These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33078586)

  • 21. Neural synchrony during response production and inhibition.
    Müller V; Anokhin AP
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(6):e38931. PubMed ID: 22745691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The dorsal medial frontal cortex mediates automatic motor inhibition in uncertain contexts: evidence from combined fMRI and EEG studies.
    Albares M; Lio G; Criaud M; Anton JL; Desmurget M; Boulinguez P
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2014 Nov; 35(11):5517-31. PubMed ID: 24954611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Sentential Negation Might Share Neurophysiological Mechanisms with Action Inhibition. Evidence from Frontal Theta Rhythm.
    de Vega M; Morera Y; León I; Beltrán D; Casado P; Martín-Loeches M
    J Neurosci; 2016 Jun; 36(22):6002-10. PubMed ID: 27251621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The Effects of Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment on Go/NoGo Semantic Categorization Task Performance and Event-Related Potentials.
    Mudar RA; Chiang HS; Eroh J; Nguyen LT; Maguire MJ; Spence JS; Kung F; Kraut MA; Hart J
    J Alzheimers Dis; 2016; 50(2):577-90. PubMed ID: 26836634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Machine learning provides novel neurophysiological features that predict performance to inhibit automated responses.
    Vahid A; Mückschel M; Neuhaus A; Stock AK; Beste C
    Sci Rep; 2018 Nov; 8(1):16235. PubMed ID: 30390016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Prestimulus alpha and beta contributions to equiprobable Go/NoGo processing in healthy ageing.
    De Blasio FM; Barry RJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2020 Sep; 155():32-40. PubMed ID: 32479772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Frontal theta and alpha power and coherence changes are modulated by semantic complexity in Go/NoGo tasks.
    Brier MR; Ferree TC; Maguire MJ; Moore P; Spence J; Tillman GD; Hart J; Kraut MA
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2010 Dec; 78(3):215-24. PubMed ID: 20696190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Somato-motor inhibitory processing in humans: a study with MEG and ERP.
    Nakata H; Inui K; Wasaka T; Akatsuka K; Kakigi R
    Eur J Neurosci; 2005 Oct; 22(7):1784-92. PubMed ID: 16197519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Neural correlates of a Go/NoGo task with alcohol stimuli in light and heavy young drinkers.
    Ames SL; Wong SW; Bechara A; Cappelli C; Dust M; Grenard JL; Stacy AW
    Behav Brain Res; 2014 Nov; 274():382-9. PubMed ID: 25172182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Sex differences in equiprobable auditory Go/NoGo task: effects on N2 and P3.
    Melynyte S; Ruksenas O; Griskova-Bulanova I
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 May; 235(5):1565-1574. PubMed ID: 28258436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The neural basis of improved cognitive performance by threat of shock.
    Torrisi S; Robinson O; O'Connell K; Davis A; Balderston N; Ernst M; Grillon C
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2016 Nov; 11(11):1677-1686. PubMed ID: 27369069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Prestimulus alpha and beta determinants of ERP responses in the Go/NoGo task.
    De Blasio FM; Barry RJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Jul; 89(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 23643562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Prestimulus EEG amplitude determinants of ERP responses in a habituation paradigm.
    De Blasio FM; Barry RJ; Steiner GZ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Sep; 89(3):444-50. PubMed ID: 23732790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Executive control in obsessive-compulsive disorder: event-related potentials in a Go/Nogo task.
    Ruchsow M; Reuter K; Hermle L; Ebert D; Kiefer M; Falkenstein M
    J Neural Transm (Vienna); 2007; 114(12):1595-601. PubMed ID: 17610122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Sequential processing in an auditory equiprobable Go/NoGo task with variable interstimulus interval.
    Borchard JP; Barry RJ; De Blasio FM
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2015 Aug; 97(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 26024616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Short-term training in the Go/Nogo task: behavioural and neural changes depend on task demands.
    Benikos N; Johnstone SJ; Roodenrys SJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Mar; 87(3):301-12. PubMed ID: 23247193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Preferred EEG brain states at stimulus onset in a fixed interstimulus interval equiprobable auditory Go/NoGo task: a definitive study.
    Barry RJ; De Blasio FM; De Pascalis V; Karamacoska D
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2014 Oct; 94(1):42-58. PubMed ID: 25043955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evoked activity and EEG phase resetting in the genesis of auditory Go/NoGo ERPs.
    Barry RJ
    Biol Psychol; 2009 Mar; 80(3):292-9. PubMed ID: 19028546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Efficiency of go/no-go task performance implemented in the left hemisphere.
    Hirose S; Chikazoe J; Watanabe T; Jimura K; Kunimatsu A; Abe O; Ohtomo K; Miyashita Y; Konishi S
    J Neurosci; 2012 Jun; 32(26):9059-65. PubMed ID: 22745505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparative analysis of event-related potentials during Go/NoGo and CPT: decomposition of electrophysiological markers of response inhibition and sustained attention.
    Kirmizi-Alsan E; Bayraktaroglu Z; Gurvit H; Keskin YH; Emre M; Demiralp T
    Brain Res; 2006 Aug; 1104(1):114-28. PubMed ID: 16824492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.