127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33082166)
1. Liverpool Lung Project lung cancer risk stratification model: calibration and prospective validation.
Field JK; Vulkan D; Davies MPA; Duffy SW; Gabe R
Thorax; 2021 Feb; 76(2):161-168. PubMed ID: 33082166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. OWL: an optimized and independently validated machine learning prediction model for lung cancer screening based on the UK Biobank, PLCO, and NLST populations.
Pan Z; Zhang R; Shen S; Lin Y; Zhang L; Wang X; Ye Q; Wang X; Chen J; Zhao Y; Christiani DC; Li Y; Chen F; Wei Y
EBioMedicine; 2023 Feb; 88():104443. PubMed ID: 36701900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Predicting the future risk of lung cancer: development, and internal and external validation of the CanPredict (lung) model in 19·67 million people and evaluation of model performance against seven other risk prediction models.
Liao W; Coupland CAC; Burchardt J; Baldwin DR; ; Gleeson FV; Hippisley-Cox J
Lancet Respir Med; 2023 Aug; 11(8):685-697. PubMed ID: 37030308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative performance of lung cancer risk models to define lung screening eligibility in the United Kingdom.
Robbins HA; Alcala K; Swerdlow AJ; Schoemaker MJ; Wareham N; Travis RC; Crosbie PAJ; Callister M; Baldwin DR; Landy R; Johansson M
Br J Cancer; 2021 Jun; 124(12):2026-2034. PubMed ID: 33846525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Analysis of lung cancer risk model (PLCO
Lebrett MB; Balata H; Evison M; Colligan D; Duerden R; Elton P; Greaves M; Howells J; Irion K; Karunaratne D; Lyons J; Mellor S; Myerscough A; Newton T; Sharman A; Smith E; Taylor B; Taylor S; Walsham A; Whittaker J; Barber PV; Tonge J; Robbins HA; Booton R; Crosbie PAJ
Thorax; 2020 Aug; 75(8):661-668. PubMed ID: 32631933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Predictive accuracy of the Liverpool Lung Project risk model for stratifying patients for computed tomography screening for lung cancer: a case-control and cohort validation study.
Raji OY; Duffy SW; Agbaje OF; Baker SG; Christiani DC; Cassidy A; Field JK
Ann Intern Med; 2012 Aug; 157(4):242-50. PubMed ID: 22910935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Participant selection for lung cancer screening by risk modelling (the Pan-Canadian Early Detection of Lung Cancer [PanCan] study): a single-arm, prospective study.
Tammemagi MC; Schmidt H; Martel S; McWilliams A; Goffin JR; Johnston MR; Nicholas G; Tremblay A; Bhatia R; Liu G; Soghrati K; Yasufuku K; Hwang DM; Laberge F; Gingras M; Pasian S; Couture C; Mayo JR; Nasute Fauerbach PV; Atkar-Khattra S; Peacock SJ; Cressman S; Ionescu D; English JC; Finley RJ; Yee J; Puksa S; Stewart L; Tsai S; Haider E; Boylan C; Cutz JC; Manos D; Xu Z; Goss GD; Seely JM; Amjadi K; Sekhon HS; Burrowes P; MacEachern P; Urbanski S; Sin DD; Tan WC; Leighl NB; Shepherd FA; Evans WK; Tsao MS; Lam S;
Lancet Oncol; 2017 Nov; 18(11):1523-1531. PubMed ID: 29055736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of Prediction Models for Identifying Malignancy in Pulmonary Nodules Detected via Low-Dose Computed Tomography.
González Maldonado S; Delorme S; Hüsing A; Motsch E; Kauczor HU; Heussel CP; Kaaks R
JAMA Netw Open; 2020 Feb; 3(2):e1921221. PubMed ID: 32058555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Development and Validation of a Multivariable Lung Cancer Risk Prediction Model That Includes Low-Dose Computed Tomography Screening Results: A Secondary Analysis of Data From the National Lung Screening Trial.
Tammemägi MC; Ten Haaf K; Toumazis I; Kong CY; Han SS; Jeon J; Commins J; Riley T; Meza R
JAMA Netw Open; 2019 Mar; 2(3):e190204. PubMed ID: 30821827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Implications of Nine Risk Prediction Models for Selecting Ever-Smokers for Computed Tomography Lung Cancer Screening.
