These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33080575)

  • 1. A prototype Multi-X-ray-source array (MXA) for digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Becker AE; Hernandez AM; Boone JM; Schwoebel PR
    Phys Med Biol; 2020 Dec; 65(23):235033. PubMed ID: 33080575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. High resolution stationary digital breast tomosynthesis using distributed carbon nanotube x-ray source array.
    Qian X; Tucker A; Gidcumb E; Shan J; Yang G; Calderon-Colon X; Sultana S; Lu J; Zhou O; Spronk D; Sprenger F; Zhang Y; Kennedy D; Farbizio T; Jing Z
    Med Phys; 2012 Apr; 39(4):2090-9. PubMed ID: 22482630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Generation and analysis of clinically relevant breast imaging x-ray spectra.
    Hernandez AM; Seibert JA; Nosratieh A; Boone JM
    Med Phys; 2017 Jun; 44(6):2148-2160. PubMed ID: 28303582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. On a new multi-source X-ray tube concept for minimizing imaging time in digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Behling R
    Phys Med; 2021 Aug; 88():20-22. PubMed ID: 34167003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Design and characterization of a spatially distributed multibeam field emission x-ray source for stationary digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Qian X; Rajaram R; Calderon-Colon X; Yang G; Phan T; Lalush DS; Lu J; Zhou O
    Med Phys; 2009 Oct; 36(10):4389-99. PubMed ID: 19928069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Characterization and preliminary imaging evaluation of a clinical prototype stationary intraoral tomosynthesis system.
    Inscoe CR; Platin E; Mauriello SM; Broome A; Mol A; Gaalaas LR; Regan Anderson MW; Puett C; Lu J; Zhou O
    Med Phys; 2018 Nov; 45(11):5172-5185. PubMed ID: 30259988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Stationary chest tomosynthesis using a carbon nanotube x-ray source array: a feasibility study.
    Shan J; Tucker AW; Lee YZ; Heath MD; Wang X; Foos DH; Lu J; Zhou O
    Phys Med Biol; 2015 Jan; 60(1):81-100. PubMed ID: 25478786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Towards standardization of x-ray beam filters in digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis: Monte Carlo simulations and analytical modelling.
    Shrestha S; Vedantham S; Karellas A
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 Mar; 62(5):1969-1993. PubMed ID: 28075335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Breast Radiation Dose With CESM Compared With 2D FFDM and 3D Tomosynthesis Mammography.
    James JR; Pavlicek W; Hanson JA; Boltz TF; Patel BK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Feb; 208(2):362-372. PubMed ID: 28112559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Studies of a prototype linear stationary x-ray source for tomosynthesis imaging.
    Schwoebel PR; Boone JM; Shao J
    Phys Med Biol; 2014 May; 59(10):2393-413. PubMed ID: 24743496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dosimetric characterization of a dedicated breast computed tomography clinical prototype.
    Sechopoulos I; Feng SS; D'Orsi CJ
    Med Phys; 2010 Aug; 37(8):4110-20. PubMed ID: 20879571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The quantitative potential for breast tomosynthesis imaging.
    Shafer CM; Samei E; Lo JY
    Med Phys; 2010 Mar; 37(3):1004-16. PubMed ID: 20384236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Low dose high energy x-ray in-line phase sensitive imaging prototype: Investigation of optimal geometric conditions and design parameters.
    Ghani MU; Yan A; Wong MD; Li Y; Ren L; Wu X; Liu H
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2015; 23(6):667-82. PubMed ID: 26756405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of carbon nanotube x-ray source array for stationary head computed tomography.
    Spronk D; Luo Y; Inscoe CR; Lee YZ; Lu J; Zhou O
    Med Phys; 2021 Mar; 48(3):1089-1099. PubMed ID: 33382470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Simulation study of a quasi-monochromatic beam for x-ray computed mammotomography.
    McKinley RL; Tornai MP; Samei E; Bradshaw ML
    Med Phys; 2004 Apr; 31(4):800-13. PubMed ID: 15124997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects on image quality of a 2D antiscatter grid in x-ray digital breast tomosynthesis: Initial experience using the dual modality (x-ray and molecular) breast tomosynthesis scanner.
    Patel T; Peppard H; Williams MB
    Med Phys; 2016 Apr; 43(4):1720. PubMed ID: 27036570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dosimetric characterization and organ dose assessment in digital breast tomosynthesis: Measurements and Monte Carlo simulations using voxel phantoms.
    Baptista M; Di Maria S; Barros S; Figueira C; Sarmento M; Orvalho L; Vaz P
    Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):3788-800. PubMed ID: 26133581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Technique factors and their relationship to radiation dose in pendant geometry breast CT.
    Boone JM; Kwan AL; Seibert JA; Shah N; Lindfors KK; Nelson TR
    Med Phys; 2005 Dec; 32(12):3767-76. PubMed ID: 16475776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of kV, filtration, dose, and object size on soft tissue and iodine contrast in dedicated breast CT.
    Hernandez AM; Abbey CK; Ghazi P; Burkett G; Boone JM
    Med Phys; 2020 Jul; 47(7):2869-2880. PubMed ID: 32233091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Microcalcification detectability using a bench-top prototype photon-counting breast CT based on a Si strip detector.
    Cho HM; Ding H; Barber WC; Iwanczyk JS; Molloi S
    Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):4401-10. PubMed ID: 26133636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.