These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33079275)

  • 1. [Pifalls in the interpretation of pacemaker ECGs].
    Israel CW; Tribunyan S; Kalyani M
    Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol; 2020 Dec; 31(4):345-361. PubMed ID: 33079275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Analysis of pacemaker ECGs].
    Israel CW; Ekosso-Ejangue L; Sheta MK
    Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol; 2015 Sep; 26(3):260-73. PubMed ID: 26272440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Interpreting the Normal Pacemaker Electrocardiograph.
    Mond HG
    Heart Lung Circ; 2019 Feb; 28(2):223-236. PubMed ID: 30056014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A software-based pacemaker pulse detection and paced rhythm classification algorithm.
    Helfenbein ED; Lindauer JM; Zhou SH; Gregg RE; Herleikson EC
    J Electrocardiol; 2002; 35 Suppl():95-103. PubMed ID: 12539105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A stochastic network model of the interaction between cardiac rhythm and artificial pacemaker.
    Greenhut SE; Jenkins JM; MacDonald RS
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1993 Sep; 40(9):845-58. PubMed ID: 8288275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Common pitfalls in interpreting pacemaker electrocardiograms in the emergency department.
    Venkatachalam KL
    J Electrocardiol; 2011; 44(6):616-21. PubMed ID: 21907995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Esophageal ECG recording--a valuable diagnostic tool in dual chamber pacing.
    Brandt J; Pahlm O; Schüller H
    Eur Heart J; 1985 Apr; 6(4):342-8. PubMed ID: 4029189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A novel ECG-based algorithm to determine right ventricular lead placement in permanent pacemaker patients (RVpace study).
    Zajac D; Farkowski MM; Kowalik I; Jankowska A; Firek B; Szwed H; Pytkowski M
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2019 Oct; 30(10):2034-2040. PubMed ID: 31402513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A systematic approach to pacemaker assessment.
    Reynolds J; Apple S
    AACN Clin Issues; 2001 Feb; 12(1):114-26. PubMed ID: 11288321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Development and validation of a novel algorithm based on the ECG magnet response for rapid identification of any unknown pacemaker.
    Squara F; Chik WW; Benhayon D; Maeda S; Latcu DG; Lacaze-Gadonneix J; Tibi T; Thomas O; Cooper JM; Duthoit G
    Heart Rhythm; 2014 Aug; 11(8):1367-76. PubMed ID: 24727582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Holter recordings with continuous marker annotations: a new tool in pacemaker diagnostics.
    Nowak B; Middeldorf T; Housworth CM; Brüls A; Liebrich A; Rosocha S; Voigtländer T; Himmrich E; Meyer J
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1996 Nov; 19(11 Pt 2):1791-5. PubMed ID: 8945042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of hyperkalaemia on cardiac rhythm devices.
    Barold SS; Herweg B
    Europace; 2014 Apr; 16(4):467-76. PubMed ID: 24465006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pacemaker diagnostic diagrams.
    Olson WH; McConnell MV; Sah RL; Beck RC; Sutton R
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1985 Sep; 8(5):691-700. PubMed ID: 2414751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Computerized interpretation of the paced ECG.
    Greenhut SE; Jenkins JM; DiCarlo LA
    J Electrocardiol; 1992; 24 Suppl():146-52. PubMed ID: 1552248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Electrocardiographic follow-up of biventricular pacemakers.
    Barold SS; Herweg B; Giudici M
    Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol; 2005 Apr; 10(2):231-55. PubMed ID: 15842437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. His bundle pacing: troubleshooting during follow-up.
    Israel CW; Tribunyan S
    Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol; 2020 Jun; 31(2):183-209. PubMed ID: 32468138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Applications of adaptive filtering to ECG analysis: noise cancellation and arrhythmia detection.
    Thakor NV; Zhu YS
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1991 Aug; 38(8):785-94. PubMed ID: 1937512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Compressive Sampling Based Multi-Spectrum Deep Learning for Sub-Nyquist Pacemaker ECG Analysis.
    Hao C; Wibowo S; Rajput KS
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2020 Jul; 2020():357-360. PubMed ID: 33018002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An innovative hybrid approach for detection of pacemaker pulses at low sampling frequency.
    Nallathambi G; Selvaraj N; Rajbhandary PL
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2020 Jul; 2020():5012-5015. PubMed ID: 33019112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Arrhythmia resulting from sensing malfunction in a P wave triggered pacemaker.
    Curtis GP; Lief LH
    J Electrocardiol; 1980 Oct; 13(4):401-4. PubMed ID: 7430871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.