jeong SJ; Oh JJ; Lee SW; Lee S; Hong SK; Byun SS; Lee SE
J Urol; 2018 Jun; 199(6):1600-1606. PubMed ID: 29307683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pathological confirmation of nerve-sparing types performed during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).
Ko WJ; Hruby GW; Turk AT; Landman J; Badani KK
BJU Int; 2013 Mar; 111(3):451-8. PubMed ID: 22900712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Chitosan membranes applied on the prostatic neurovascular bundles after nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a phase II study.
Porpiglia F; Bertolo R; Fiori C; Manfredi M; De Cillis S; Geuna S
BJU Int; 2018 Mar; 121(3):472-478. PubMed ID: 28710845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Optimal strategy for penile rehabilitation after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy based on preoperative erectile function.
Basal S; Wambi C; Acikel C; Gupta M; Badani K
BJU Int; 2013 Apr; 111(4):658-65. PubMed ID: 23186312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Use of a hyaluronic acid-carboxymethylcellulose adhesion barrier on the neurovascular bundle and prostatic bed to facilitate earlier recovery of erectile function after robot-assisted prostatectomy: an initial experience.
Joung JY; Ha YS; Singer EA; Ercolani MC; Favaretto RL; Lee DH; Kim WJ; Lee KH; Kim IY
J Endourol; 2013 Oct; 27(10):1230-5. PubMed ID: 23879531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Stepwise approach for nerve sparing without countertraction during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: technique and outcomes.
Kowalczyk KJ; Huang AC; Hevelone ND; Lipsitz SR; Yu HY; Ulmer WD; Kaplan JR; Patel S; Nguyen PL; Hu JC
Eur Urol; 2011 Sep; 60(3):536-47. PubMed ID: 21620561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. NeuroSAFE PROOF: study protocol for a single-blinded, IDEAL stage 3, multi-centre, randomised controlled trial of NeuroSAFE robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy versus standard robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy in men with localized prostate cancer.
Dinneen E; Grierson J; Almeida-Magana R; Clow R; Haider A; Allen C; Heffernan-Ho D; Freeman A; Briggs T; Nathan S; Mallett S; Brew-Graves C; Muirhead N; Williams NR; Pizzo E; Persad R; Aning J; Johnson L; Oxley J; Oakley N; Morgan S; Tahir F; Ahmad I; Dutto L; Salmond JM; Kelkar A; Kelly J; Shaw G
Trials; 2022 Jul; 23(1):584. PubMed ID: 35869497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. How to optimize patient selection for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: functional outcome analyses from a tertiary referral center.
Gandaglia G; Suardi N; Gallina A; Zaffuto E; Cucchiara V; Vizziello D; Shariat S; Cantiello F; Damiano R; Guazzoni G; Montorsi F; Briganti A
J Endourol; 2014 Jul; 28(7):792-800. PubMed ID: 24660774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
