These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3308316)

  • 1. Conventional and rapid methods for yeast identification.
    Lin CC; Fung DY
    Crit Rev Microbiol; 1987; 14(4):273-89. PubMed ID: 3308316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Identification of yeast-like fungi: evaluation of 4 commercial systems].
    Russolo S; Sala A; Crotti D
    Quad Sclavo Diagn; 1984 Dec; 20(4):372-8. PubMed ID: 6399580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Performance of yeast identification systems. An analysis of the College of American Pathologists Special Mycology Survey data.
    Fuchs PC; Dolan CT
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1982 Oct; 78(4 Suppl):664-7. PubMed ID: 7137107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pasteur yeasts system, a test-kit for yeasts identification. Its evaluation in comparison with three commercial methods and conventional procedures.
    Riviera L; Bellotti MG
    Boll Ist Sieroter Milan; 1988; 67(3):245-50. PubMed ID: 3242563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of VITEK 2 colorimetric cards versus fluorimetric cards for identification of yeasts.
    Loïez C; Wallet F; Sendid B; Courcol RJ
    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2006 Dec; 56(4):455-7. PubMed ID: 16935457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of Abbott Quantum II yeast identification system.
    Salkin IF; Schadow KH; Bankaitis LA; McGinnis MR; Kemna ME
    J Clin Microbiol; 1985 Sep; 22(3):442-4. PubMed ID: 3900130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of the Baxter-MicroScan 4-hour enzyme-based yeast identification system.
    Land GA; Salkin IF; el-Zaatari M; McGinnis MR; Hashem G
    J Clin Microbiol; 1991 Apr; 29(4):718-22. PubMed ID: 1653786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of YeastIdent and Uni-Yeast-Tek yeast identification systems.
    Salkin IF; Land GA; Hurd NJ; Goldson PR; McGinnis MR
    J Clin Microbiol; 1987 Apr; 25(4):624-7. PubMed ID: 3571470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of a multitest microtechnique for yeast identification.
    Miller RE; Lu LP
    Am J Med Technol; 1976 Jul; 42(7):238-42. PubMed ID: 945942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Auxacolor, a new commercial system for yeast identification: evaluation of 182 strains comparatively with ID 32C.
    Fricker-Hidalgo H; Lebeau B; Kervroedan P; Faure O; Ambroise-Thomas P; Grillot R
    Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 1995; 53(4):221-5. PubMed ID: 7574109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of VITEK 2 and RapID yeast plus systems for yeast species identification: experience at a large clinical microbiology laboratory.
    Sanguinetti M; Porta R; Sali M; La Sorda M; Pecorini G; Fadda G; Posteraro B
    J Clin Microbiol; 2007 Apr; 45(4):1343-6. PubMed ID: 17287333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Efficacy of API 20C and ID 32C systems for identification of common and rare clinical yeast isolates.
    Ramani R; Gromadzki S; Pincus DH; Salkin IF; Chaturvedi V
    J Clin Microbiol; 1998 Nov; 36(11):3396-8. PubMed ID: 9774605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Yeast identification--past, present, and future methods.
    Pincus DH; Orenga S; Chatellier S
    Med Mycol; 2007 Mar; 45(2):97-121. PubMed ID: 17365647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative study of the new colorimetric VITEK 2 yeast identification card versus the older fluorometric card and of CHROMagar Candida as a source medium with the new card.
    Aubertine CL; Rivera M; Rohan SM; Larone DH
    J Clin Microbiol; 2006 Jan; 44(1):227-8. PubMed ID: 16390976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of the "Yeast-IDENT System" for the identification of medically important yeasts.
    Sekhon AS; Padhye AA; Garg AK; Gowa AH
    Mycoses; 1988 Dec; 31(12):627-31. PubMed ID: 3231235
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Factors accounting for misidentification of Candida species.
    Lo HJ; Ho YA; Ho M
    J Microbiol Immunol Infect; 2001 Sep; 34(3):171-7. PubMed ID: 11605807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Identification of types of yeast polluting the foodstuff sold in Beijing].
    He Y; Ju Z; Dong K; Du J
    Wei Sheng Yan Jiu; 2004 Jul; 33(4):497-8. PubMed ID: 15461289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of four commercial biochemical test systems for identification of yeasts.
    Bergan T; Hollum AB; Vangdal M
    Eur J Clin Microbiol; 1982 Aug; 1(4):217-22. PubMed ID: 6756911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of the Quantum II yeast identification system.
    Kiehn TE; Edwards FF; Tom D; Lieberman G; Bernard EM; Armstrong D
    J Clin Microbiol; 1985 Aug; 22(2):216-9. PubMed ID: 3897264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Commercial kits for yeast identification: concerns for standardisation.
    Freydière AM; Odds FC
    Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 2001 May; 20(5):366-7. PubMed ID: 11453605
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.