These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

253 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33077918)

  • 21. A versatile all-channel stimulator for electrode arrays, with real-time control.
    Wagenaar DA; Potter SM
    J Neural Eng; 2004 Mar; 1(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 15876621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Ruthenium oxide based microelectrode arrays for in vitro and in vivo neural recording and stimulation.
    Atmaramani R; Chakraborty B; Rihani RT; Usoro J; Hammack A; Abbott J; Nnoromele P; Black BJ; Pancrazio JJ; Cogan SF
    Acta Biomater; 2020 Jan; 101():565-574. PubMed ID: 31678740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Scaling limitations of laser-fabricated nerve electrode arrays.
    Henle C; Schuettler M; Ordonez JS; Stieglitz T
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2008; 2008():4208-11. PubMed ID: 19163640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A modular 256-channel micro electrode array platform for in vitro and in vivo neural stimulation and recording: BioMEA.
    Charvet G; Billoint O; Gharbi S; Heuschkel M; Georges C; Kauffmann T; Pellissier A; Yvert B; Guillemaud R
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2010; 2010():1804-7. PubMed ID: 21095937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Implantable microscale neural interfaces.
    Cheung KC
    Biomed Microdevices; 2007 Dec; 9(6):923-38. PubMed ID: 17252207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of PEDOT microelectrodes for neural stimulation and recording.
    Venkatraman S; Hendricks J; King ZA; Sereno AJ; Richardson-Burns S; Martin D; Carmena JM
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2011 Jun; 19(3):307-16. PubMed ID: 21292598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Microbial electrochemical technologies: Electronic circuitry and characterization tools.
    Sánchez C; Dessì P; Duffy M; Lens PNL
    Biosens Bioelectron; 2020 Feb; 150():111884. PubMed ID: 31780409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Neuroadhesive protein coating improves the chronic performance of neuroelectronics in mouse brain.
    Golabchi A; Woeppel KM; Li X; Lagenaur CF; Cui XT
    Biosens Bioelectron; 2020 May; 155():112096. PubMed ID: 32090868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Chronic recording and electrochemical performance of Utah microelectrode arrays implanted in rat motor cortex.
    Black BJ; Kanneganti A; Joshi-Imre A; Rihani R; Chakraborty B; Abbott J; Pancrazio JJ; Cogan SF
    J Neurophysiol; 2018 Oct; 120(4):2083-2090. PubMed ID: 30020844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Implantable neurotechnologies: a review of micro- and nanoelectrodes for neural recording.
    Patil AC; Thakor NV
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2016 Jan; 54(1):23-44. PubMed ID: 26753777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Optimizing the neuron-electrode interface for chronic bioelectronic interfacing.
    Keogh C
    Neurosurg Focus; 2020 Jul; 49(1):E7. PubMed ID: 32610294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Instrumentation: carbon nanotubes on the brain.
    Parpura V
    Nat Nanotechnol; 2008 Jul; 3(7):384-5. PubMed ID: 18654560
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of Mono-, Bi-, and Tripolar Configurations for Stimulation and Recording With an Interfascicular Interface.
    Nielsen TN; Sevcencu C; Struijk JJ
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2014 Jan; 22(1):88-95. PubMed ID: 23981544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. In vitro and in vivo charge capacity of AIROF microelectrodes.
    Hu Z; Troyk PR; Brawn TP; Margoliash D; Cogan SF
    Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2006; 2006():886-9. PubMed ID: 17946869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A novel fabrication method of carbon electrodes using 3D printing and chemical modification process.
    Tian P; Chen C; Hu J; Qi J; Wang Q; Chen JC; Cavanaugh J; Peng Y; Cheng MM
    Biomed Microdevices; 2017 Nov; 20(1):4. PubMed ID: 29170867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Stretchable Transparent Electrode Arrays for Simultaneous Electrical and Optical Interrogation of Neural Circuits in Vivo.
    Zhang J; Liu X; Xu W; Luo W; Li M; Chu F; Xu L; Cao A; Guan J; Tang S; Duan X
    Nano Lett; 2018 May; 18(5):2903-2911. PubMed ID: 29608857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effect of planar microelectrode geometry on neuron stimulation: finite element modeling and experimental validation of the efficient electrode shape.
    Ghazavi A; Westwick D; Xu F; Wijdenes P; Syed N; Dalton C
    J Neurosci Methods; 2015 Jun; 248():51-8. PubMed ID: 25845480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Nanomaterials in electrochemical cytosensors.
    Xu J; Hu Y; Wang S; Ma X; Guo J
    Analyst; 2020 Mar; 145(6):2058-2069. PubMed ID: 32043495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Microfabricated cylindrical multielectrodes for neural stimulation.
    Snow S; Jacobsen SC; Wells DL; Horch KW
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Feb; 53(2):320-6. PubMed ID: 16485761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A novel technique for increasing charge injection capacity of neural electrodes for efficacious and safe neural stimulation.
    Negi S; Bhandari R; Solzbacher F
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2012; 2012():5142-5. PubMed ID: 23367086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.