These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33078119)

  • 21. Cycloplegic autorefraction versus subjective refraction: the Tehran Eye Study.
    Hashemi H; Khabazkhoob M; Asharlous A; Soroush S; Yekta A; Dadbin N; Fotouhi A
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2016 Aug; 100(8):1122-7. PubMed ID: 26541436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Prevalence of myopia among urban and suburban school children in Tamil Nadu, South India: findings from the Sankara Nethralaya Tamil Nadu Essilor Myopia (STEM) Study.
    Gopalakrishnan A; Hussaindeen JR; Sivaraman V; Swaminathan M; Wong YL; Armitage JA; Gentle A; Backhouse S
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2022 Mar; 42(2):345-357. PubMed ID: 35019150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Achieving Optimal Correction for Young Myopic Children: A Concept Study.
    Rasmussen SB; Møller F; Jakobsen TM
    Biomed Hub; 2022; 7(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 35223874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Screening for significant refractive error using a combination of distance visual acuity and near visual acuity.
    Jin P; Zhu J; Zou H; Lu L; Zhao H; Li Q; He X
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(2):e0117399. PubMed ID: 25689600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Clinical evaluation of the Grand Seiko Auto Ref/Keratometer WAM-5500.
    Sheppard AL; Davies LN
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2010 Mar; 30(2):143-51. PubMed ID: 20444118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The difference between cycloplegic and non-cycloplegic autorefraction and its association with progression of refractive error in Beijing urban children.
    Lin Z; Vasudevan B; Ciuffreda KJ; Zhou HJ; Mao GY; Wang NL; Liang YB
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2017 Jul; 37(4):489-497. PubMed ID: 28503812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A comparison of cycloplegic autorefraction and retinoscopy in Indian children.
    Guha S; Shah S; Shah K; Hurakadli P; Majee D; Gandhi S
    Clin Exp Optom; 2017 Jan; 100(1):73-78. PubMed ID: 27426488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A comparison of autorefractor performance.
    Pesudovs K; Weisinger HS
    Optom Vis Sci; 2004 Jul; 81(7):554-8. PubMed ID: 15252356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [The performance of visual photoscreening for Chinese preschool children aged 4 to 5 years].
    Li R; Huang D; Zhu H; Sun QG; Wang Y; Zhang XH; Zhao XY; He J; Liu L; Zhou JJ; Liu H
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Mar; 56(3):189-196. PubMed ID: 32187947
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Assessment of multifocal contact lens over-refraction using an infrared, open-field autorefractor: A preliminary study.
    Giner A; Aldaba M; Arjona M; Vilaseca M; Pujol J
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2015 Oct; 38(5):322-6. PubMed ID: 25907202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Screening for refractive errors in children: the plusoptiX S08 and the Retinomax K-plus2 performed by a lay screener compared to cycloplegic retinoscopy.
    Paff T; Oudesluys-Murphy AM; Wolterbeek R; Swart-van den Berg M; de Nie JM; Tijssen E; Schalij-Delfos NE
    J AAPOS; 2010 Dec; 14(6):478-83. PubMed ID: 21168070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Cycloplegic autorefraction results in pre-school children using the Nikon Retinomax Plus and the Welch Allyn SureSight.
    Steele G; Ireland D; Block S
    Optom Vis Sci; 2003 Aug; 80(8):573-7. PubMed ID: 12917576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of Plusoptix S12R photoscreener with cycloplegic retinoscopy and autorefraction in pediatric age group.
    Saini V; Raina UK; Gupta A; Goyal JL; Anjum R; Saini P; Gupta SK; Sharma P
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2019 Oct; 67(10):1555-1559. PubMed ID: 31546479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Repeatability of autorefraction and axial length measurements after laser in situ keratomileusis.
    Bailey MD; Twa MD; Mitchell GL; Dhaliwal DK; Jones LA; McMahon TT
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 May; 31(5):1025-34. PubMed ID: 15975474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Using Decision Curve Analysis to Evaluate Common Strategies for Myopia Screening in School-Aged Children.
    Lin S; Ma Y; He X; Zhu J; Zou H
    Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2019 Aug; 26(4):286-294. PubMed ID: 31094286
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The optimal cut-off value of non-cycloplegic autorefraction for diagnosing myopia in school-aged children.
    Senoo Y; Furuse T; Hasebe S
    Jpn J Ophthalmol; 2022 Sep; 66(5):455-460. PubMed ID: 35788446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A comparison of different autorefractors with retinoscopy in children.
    Oral Y; Gunaydin N; Ozgur O; Arsan AK; Oskan S
    J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2012; 49(6):370-7. PubMed ID: 22938517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Refractive error and visual impairment in school-age children in Gombak District, Malaysia.
    Goh PP; Abqariyah Y; Pokharel GP; Ellwein LB
    Ophthalmology; 2005 Apr; 112(4):678-85. PubMed ID: 15808262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Auto-objective accommodative measurements as a valid and reliable new method of pediatric, strabismus and amblyopia, vision screening.
    Matta NS; Singman EL; Brubaker C; Silbert DI
    Binocul Vis Strabolog Q Simms Romano; 2011; 26(3):140-5. PubMed ID: 21992058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Validation of the PowerRef 3 for Measuring Accommodation: Comparison With the Grand Seiko WAM-5500A Autorefractor.
    Gehring AM; Haensel JX; Curtiss MK; Roberts TL
    Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2022 Oct; 11(10):25. PubMed ID: 36255360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.