142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33080548)
1. Differential diagnosis of benign and malignant male breast lesions in mammography.
Huang Y; Xiao Q; Sun Y; Li Q; Wang S; Gu Y
Eur J Radiol; 2020 Nov; 132():109339. PubMed ID: 33080548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Image presentation. Sonographic appearances of benign and malignant male breast disease with mammographic and pathologic correlation.
Yitta S; Singer CI; Toth HB; Mercado CL
J Ultrasound Med; 2010 Jun; 29(6):931-47. PubMed ID: 20498468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The diagnostic performance of shear wave velocity ratio for the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant breast lesions: Compared with VTQ, and mammography.
Zhong LC; Yang T; Gu LP; Ma F
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2021; 77(2):123-131. PubMed ID: 32924988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Surgical decision making and factors determining a diagnosis of breast carcinoma in women presenting with nipple discharge.
Cabioglu N; Hunt KK; Singletary SE; Stephens TW; Marcy S; Meric F; Ross MI; Babiera GV; Ames FC; Kuerer HM
J Am Coll Surg; 2003 Mar; 196(3):354-64. PubMed ID: 12648684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Imaging characteristics of malignant lesions of the male breast.
Chen L; Chantra PK; Larsen LH; Barton P; Rohitopakarn M; Zhu EQ; Bassett LW
Radiographics; 2006; 26(4):993-1006. PubMed ID: 16844928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mammographic appearances of male breast disease.
Appelbaum AH; Evans GF; Levy KR; Amirkhan RH; Schumpert TD
Radiographics; 1999; 19(3):559-68. PubMed ID: 10336188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Mammographic symptomatology of malignant breast lesions].
Van Steen A; Van Ongeval C
J Belge Radiol; 1995 Feb; 78(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 7890589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnostic performance of perilesional radiomics analysis of contrast-enhanced mammography for the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions.
Wang S; Sun Y; Li R; Mao N; Li Q; Jiang T; Chen Q; Duan S; Xie H; Gu Y
Eur Radiol; 2022 Jan; 32(1):639-649. PubMed ID: 34189600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Magnetic resonance imaging features for differentiating breast papilloma with high-risk or malignant lesions from benign papilloma: a retrospective study on 158 patients.
Wang LJ; Wu P; Li XX; Luo R; Wang DB; Guan WB
World J Surg Oncol; 2018 Dec; 16(1):234. PubMed ID: 30558621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Papillary lesions of the breast: diagnostic imaging and contribution of percutaneous needle biopsy with 14G needle].
Bazzocchi M; Berra I; Francescutti GE; Del Frate C; Zuiani C; Puglisi F; Di Loreto C
Radiol Med; 2001 Jun; 101(6):424-31. PubMed ID: 11479438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Clinical value of suspicious calcification in the diagnosis and surgical treatment of breast lesions using contrast-enhanced spectral mammography].
Sun XF; Xing W; Yu SN; Sha YY; Pan L; Chen Q
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2020 Jan; 100(1):42-46. PubMed ID: 31914557
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Is breast MRI a helpful additional diagnostic test in suspicious mammographic microcalcifications?
Baltzer PAT; Bennani-Baiti B; Stöttinger A; Bumberger A; Kapetas P; Clauser P
Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Feb; 46():70-74. PubMed ID: 29122667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact of the Kaiser score on clinical decision-making in BI-RADS 4 mammographic calcifications examined with breast MRI.
Wengert GJ; Pipan F; Almohanna J; Bickel H; Polanec S; Kapetas P; Clauser P; Pinker K; Helbich TH; Baltzer PAT
Eur Radiol; 2020 Mar; 30(3):1451-1459. PubMed ID: 31797077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Breast Cancer Screening in High-Risk Men: A 12-year Longitudinal Observational Study of Male Breast Imaging Utilization and Outcomes.
Gao Y; Goldberg JE; Young TK; Babb JS; Moy L; Heller SL
Radiology; 2019 Nov; 293(2):282-291. PubMed ID: 31526252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Male breast lesions: which abnormalities really need core needle biopsy?
Bazzocchi M; Vianello E; Linda A; Londero V; Zuiani C
Tumori; 2010; 96(2):266-70. PubMed ID: 20572584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The evaluation of false negative mammography from malignant and benign breast lesions.
Wang J; Shih TT; Hsu JC; Li YW
Clin Imaging; 2000; 24(2):96-103. PubMed ID: 11124482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of visibility of circumscribed masses on Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) and 2D mammography: are circumscribed masses better visualized and assured of being benign on DBT?
Nakashima K; Uematsu T; Itoh T; Takahashi K; Nishimura S; Hayashi T; Sugino T
Eur Radiol; 2017 Feb; 27(2):570-577. PubMed ID: 27236817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Outcome of men presenting with clinical breast problems: the role of mammography and ultrasound.
Patterson SK; Helvie MA; Aziz K; Nees AV
Breast J; 2006; 12(5):418-23. PubMed ID: 16958958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Spectrum of imaging findings of papillary breast disease: A radiopathological review in a tertiary center.
Fadzli F; Rahmat K; Ramli MT; Rozalli FI; Hooi TK; Fadzli AN; Hoong SM; Ramli NM; Taib NAM
Medicine (Baltimore); 2021 Apr; 100(16):e25297. PubMed ID: 33879660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Growth Dynamics of Mammographic Calcifications: Differentiating Ductal Carcinoma in Situ from Benign Breast Disease.
Grimm LJ; Miller MM; Thomas SM; Liu Y; Lo JY; Hwang ES; Hyslop T; Ryser MD
Radiology; 2019 Jul; 292(1):77-83. PubMed ID: 31112087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
