These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33080145)

  • 1. Followup of Men with PI-RADS™ 4 or 5 Abnormality on Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Nonmalignant Pathological Findings on Initial Targeted Prostate Biopsy.
    Meng X; Chao B; Chen F; Huang R; Taneja SS; Deng FM
    J Urol; 2021 Mar; 205(3):748-754. PubMed ID: 33080145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. PI-RADS Version 2 Category on 3 Tesla Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging Predicts Oncologic Outcomes in Gleason 3 + 4 Prostate Cancer on Biopsy.
    Faiena I; Salmasi A; Mendhiratta N; Markovic D; Ahuja P; Hsu W; Elashoff DA; Raman SS; Reiter RE
    J Urol; 2019 Jan; 201(1):91-97. PubMed ID: 30142318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Is it Time to Perform Only Magnetic Resonance Imaging Targeted Cores? Our Experience with 1,032 Men Who Underwent Prostate Biopsy.
    Pepe P; Garufi A; Priolo GD; Galia A; Fraggetta F; Pennisi M
    J Urol; 2018 Oct; 200(4):774-778. PubMed ID: 29679618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Risk of Prostate Cancer after a Negative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Guided Biopsy.
    Kinnaird A; Sharma V; Chuang R; Priester A; Tran E; Barsa DE; Delfin M; Kwan L; Sisk A; Felker E; Marks LS
    J Urol; 2020 Dec; 204(6):1180-1186. PubMed ID: 32614257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Validation of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 for the Detection of Prostate Cancer.
    Hofbauer SL; Maxeiner A; Kittner B; Heckmann R; Reimann M; Wiemer L; Asbach P; Haas M; Penzkofer T; Stephan C; Friedersdorff F; Fuller F; Miller K; Cash H
    J Urol; 2018 Oct; 200(4):767-773. PubMed ID: 29733838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Institutional Learning Curve of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion Targeted Prostate Biopsy: Temporal Improvements in Cancer Detection in 4 Years.
    Meng X; Rosenkrantz AB; Huang R; Deng FM; Wysock JS; Bjurlin MA; Huang WC; Lepor H; Taneja SS
    J Urol; 2018 Nov; 200(5):1022-1029. PubMed ID: 29886090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative analysis of transperineal template saturation prostate biopsy versus magnetic resonance imaging targeted biopsy with magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion guidance.
    Radtke JP; Kuru TH; Boxler S; Alt CD; Popeneciu IV; Huettenbrink C; Klein T; Steinemann S; Bergstraesser C; Roethke M; Roth W; Schlemmer HP; Hohenfellner M; Hadaschik BA
    J Urol; 2015 Jan; 193(1):87-94. PubMed ID: 25079939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. PI-RADS Version 2 Category on 3 Tesla Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging Predicts Oncologic Outcomes in Gleason 3 + 4 Prostate Cancer on Biopsy.
    Faiena I; Salmasi A; Mendhiratta N; Markovic D; Ahuja P; Hsu W; Elashoff DA; Raman SS; Reiter RE
    J Urol; 2019 Jan; 201(1):91-97. PubMed ID: 30577397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Application of the PRECISION Trial Biopsy Strategy to a Contemporary Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Targeted Biopsy Cohort-How Many Clinically Significant Prostate Cancers are Missed?
    Feuer Z; Meng X; Rosenkrantz AB; Kasivisvanathan V; Moore CM; Huang R; Deng FM; Lepor H; Wysock JS; Huang WC; Taneja SS
    J Urol; 2021 Mar; 205(3):740-747. PubMed ID: 33026927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Targeted Biopsy in Patients with a Prior Negative Biopsy: A Consensus Statement by AUA and SAR.
    Rosenkrantz AB; Verma S; Choyke P; Eberhardt SC; Eggener SE; Gaitonde K; Haider MA; Margolis DJ; Marks LS; Pinto P; Sonn GA; Taneja SS
    J Urol; 2016 Dec; 196(6):1613-1618. PubMed ID: 27320841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prospective Evaluation of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 for Prostate Cancer Detection.
