217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33079593)
1. An updated cost-effectiveness analysis of pazopanib versus sunitinib as first-line treatment for locally advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma in Italy.
Capri S; Porta C; Condorelli C; Premoli E; Khare A; Kalra M; Modi N; Ratto B
J Med Econ; 2020 Dec; 23(12):1579-1587. PubMed ID: 33079593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cost-effectiveness of Pazopanib Versus Sunitinib as First-line Treatment for Locally Advanced or Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma from an Italian National Health Service Perspective.
Capri S; Porta C; Delea TE
Clin Ther; 2017 Mar; 39(3):567-580.e2. PubMed ID: 28189363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cost-effectiveness of pazopanib versus sunitinib for renal cancer in the United States.
Delea TE; Amdahl J; Diaz J; Nakhaipour HR; Hackshaw MD
J Manag Care Spec Pharm; 2015 Jan; 21(1):46-54, 54a-b. PubMed ID: 25562772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cost-effectiveness of pazopanib versus sunitinib for metastatic renal cell carcinoma in the United Kingdom.
Amdahl J; Diaz J; Sharma A; Park J; Chandiwana D; Delea TE
PLoS One; 2017; 12(6):e0175920. PubMed ID: 28636648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Economic evaluation of sunitinib versus pazopanib and best supportive care for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma in Chile: cost-effectiveness analysis and a mixed treatment comparison.
Vargas C; Balmaceda C; Rodríguez F; Rojas R; Giglio A; Espinoza MA
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2019 Oct; 19(5):609-617. PubMed ID: 30758237
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Cost-utility of Sunitinib Versus Pazopanib in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma in Canada using Real-world Evidence.
Nazha S; Tanguay S; Kapoor A; Jewett M; Kollmannsberger C; Wood L; Bjarnason GAG; Heng D; Soulières D; Reaume MN; Basappa N; Lévesque E; Dragomir A
Clin Drug Investig; 2018 Dec; 38(12):1155-1165. PubMed ID: 30267257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pazopanib for the first-line treatment of patients with advanced and/or metastatic renal cell carcinoma : a NICE single technology appraisal.
Kilonzo M; Hislop J; Elders A; Fraser C; Bissett D; McClinton S; Mowatt G; Vale L
Pharmacoeconomics; 2013 Jan; 31(1):15-24. PubMed ID: 23329590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab with axitinib as first-line treatment for advanced renal cell carcinoma.
Bensimon AG; Zhong Y; Swami U; Briggs A; Young J; Feng Y; Song Y; Signorovitch J; Adejoro O; Chakravarty A; Chen M; Perini RF; Geynisman DM
Curr Med Res Opin; 2020 Sep; 36(9):1507-1517. PubMed ID: 32697113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cost-Effectiveness of the First Line Treatment Options For Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma in India.
Gupta D; Singh A; Gupta N; Mehra N; Bahuguna P; Aggarwal V; Krishnamurthy MN; Roy PS; Malhotra P; Gupta S; Kumar L; Kataki A; Prinja S
JCO Glob Oncol; 2023 Feb; 9():e2200246. PubMed ID: 36795991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Nivolumab and Ipilimumab Versus Sunitinib in First-Line Intermediate- to Poor-Risk Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Reinhorn D; Sarfaty M; Leshno M; Moore A; Neiman V; Rosenbaum E; Goldstein DA
Oncologist; 2019 Mar; 24(3):366-371. PubMed ID: 30710066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cost-Effectiveness of Pembrolizumab plus Axitinib Versus Sunitinib as First-Line Therapy in Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma in the U.S.
Ding D; Hu H; Shi Y; She L; Yao L; Zhu Y; Zeng S; Shen L; Huang J
Oncologist; 2021 Feb; 26(2):e290-e297. PubMed ID: 32918790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cost-effectiveness of pazopanib compared with sunitinib in metastatic renal cell carcinoma in Canada.
Amdahl J; Diaz J; Park J; Nakhaipour HR; Delea TE
Curr Oncol; 2016 Aug; 23(4):e340-54. PubMed ID: 27536183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Economic evaluation of sunitinib malate for the first-line treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma.
Remák E; Charbonneau C; Négrier S; Kim ST; Motzer RJ
J Clin Oncol; 2008 Aug; 26(24):3995-4000. PubMed ID: 18711190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cost-effectiveness evaluation of sunitinib as first-line targeted therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma in Spain.
Calvo Aller E; Maroto P; Kreif N; González Larriba JL; López-Brea M; Castellano D; Martí B; Díaz Cerezo S
Clin Transl Oncol; 2011 Dec; 13(12):869-77. PubMed ID: 22126730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. First-line Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab vs Sunitinib for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Cost-effectiveness Analysis.
Wan X; Zhang Y; Tan C; Zeng X; Peng L
JAMA Oncol; 2019 Apr; 5(4):491-496. PubMed ID: 30789633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cost-Effectiveness and Net Monetary Benefit of Olaparib Maintenance Therapy Versus No Maintenance Therapy After First-line Platinum-based Chemotherapy in Newly Diagnosed Advanced BRCA1/2-mutated Ovarian Cancer in the Italian National Health Service.
Armeni P; Borsoi L; Fornaro G; Jommi C; Colombo N; Costa F
Clin Ther; 2020 Jul; 42(7):1192-1209.e12. PubMed ID: 32591103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Real-life data on first-line Sunitinib and Pazopanib therapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients: a single center experience.
Topal A; Sayın S; Gokyer A; Kucukarda A; Kostek O; Bekir Hacıoglu M; Uzunoglu S; Erdogan B; Cicin I
J BUON; 2021; 26(4):1628-1634. PubMed ID: 34565028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Health care costs among renal cancer patients using pazopanib and sunitinib.
Hansen RN; Hackshaw MD; Nagar SP; Arondekar B; Deen KC; Sullivan SD; Ramsey SD
J Manag Care Spec Pharm; 2015 Jan; 21(1):37-44, 44a-d. PubMed ID: 25562771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pazopanib has equivalent anti-tumor effectiveness and lower Total costs than Sunitinib for treating metastatic or advanced renal cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis.
Deng H; Huang Y; Hong Z; Yuan X; Cao Z; Wei Y; Zhang W
BMC Cancer; 2019 May; 19(1):489. PubMed ID: 31122210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Potential health gains for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma in daily clinical practice: A real-world cost-effectiveness analysis of sequential first- and second-line treatments.
De Groot S; Blommestein HM; Redekop WK; Sleijfer S; Kiemeney LALM; Oosterwijk E; Uyl-de Groot CA
PLoS One; 2017; 12(5):e0177364. PubMed ID: 28531203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
