218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33079593)
21. Real-World Treatment Patterns and Costs for Patients with Renal Cell Carcinoma Initiating Treatment with Sunitinib and Pazopanib.
MacLean E; Mardekian J; Cisar LA; Hoang CJ; Harnett J
J Manag Care Spec Pharm; 2016 Aug; 22(8):979-90. PubMed ID: 27459661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Cost-effectiveness of everolimus for second-line treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma in Serbia.
Mihajlović J; Pechlivanoglou P; Sabo A; Tomić Z; Postma MJ
Clin Ther; 2013 Dec; 35(12):1909-22. PubMed ID: 24238790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Economic evaluation of sunitinib malate in second-line treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma in Finland.
Purmonen T; Martikainen JA; Soini EJ; Kataja V; Vuorinen RL; Kellokumpu-Lehtinen PL
Clin Ther; 2008 Feb; 30(2):382-92. PubMed ID: 18343276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Sunitinib versus Interferon-Alfa for First-Line Treatment of Advanced and/or Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma in Singapore.
Pruis SL; Aziz MIA; Pearce F; Tan MH; Wu DB; Ng K
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2019 Jan; 35(2):126-133. PubMed ID: 30854989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Budget impact analysis of first-line treatment with pazopanib for advanced renal cell carcinoma in Spain.
Villa G; Hernández-Pastor LJ
BMC Cancer; 2013 Sep; 13():399. PubMed ID: 24004638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Cost-effectiveness and Net Monetary Benefit of Durvalumab Consolidation Therapy Versus No Consolidation Therapy After Chemoradiotherapy in Stage III Non-small Cell Lung Cancer in the Italian National Health Service.
Armeni P; Borsoi L; Fornaro G; Jommi C; Grossi F; Costa F
Clin Ther; 2020 May; 42(5):830-847. PubMed ID: 32354495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Economic evaluation of first-line nivolumab plus cabozantinib for advanced renal cell carcinoma in China.
Wang H; Wang Y; Li L; Zhou H; Lili S; Li L; Yike S; Aixia M
Front Public Health; 2022; 10():954264. PubMed ID: 36159269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Pembrolizumab as an Adjuvant Treatment of Renal Cell Carcinoma Post-nephrectomy in the United States.
Lai Y; Bensimon AG; Gao E; Bhattacharya R; Xu R; Chevure J; Imai K; Haas NB
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2023 Oct; 21(5):612.e1-612.e11. PubMed ID: 37137809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Economic evaluation of everolimus versus sorafenib for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma after failure of first-line sunitinib.
Casciano R; Chulikavit M; Di Lorenzo G; Liu Z; Baladi JF; Wang X; Robertson J; Garrison L
Value Health; 2011; 14(6):846-51. PubMed ID: 21914504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Cost-effectiveness of Pembrolizumab Plus Axitinib Vs Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab as First-Line Treatment of Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma in the US.
Watson TR; Gao X; Reynolds KL; Kong CY
JAMA Netw Open; 2020 Oct; 3(10):e2016144. PubMed ID: 33052401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of First-Line Nivolumab Plus Cabozantinib for Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma in the United States.
Liao W; Lei W; Feng M; Yang Y; Wu Q; Zhou K; Bai L; Wen F; Li Q
Adv Ther; 2021 Dec; 38(12):5662-5670. PubMed ID: 34664194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Pazopanib versus sunitinib in Chinese patients with locally advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma: pooled subgroup analysis from the randomized, COMPARZ studies.
Sheng X; Jin J; He Z; Huang Y; Zhou A; Wang J; Ren X; Ye D; Zhang X; Qin S; Zhou F; Wang B; Guo J
BMC Cancer; 2020 Mar; 20(1):219. PubMed ID: 32171288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Cost-Effectiveness of Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab for the First-Line Treatment of Intermediate/Poor-Risk Advanced and/or Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma in Switzerland.
Çakar E; Oniangue-Ndza C; Schneider RP; Klijn SL; Vogl UM; Rothermundt C; May JR
Pharmacoecon Open; 2023 Jul; 7(4):567-577. PubMed ID: 36757568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. First-Line Lenvatinib Plus Pembrolizumab or Everolimus versus Sunitinib for Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma: A United States-Based Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.
Zhu Y; Liu K; Ding D; Peng L
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2023 Jun; 21(3):417.e1-417.e10. PubMed ID: 36529626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Six Immunotherapy-Based Regimens and Sunitinib in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Public Payer Perspective.
Yoo M; Nelson RE; Cutshall Z; Dougherty M; Kohli M
JCO Oncol Pract; 2023 Mar; 19(3):e449-e456. PubMed ID: 36599117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Commentary on: "Randomized, controlled, double-blind, cross-over trial assessing treatment preference for pazopanib versus sunitinib in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: PISCES study." Escudier B, Porta C, Bono P, Powles T, Eisen T, Sternberg CN, Gschwend JE, De Giorgi U, Parikh O, Hawkins R, Sevin E, Négrier S, Khan S, Diaz J, Redhu S, Mehmud F, Cella D. Bernard Escudier, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif; Emmanuel Sevin, Centre François Baclesse, Caen; Sylvie Négrier, Leon Berard Cancer Center, Lyon, France; Camillo Porta, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Policlinico S. Matteo, Pavia; Cora N Sternberg, San Camillo Forlanini Hospital, Rome; Ugo De Giorgi, IRCCS Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori, Meldola, Italy; Petri Bono, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland; Thomas Powles, Barts Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London; Tim Eisen, Cambridge University Health Partners, Cambridge; Omi Parikh, Royal Preston Hospital, Lancashire; Robert Hawkins, Christie Cancer Research UK, Manchester; Sadya Khan, Jose Diaz, and Faisal Mehmud, GlaxoSmithKline, Uxbridge, United Kingdom; Jürgen E Gschwend, Klinikum Rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München, Munich, Germany; Suman Redhu, GlaxoSmithKline, Collegeville, PA; David Cella, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL.: J Clin Oncol. 2014 May 10;32(14):1412-1418; doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.50.8267. [Epub 2014 Mar 31].
Trump D
Urol Oncol; 2016 May; 34(5):251. PubMed ID: 25937427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Persistence and compliance among U.S. patients receiving pazopanib or sunitinib as first-line therapy for advanced renal cell carcinoma: a retrospective claims analysis.
Byfield SA; McPheeters JT; Burton TM; Nagar SP; Hackshaw MD
J Manag Care Spec Pharm; 2015 Jun; 21(6):515-22. PubMed ID: 26011553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Cost-effectiveness analysis of nivolumab plus cabozantinib versus sunitinib as first-line therapy in advanced renal cell carcinoma.
Liu R; Qiu K; Wu J; Jiang Y; Wu P; Pang J
Immunotherapy; 2022 Aug; 14(11):859-869. PubMed ID: 35754404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Quality-adjusted time without symptoms or toxicity analysis of pazopanib versus sunitinib in patients with renal cell carcinoma.
Beaumont JL; Salsman JM; Diaz J; Deen KC; McCann L; Powles T; Hackshaw MD; Motzer RJ; Cella D
Cancer; 2016 Apr; 122(7):1108-15. PubMed ID: 27000445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Cost-effectiveness analysis of anlotinib versus sunitinib as first-line treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma in China.
Lin J; Fang Q; Zheng X
PLoS One; 2023; 18(2):e0281402. PubMed ID: 36749752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