Katki HA; Kovalchik SA; Petito LC; Cheung LC; Jacobs E; Jemal A; Berg CD; Chaturvedi AK
Ann Intern Med; 2018 Jul; 169(1):10-19. PubMed ID: 29800127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Characteristics of new solid nodules detected in incidence screening rounds of low-dose CT lung cancer screening: the NELSON study.
Walter JE; Heuvelmans MA; Bock GH; Yousaf-Khan U; Groen HJM; Aalst CMV; Nackaerts K; Ooijen PMAV; Koning HJ; Vliegenthart R; Oudkerk M
Thorax; 2018 Aug; 73(8):741-747. PubMed ID: 29661918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Selection of eligible participants for screening for lung cancer using primary care data.
O'Dowd EL; Ten Haaf K; Kaur J; Duffy SW; Hamilton W; Hubbard RB; Field JK; Callister ME; Janes SM; de Koning HJ; Rawlinson J; Baldwin DR
Thorax; 2022 Sep; 77(9):882-890. PubMed ID: 34716280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Preoperative diagnosis of malignant pulmonary nodules in lung cancer screening with a radiomics nomogram.
Liu A; Wang Z; Yang Y; Wang J; Dai X; Wang L; Lu Y; Xue F
Cancer Commun (Lond); 2020 Jan; 40(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 32125097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Occurrence and lung cancer probability of new solid nodules at incidence screening with low-dose CT: analysis of data from the randomised, controlled NELSON trial.
Walter JE; Heuvelmans MA; de Jong PA; Vliegenthart R; van Ooijen PMA; Peters RB; Ten Haaf K; Yousaf-Khan U; van der Aalst CM; de Bock GH; Mali W; Groen HJM; de Koning HJ; Oudkerk M
Lancet Oncol; 2016 Jul; 17(7):907-916. PubMed ID: 27283862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A risk prediction model for selecting high-risk population for computed tomography lung cancer screening in China.
Guo LW; Lyu ZY; Meng QC; Zheng LY; Chen Q; Liu Y; Xu HF; Kang RH; Zhang LY; Cao XQ; Liu SZ; Sun XB; Zhang JG; Zhang SK
Lung Cancer; 2022 Jan; 163():27-34. PubMed ID: 34894456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. External validation and recalibration of the Brock model to predict probability of cancer in pulmonary nodules using NLST data.
Winter A; Aberle DR; Hsu W
Thorax; 2019 Jun; 74(6):551-563. PubMed ID: 30898897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. External validation and comparison of the Brock model and Lung-RADS for the baseline lung cancer CT screening using data from the Korean Lung Cancer Screening Project.
Kim H; Kim HY; Goo JM; Kim Y
Eur Radiol; 2021 Jun; 31(6):4004-4015. PubMed ID: 33241512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Baseline Results of the West London lung cancer screening pilot study - Impact of mobile scanners and dual risk model utilisation.
Bartlett EC; Kemp SV; Ridge CA; Desai SR; Mirsadraee S; Morjaria JB; Shah PL; Popat S; Nicholson AG; Rice AJ; Jordan S; Begum S; Mani A; Derbyshire J; Morris K; Chen M; Peacock C; Addis J; Martins M; Kaye SB; Padley SPG; Devaraj A;
Lung Cancer; 2020 Oct; 148():12-19. PubMed ID: 32771715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Screen-detected subsolid pulmonary nodules: long-term follow-up and application of the PanCan lung cancer risk prediction model.
Zhao H; Marshall HM; Yang IA; Bowman RV; Ayres J; Crossin J; Lau M; Slaughter RE; Redmond S; Passmore L; McCaul E; Courtney D; Leong SC; Windsor M; Zimmerman PV; Fong KM
Br J Radiol; 2016; 89(1060):20160016. PubMed ID: 26882046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. When to reinvite initially ineligible populations for targeted lung cancer screening?
Goodley P; Crosbie PAJ; Sperrin M; Merchant Z; Booton R; Balata H
BMJ Open Respir Res; 2024 May; 11(1):. PubMed ID: 38754907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