    Mertan FV; Greer MD; Shih JH; George AK; Kongnyuy M; Muthigi A; Merino MJ; Wood BJ; Pinto PA; Choyke PL; Turkbey B
    J Urol; 2016 Sep; 196(3):690-6. PubMed ID: 27101772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Anterior Localization of Prostate Cancer Suspicious Lesions in 1,161 Patients Undergoing Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion Guided Targeted Biopsies.
    Leyh-Bannurah SR; Kachanov M; Beyersdorff D; Preisser F; Tilki D; Fisch M; Graefen M; Budäus L
    J Urol; 2018 Nov; 200(5):1035-1040. PubMed ID: 29935274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Predicting Benign Prostate Pathology on Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy in Men with a Prior Negative 12-core Systematic Biopsy: External Validation of a Prognostic Nomogram.
    Bjurlin MA; Renson A; Rais-Bahrami S; Truong M; Rosenkrantz AB; Huang R; Taneja SS
    Eur Urol Focus; 2019 Sep; 5(5):815-822. PubMed ID: 29802053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Optimizing the Number of Cores Targeted During Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging Fusion Target Biopsy.
    Kenigsberg AP; Renson A; Rosenkrantz AB; Huang R; Wysock JS; Taneja SS; Bjurlin MA
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 Oct; 1(5):418-425. PubMed ID: 31158081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prospective Evaluation of PI-RADS™ Version 2 Using the International Society of Urological Pathology Prostate Cancer Grade Group System.
    Mehralivand S; Bednarova S; Shih JH; Mertan FV; Gaur S; Merino MJ; Wood BJ; Pinto PA; Choyke PL; Turkbey B
    J Urol; 2017 Sep; 198(3):583-590. PubMed ID: 28373133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The detection of significant prostate cancer is correlated with the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) in MRI/transrectal ultrasound fusion biopsy.
    Cash H; Maxeiner A; Stephan C; Fischer T; Durmus T; Holzmann J; Asbach P; Haas M; Hinz S; Neymeyer J; Miller K; Günzel K; Kempkensteffen C
    World J Urol; 2016 Apr; 34(4):525-32. PubMed ID: 26293117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Variation in Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion Targeted Biopsy Outcomes in Asian American Men: A Multicenter Study.
    Gross MD; Marks LS; Sonn GA; Green DA; Wang GJ; Shoag JE; Cabezon E; Margolis DJ; Robinson BD; Hu JC
    J Urol; 2020 Mar; 203(3):530-536. PubMed ID: 31502942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Targeted Biopsy in Detection of Prostate Cancer Harboring Adverse Pathological Features of Intraductal Carcinoma and Invasive Cribriform Carcinoma.
    Prendeville S; Gertner M; Maganti M; Pintilie M; Perlis N; Toi A; Evans AJ; Finelli A; van der Kwast TH; Ghai S
    J Urol; 2018 Jul; 200(1):104-113. PubMed ID: 29408568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Defining Novel and Practical Metrics to Assess the Deliverables of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion Prostate Biopsy.
    Ristau BT; Chen DYT; Ellis J; Malhotra A; DeMora L; Parsons RB; Milestone B; Brody M; Viterbo R; Greenberg R; Smaldone M; Uzzo R; Anaokar J; Kutikov A
    J Urol; 2018 Apr; 199(4):969-975. PubMed ID: 28988963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Risk Stratification of Equivocal Lesions on Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Prostate.
    Ullrich T; Quentin M; Arsov C; Schmaltz AK; Tschischka A; Laqua N; Hiester A; Blondin D; Rabenalt R; Albers P; Antoch G; Schimmöller L
    J Urol; 2018 Mar; 199(3):691-698. PubMed ID: 28941924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.