391 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33080153)
1. Negative Prebiopsy Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Risk of Significant Prostate Cancer: Baseline and Long-Term Followup Results.
Buisset J; Norris JM; Puech P; Leroy X; Ramdane N; Drumez E; Villers A; Olivier J
J Urol; 2021 Mar; 205(3):725-731. PubMed ID: 33080153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Application of the PRECISION Trial Biopsy Strategy to a Contemporary Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Targeted Biopsy Cohort-How Many Clinically Significant Prostate Cancers are Missed?
Feuer Z; Meng X; Rosenkrantz AB; Kasivisvanathan V; Moore CM; Huang R; Deng FM; Lepor H; Wysock JS; Huang WC; Taneja SS
J Urol; 2021 Mar; 205(3):740-747. PubMed ID: 33026927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Risk of Prostate Cancer after a Negative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Guided Biopsy.
Kinnaird A; Sharma V; Chuang R; Priester A; Tran E; Barsa DE; Delfin M; Kwan L; Sisk A; Felker E; Marks LS
J Urol; 2020 Dec; 204(6):1180-1186. PubMed ID: 32614257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of Transrectal Ultrasound Biopsy to Transperineal Template Mapping Biopsies Stratified by Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score in the PROMIS Trial.
Lovegrove CE; Miah S; El-Shater Bosaily A; Bott S; Brown L; Burns-Cox N; Dudderidge T; Freeman A; Henderson A; Hindley R; Kaplan R; Kirkham A; Oldroyd R; Parker C; Persad R; Punwani S; Rosario D; Shergill I; Winkler M; Emberton M; Ahmed HU
J Urol; 2020 Jan; 203(1):100-107. PubMed ID: 31335254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Analysis of histological findings obtained combining US/mp-MRI fusion-guided biopsies with systematic US biopsies: mp-MRI role in prostate cancer detection and false negative.
Faiella E; Santucci D; Greco F; Frauenfelder G; Giacobbe V; Muto G; Zobel BB; Grasso RF
Radiol Med; 2018 Feb; 123(2):143-152. PubMed ID: 29019021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Value of PSA Density in Combination with PI-RADS™ for the Accuracy of Prostate Cancer Prediction.
Distler FA; Radtke JP; Bonekamp D; Kesch C; Schlemmer HP; Wieczorek K; Kirchner M; Pahernik S; Hohenfellner M; Hadaschik BA
J Urol; 2017 Sep; 198(3):575-582. PubMed ID: 28373135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical Outcome Following Low Suspicion Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging or Benign Magnetic Resonance Imaging Guided Biopsy to Detect Prostate Cancer.
Boesen L; Nørgaard N; Løgager V; Thomsen HS
J Urol; 2017 Aug; 198(2):310-315. PubMed ID: 28235549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Which Patients with Negative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Can Safely Avoid Biopsy for Prostate Cancer?
Oishi M; Shin T; Ohe C; Nassiri N; Palmer SL; Aron M; Ashrafi AN; Cacciamani GE; Chen F; Duddalwar V; Stern MC; Ukimura O; Gill IS; Luis de Castro Abreu A
J Urol; 2019 Feb; 201(2):268-276. PubMed ID: 30189186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Negative Predictive Value of Prostate Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging among Men with Negative Prostate Biopsy and Elevated Prostate Specific Antigen: A Clinical Outcome Retrospective Cohort Study.
Lo G; Burton KR; Haider MA; Fleshner N; Finelli A; Ghai S
J Urol; 2019 Dec; 202(6):1159-1165. PubMed ID: 31188731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Risk-based Patient Selection for Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Prostate Biopsy after Negative Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Random Biopsy Avoids Unnecessary Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scans.
Alberts AR; Schoots IG; Bokhorst LP; van Leenders GJ; Bangma CH; Roobol MJ
Eur Urol; 2016 Jun; 69(6):1129-34. PubMed ID: 26651990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative analysis of transperineal template saturation prostate biopsy versus magnetic resonance imaging targeted biopsy with magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion guidance.
