These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33081698)

  • 1. Bayesian splines versus fractional polynomials in network meta-analysis.
    Heinecke A; Tallarita M; De Iorio M
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Oct; 20(1):261. PubMed ID: 33081698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparative review of network meta-analysis models in longitudinal randomized controlled trial.
    Tallarita M; De Iorio M; Baio G
    Stat Med; 2019 Jul; 38(16):3053-3072. PubMed ID: 31050822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Theory and practice of Bayesian and frequentist frameworks for network meta-analysis.
    Sadeghirad B; Foroutan F; Zoratti MJ; Busse JW; Brignardello-Petersen R; Guyatt G; Thabane L
    BMJ Evid Based Med; 2023 Jun; 28(3):204-209. PubMed ID: 35760451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A design-by-treatment interaction model for network meta-analysis and meta-regression with integrated nested Laplace approximations.
    Günhan BK; Friede T; Held L
    Res Synth Methods; 2018 Jun; 9(2):179-194. PubMed ID: 29193801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Interpreting and assessing confidence in network meta-analysis results: an introduction for clinicians.
    Yang A; Pechlivanoglou P; Aoyama K
    J Anesth; 2022 Aug; 36(4):524-531. PubMed ID: 35641661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Predictive P-score for treatment ranking in Bayesian network meta-analysis.
    Rosenberger KJ; Duan R; Chen Y; Lin L
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Oct; 21(1):213. PubMed ID: 34657593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Network meta-analysis of longitudinal data using fractional polynomials.
    Jansen JP; Vieira MC; Cope S
    Stat Med; 2015 Jul; 34(15):2294-311. PubMed ID: 25877808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hypothesis testing in Bayesian network meta-analysis.
    Uhlmann L; Jensen K; Kieser M
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Nov; 18(1):128. PubMed ID: 30419827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Using structural equation modeling for network meta-analysis.
    Tu YK; Wu YC
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Jul; 17(1):104. PubMed ID: 28709406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bayesian one-step IPD network meta-analysis of time-to-event data using Royston-Parmar models.
    Freeman SC; Carpenter JR
    Res Synth Methods; 2017 Dec; 8(4):451-464. PubMed ID: 28742955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hierarchical Bayesian approaches for detecting inconsistency in network meta-analysis.
    Zhao H; Hodges JS; Ma H; Jiang Q; Carlin BP
    Stat Med; 2016 Sep; 35(20):3524-36. PubMed ID: 27037506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Comparison of Alternative Network Meta-Analysis Methods in the Presence of Nonproportional Hazards: A Case Study in First-Line Advanced or Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.
    Cope S; Chan K; Campbell H; Chen J; Borrill J; May JR; Malcolm W; Branchoux S; Kupas K; Jansen JP
    Value Health; 2023 Apr; 26(4):465-476. PubMed ID: 36503035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Nonproportional Hazards in Network Meta-Analysis: Efficient Strategies for Model Building and Analysis.
    Wiksten A; Hawkins N; Piepho HP; Gsteiger S
    Value Health; 2020 Jul; 23(7):918-927. PubMed ID: 32762994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Meta-analysis and Indirect Comparisons: on Methods, Paradigms, and Biologic Treatments for Psoriasis.
    Puig L
    Actas Dermosifiliogr (Engl Ed); 2021 Mar; 112(3):203-215. PubMed ID: 33053367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Two new methods to fit models for network meta-analysis with random inconsistency effects.
    Law M; Jackson D; Turner R; Rhodes K; Viechtbauer W
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Jul; 16():87. PubMed ID: 27465416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bayesian indirect and mixed treatment comparisons across longitudinal time points.
    Ding Y; Fu H
    Stat Med; 2013 Jul; 32(15):2613-28. PubMed ID: 23229717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Bayesian network meta-analysis for binary outcome: how to do it.
    Greco T; Landoni G; Biondi-Zoccai G; D'Ascenzo F; Zangrillo A
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2016 Oct; 25(5):1757-1773. PubMed ID: 23970014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bayesian meta-analysis using SAS PROC BGLIMM.
    Rott KW; Lin L; Hodges JS; Siegel L; Shi A; Chen Y; Chu H
    Res Synth Methods; 2021 Nov; 12(6):692-700. PubMed ID: 34245227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluating network meta-analysis and inconsistency using arm-parameterized model in structural equation modeling.
    Shih MC; Tu YK
    Res Synth Methods; 2019 Jun; 10(2):240-254. PubMed ID: 30834677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.