187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3307992)
1. Fascia closure after midline laparotomy: results of a randomized trial.
Wissing J; van Vroonhoven TJ; Schattenkerk ME; Veen HF; Ponsen RJ; Jeekel J
Br J Surg; 1987 Aug; 74(8):738-41. PubMed ID: 3307992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Closure of midline laparotomy incisions with polydioxanone and nylon: the importance of suture technique.
Israelsson LA; Jonsson T
Br J Surg; 1994 Nov; 81(11):1606-8. PubMed ID: 7827883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A randomized clinical trial comparing two methods of fascia closure following midline laparotomy.
Trimbos JB; Smit IB; Holm JP; Hermans J
Arch Surg; 1992 Oct; 127(10):1232-4. PubMed ID: 1417492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Incisional hernia after laparotomy: prospective randomized comparison between early-absorbable and late-absorbable suture materials.
Hsiao WC; Young KC; Wang ST; Lin PW
World J Surg; 2000 Jun; 24(6):747-51; discussion 752. PubMed ID: 10773130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Results of a controlled trial comparing 3 suture threads at slow resorption for the closure of supra-umbilical midline laparotomies].
Bresler L; Courbey PJ; Feldman L; Bilweiss J; Tortuyaux JM; Rauch P; Boissel P; Grosdidier J
Ann Chir; 1995; 49(6):544-8. PubMed ID: 8526449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Closure methods for laparotomy incisions for preventing incisional hernias and other wound complications.
Patel SV; Paskar DD; Nelson RL; Vedula SS; Steele SR
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Nov; 11(11):CD005661. PubMed ID: 29099149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Abdominal fascia closure following elective midline laparotomy: a surgical experience at a tertiary care hospital in Tanzania.
Chalya PL; Massinde AN; Kihunrwa A; Mabula JB
BMC Res Notes; 2015 Jun; 8():281. PubMed ID: 26121978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Interrupted or continuous slowly absorbable sutures for closure of primary elective midline abdominal incisions: a multicenter randomized trial (INSECT: ISRCTN24023541).
Seiler CM; Bruckner T; Diener MK; Papyan A; Golcher H; Seidlmayer C; Franck A; Kieser M; Büchler MW; Knaebel HP
Ann Surg; 2009 Apr; 249(4):576-82. PubMed ID: 19300233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Layer closure of laparotomy wounds with absorbable and non-absorbable suture materials.
Irvin TT; Koffman CG; Duthie HL
Br J Surg; 1976 Oct; 63(10):793-6. PubMed ID: 791437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Monofilament versus multifilament absorbable sutures for abdominal closure.
Sahlin S; Ahlberg J; Granström L; Ljungström KG
Br J Surg; 1993 Mar; 80(3):322-4. PubMed ID: 8472140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of upper abdominal wound closure with monofilament nylon and polyglycolic acid.
Askew AR
Aust N Z J Surg; 1983 Aug; 53(4):353-6. PubMed ID: 6311152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Polydioxanone or polypropylene for closure of midline abdominal incisions: a prospective comparative clinical trial.
Krukowski ZH; Cusick EL; Engeset J; Matheson NA
Br J Surg; 1987 Sep; 74(9):828-30. PubMed ID: 3117165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Burst abdomen and incisional hernia after major gastrointestinal operations--comparison of three closure techniques.
Gislason H; Grønbech JE; Søreide O
Eur J Surg; 1995 May; 161(5):349-54. PubMed ID: 7662780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Meta-analysis of techniques for closure of midline abdominal incisions.
van 't Riet M; Steyerberg EW; Nellensteyn J; Bonjer HJ; Jeekel J
Br J Surg; 2002 Nov; 89(11):1350-6. PubMed ID: 12390373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Randomized clinical trial comparing polypropylene or polydioxanone for midline abdominal wall closure.
Bloemen A; van Dooren P; Huizinga BF; Hoofwijk AG
Br J Surg; 2011 May; 98(5):633-9. PubMed ID: 21254041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Abdominal wound closure. A randomized prospective study of 571 patients comparing continuous vs. interrupted suture techniques.
Richards PC; Balch CM; Aldrete JS
Ann Surg; 1983 Feb; 197(2):238-43. PubMed ID: 6297417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A controlled clinical trial of three methods of closure of laparotomy wounds.
Goligher JC; Irvin TT; Johnston D; De Dombal FT; Hill GL; Horrocks JC
Br J Surg; 1975 Oct; 62(10):823-9. PubMed ID: 1104042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Continuous absorbable vs interrupted nonabsorbable fascial closure. A prospective, randomized comparison.
McNeil PM; Sugerman HJ
Arch Surg; 1986 Jul; 121(7):821-3. PubMed ID: 3013123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mechanical factors influencing the incidence of burst abdomen.
Niggebrugge AH; Hansen BE; Trimbos JB; van de Velde CJ; Zwaveling A
Eur J Surg; 1995 Sep; 161(9):655-61. PubMed ID: 8541424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The search for an ideal method of abdominal fascial closure: a meta-analysis.
Hodgson NC; Malthaner RA; Ostbye T
Ann Surg; 2000 Mar; 231(3):436-42. PubMed ID: 10714638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
