These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33078119)
1. Comparison between two autorefractor performances in large scale vision screening in Chinese school age children. Wang D; Jin N; Pei RX; Zhao LQ; Du B; Liu GH; Wang XL; Wei RH; Li XR Int J Ophthalmol; 2020; 13(10):1660-1666. PubMed ID: 33078119 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of the new self-contained darkroom refractive screener versus table-top autorefractor and cycloplegia retinoscopy in detecting refractive error. Wei X; Li L; Jiang L; Lu H; Huang H; Zhong D; Pan L; Wei D; Han Y; Lin H; Chen Q BMC Ophthalmol; 2023 Nov; 23(1):487. PubMed ID: 38012552 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of cycloplegic refraction between Grand Seiko autorefractor and Retinomax autorefractor in the Vision in Preschoolers-Hyperopia in Preschoolers (VIP-HIP) Study. Ying GS; Maguire MG; Kulp MT; Ciner E; Moore B; Pistilli M; Candy R; J AAPOS; 2017 Jun; 21(3):219-223.e3. PubMed ID: 28528993 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Comparison between binocular, open-field auto ref/keratometer and conventional autorefractor]. Wan XH; Lin Z; Cai XG; Qiao LY; Yang XD; Wang NL; Liang YB Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Jun; 48(6):519-23. PubMed ID: 22943807 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical evaluation of autorefraction and subjective refraction with and without cycloplegia in Chinese school-aged children: a cross-sectional study. Guo R; Shi L; Xu K; Hong D Transl Pediatr; 2022 Jun; 11(6):933-946. PubMed ID: 35800271 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Open versus closed view autorefraction in young adults. Nagra M; Akhtar A; Huntjens B; Campbell P J Optom; 2021; 14(1):86-91. PubMed ID: 32792330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Sankara Nethralaya Tamil Nadu Essilor Myopia (STEM) Study-Defining a Threshold for Non-Cycloplegic Myopia Prevalence in Children. Gopalakrishnan A; Hussaindeen JR; Sivaraman V; Swaminathan M; Wong YL; Armitage JA; Gentle A; Backhouse S J Clin Med; 2021 Mar; 10(6):. PubMed ID: 33804031 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of refractive value and pupil size under monocular and binocular conditions between the Spot Vision Screener and binocular open-field autorefractor. Satou T; Takahashi Y; Niida T Strabismus; 2020 Dec; 28(4):186-193. PubMed ID: 33063575 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of photorefraction by Plusoptix A12 and cycloplegic autorefraction in children. Ghadimi H; Nikdel M; Suh DW BMC Ophthalmol; 2024 Apr; 24(1):179. PubMed ID: 38641836 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Aberrometry Repeatability and Agreement with Autorefraction. Nguyen MT; Berntsen DA Optom Vis Sci; 2017 Sep; 94(9):886-893. PubMed ID: 28727613 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of open-field autorefraction, closed-field autorefraction, and retinoscopy for refractive measurements of children and adolescents in Taiwan. Kuo YC; Wang JH; Chiu CJ J Formos Med Assoc; 2020 Aug; 119(8):1251-1258. PubMed ID: 32354691 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of spherical equivalent refraction and astigmatism measured with three different models of autorefractors. Gwiazda J; Weber C Optom Vis Sci; 2004 Jan; 81(1):56-61. PubMed ID: 14747762 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Central and peripheral autorefraction repeatability in normal eyes. Moore KE; Berntsen DA Optom Vis Sci; 2014 Sep; 91(9):1106-12. PubMed ID: 25062133 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of autorefraction in an adult Indian population. Kumar RS; Moe CA; Kumar D; Rackenchath MV; A V SD; Nagaraj S; Wittberg DM; Stamper RL; Keenan JD PLoS One; 2021; 16(5):e0251583. PubMed ID: 34010350 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Non-cycloplegic screening for refractive errors in children with the hand-held autorefractor Retinomax: final results and comparison with non-cycloplegic photoscreening. Cordonnier M; Kallay O Strabismus; 2001 Jun; 9(2):59-70. PubMed ID: 11458294 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of autorefraction and subjective refraction with and without cycloplegia in primary school children. Choong YF; Chen AH; Goh PP Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Jul; 142(1):68-74. PubMed ID: 16815252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison between two hand-held autorefractors: the Sure-Sight and the Retinomax. Cordonnier M; De Maertelaer V Strabismus; 2004 Dec; 12(4):261-74. PubMed ID: 15545144 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of PlusOptix A09 distance refraction in pediatric myopia and hyperopia. Payerols A; Eliaou C; Trezeguet V; Villain M; Daien V BMC Ophthalmol; 2016 Jun; 16():72. PubMed ID: 27246869 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Two different autorefractors for vision screening in children and adolescents. Chen XJ; Liu LJ; Sun B; Jiang DD; Zuo SS; Wang YH; Zhang CH; Chen YY Int J Ophthalmol; 2024; 17(2):331-338. PubMed ID: 38371256 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Performance of Spot Photoscreener in Detecting Amblyopia Risk Factors in Chinese Pre-school and School Age Children Attending an Eye Clinic. Mu Y; Bi H; Ekure E; Ding G; Wei N; Hua N; Qian X; Li X PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0149561. PubMed ID: 26882106 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]