These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33078419)

  • 1. Estimating the ligand-binding affinity via λ-dependent umbrella sampling simulations.
    Ngo ST
    J Comput Chem; 2021 Jan; 42(2):117-123. PubMed ID: 33078419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prediction of AChE-ligand affinity using the umbrella sampling simulation.
    Lan NT; Vu KB; Dao Ngoc MK; Tran PT; Hiep DM; Tung NT; Ngo ST
    J Mol Graph Model; 2019 Dec; 93():107441. PubMed ID: 31479951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Oversampling Free Energy Perturbation Simulation in Determination of the Ligand-Binding Free Energy.
    Ngo ST; Nguyen TH; Tung NT; Nam PC; Vu KB; Vu VV
    J Comput Chem; 2020 Mar; 41(7):611-618. PubMed ID: 31840845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Absolute and relative binding free energy calculations of the interaction of biotin and its analogs with streptavidin using molecular dynamics/free energy perturbation approaches.
    Miyamoto S; Kollman PA
    Proteins; 1993 Jul; 16(3):226-45. PubMed ID: 8346190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Unbinding ligands from SARS-CoV-2 Mpro via umbrella sampling simulations.
    Tam NM; Nguyen TH; Ngan VT; Tung NT; Ngo ST
    R Soc Open Sci; 2022 Jan; 9(1):211480. PubMed ID: 35116157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effective Estimation of Ligand-Binding Affinity Using Biased Sampling Method.
    Ngo ST; Vu KB; Bui LM; Vu VV
    ACS Omega; 2019 Feb; 4(2):3887-3893. PubMed ID: 31459599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7.
    Wu P; Hu X; Yang W
    J Phys Chem Lett; 2011 Sep; 2(17):2099-2103. PubMed ID: 23678385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Multi-Site λ-dynamics for simulated Structure-Activity Relationship studies.
    Knight JL; Brooks CL
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2011 Sep; 7(9):2728-2739. PubMed ID: 22125476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Free energy calculations for the relative binding affinity between DNA and lambda-repressor.
    Saito M; Sarai A
    Proteins; 2003 Aug; 52(2):129-36. PubMed ID: 12833537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Efficient calculation of relative binding free energies by umbrella sampling perturbation.
    Zeller F; Zacharias M
    J Comput Chem; 2014 Dec; 35(31):2256-62. PubMed ID: 25266275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Improving the LIE Method for Binding Free Energy Calculations of Protein-Ligand Complexes.
    Miranda WE; Noskov SY; Valiente PA
    J Chem Inf Model; 2015 Sep; 55(9):1867-77. PubMed ID: 26180998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effective estimation of the inhibitor affinity of HIV-1 protease
    Ngo ST; Hong ND; Quynh Anh LH; Hiep DM; Tung NT
    RSC Adv; 2020 Feb; 10(13):7732-7739. PubMed ID: 35492181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Local Elevation Umbrella Sampling Applied to the Calculation of Alchemical Free-Energy Changes via λ-Dynamics: The λ-LEUS Scheme.
    Bieler NS; Häuselmann R; Hünenberger PH
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2014 Aug; 10(8):3006-22. PubMed ID: 26588272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Communication: estimating the initial biasing potential for λ-local-elevation umbrella-sampling (λ-LEUS) simulations via slow growth.
    Bieler NS; Hünenberger PH
    J Chem Phys; 2014 Nov; 141(20):201101. PubMed ID: 25429926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prediction of ligand binding affinity and orientation of xenoestrogens to the estrogen receptor by molecular dynamics simulations and the linear interaction energy method.
    van Lipzig MM; ter Laak AM; Jongejan A; Vermeulen NP; Wamelink M; Geerke D; Meerman JH
    J Med Chem; 2004 Feb; 47(4):1018-30. PubMed ID: 14761204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of the umbrella sampling and the double decoupling method in binding free energy predictions for SAMPL6 octa-acid host-guest challenges.
    Nishikawa N; Han K; Wu X; Tofoleanu F; Brooks BR
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Oct; 32(10):1075-1086. PubMed ID: 30324304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Detailed potential of mean force studies on host-guest systems from the SAMPL6 challenge.
    Song LF; Bansal N; Zheng Z; Merz KM
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Oct; 32(10):1013-1026. PubMed ID: 30143917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Theoretical study of the ligand-CYP2B4 complexes: effect of structure on binding free energies and heme spin state.
    Harris DL; Park JY; Gruenke L; Waskell L
    Proteins; 2004 Jun; 55(4):895-914. PubMed ID: 15146488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Improved estimation of protein-ligand binding free energy by using the ligand-entropy and mobility of water molecules.
    Fukunishi Y; Nakamura H
    Pharmaceuticals (Basel); 2013 Apr; 6(5):604-22. PubMed ID: 24276169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Alchemical Free-Energy Calculations by Multiple-Replica λ-Dynamics: The Conveyor Belt Thermodynamic Integration Scheme.
    Hahn DF; Hünenberger PH
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2019 Apr; 15(4):2392-2419. PubMed ID: 30821973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.