Radtke JP; Kuru TH; Boxler S; Alt CD; Popeneciu IV; Huettenbrink C; Klein T; Steinemann S; Bergstraesser C; Roethke M; Roth W; Schlemmer HP; Hohenfellner M; Hadaschik BA
J Urol; 2015 Jan; 193(1):87-94. PubMed ID: 25079939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Risk Stratification of Equivocal Lesions on Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Prostate.
Ullrich T; Quentin M; Arsov C; Schmaltz AK; Tschischka A; Laqua N; Hiester A; Blondin D; Rabenalt R; Albers P; Antoch G; Schimmöller L
J Urol; 2018 Mar; 199(3):691-698. PubMed ID: 28941924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Usefulness of pre-biopsy multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and clinical variables to reduce initial prostate biopsy in men with suspected clinically localized prostate cancer.
Numao N; Yoshida S; Komai Y; Ishii C; Kagawa M; Kijima T; Yokoyama M; Ishioka J; Matsuoka Y; Koga F; Saito K; Masuda H; Fujii Y; Kawakami S; Kihara K
J Urol; 2013 Aug; 190(2):502-8. PubMed ID: 23473904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prebiopsy Biparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Combined with Prostate-specific Antigen Density in Detecting and Ruling out Gleason 7-10 Prostate Cancer in Biopsy-naïve Men.
Boesen L; Nørgaard N; Løgager V; Balslev I; Bisbjerg R; Thestrup KC; Jakobsen H; Thomsen HS
Eur Urol Oncol; 2019 May; 2(3):311-319. PubMed ID: 31200846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Risk-stratification based on magnetic resonance imaging and prostate-specific antigen density may reduce unnecessary follow-up biopsy procedures in men on active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer.
Alberts AR; Roobol MJ; Drost FH; van Leenders GJ; Bokhorst LP; Bangma CH; Schoots IG
BJU Int; 2017 Oct; 120(4):511-519. PubMed ID: 28267899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Anterior Localization of Prostate Cancer Suspicious Lesions in 1,161 Patients Undergoing Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion Guided Targeted Biopsies.
Leyh-Bannurah SR; Kachanov M; Beyersdorff D; Preisser F; Tilki D; Fisch M; Graefen M; Budäus L
J Urol; 2018 Nov; 200(5):1035-1040. PubMed ID: 29935274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A Multicenter Study of the Clinical Utility of Nontargeted Systematic Transperineal Prostate Biopsies in Patients Undergoing Pre-Biopsy Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Connor MJ; Eldred-Evans D; van Son M; Hosking-Jervis F; Bertoncelli Tanaka M; Reddy D; Bass EJ; Powell L; Ahmad S; Pegers E; Joshi S; Sri D; Wong K; Tam H; Hrouda D; Qazi H; Gordon S; Winkler M; Ahmed HU
J Urol; 2020 Dec; 204(6):1195-1201. PubMed ID: 32516029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Utility of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging suspicion levels for detecting prostate cancer.
Rais-Bahrami S; Siddiqui MM; Turkbey B; Stamatakis L; Logan J; Hoang AN; Walton-Diaz A; Vourganti S; Truong H; Kruecker J; Merino MJ; Wood BJ; Choyke PL; Pinto PA
J Urol; 2013 Nov; 190(5):1721-1727. PubMed ID: 23727310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Magnetic Resonance Imaging Targeted Biopsy Improves Selection of Patients Considered for Active Surveillance for Clinically Low Risk Prostate Cancer Based on Systematic Biopsies.
Ouzzane A; Renard-Penna R; Marliere F; Mozer P; Olivier J; Barkatz J; Puech P; Villers A
J Urol; 2015 Aug; 194(2):350-6. PubMed ID: 25747105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Transperineal magnetic resonance image targeted prostate biopsy versus transperineal template prostate biopsy in the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer.
Kasivisvanathan V; Dufour R; Moore CM; Ahmed HU; Abd-Alazeez M; Charman SC; Freeman A; Allen C; Kirkham A; van der Meulen J; Emberton M
J Urol; 2013 Mar; 189(3):860-6. PubMed ID: 23063807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
