371 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33083537)
1. Training Medical Students to Create and Collaboratively Review Multiple-Choice Questions: A Comprehensive Workshop.
Kurtz J; Holman B; Monrad SU
MedEdPORTAL; 2020 Oct; 16():10986. PubMed ID: 33083537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Creating assessments as an active learning strategy: what are students' perceptions? A mixed methods study.
Kurtz JB; Lourie MA; Holman EE; Grob KL; Monrad SU
Med Educ Online; 2019 Dec; 24(1):1630239. PubMed ID: 31248355
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. A novel student-led approach to multiple-choice question generation and online database creation, with targeted clinician input.
Harris BH; Walsh JL; Tayyaba S; Harris DA; Wilson DJ; Smith PE
Teach Learn Med; 2015; 27(2):182-8. PubMed ID: 25893940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Medical students create multiple-choice questions for learning in pathology education: a pilot study.
Grainger R; Dai W; Osborne E; Kenwright D
BMC Med Educ; 2018 Aug; 18(1):201. PubMed ID: 30134898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Medical school 2.0: How we developed a student-generated question bank using small group learning.
Gooi AC; Sommerfeld CS
Med Teach; 2015; 37(10):892-6. PubMed ID: 25310243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Formative student-authored question bank: perceptions, question quality and association with summative performance.
Walsh JL; Harris BHL; Denny P; Smith P
Postgrad Med J; 2018 Feb; 94(1108):97-103. PubMed ID: 28866607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. PeerWise and Pathology: Discontinuing a teaching innovation that did not achieve its potential.
Smith CD; Dai A; Kenwright D; Grainger R
MedEdPublish (2016); 2020; 9():27. PubMed ID: 38058910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Answering questions in a co-created formative exam question bank improves summative exam performance, while students perceive benefits from answering, authoring, and peer discussion: A mixed methods analysis of PeerWise.
Guilding C; Pye RE; Butler S; Atkinson M; Field E
Pharmacol Res Perspect; 2021 Aug; 9(4):e00833. PubMed ID: 34309243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Question-Based Collaborative Learning for Constructive Curricular Alignment.
Wynn-Lawrence LS; Bala L; Fletcher RJ; Wilson RK; Sam AH
Adv Med Educ Pract; 2020; 11():1047-1053. PubMed ID: 33447126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Does Educator Training or Experience Affect the Quality of Multiple-Choice Questions?
Webb EM; Phuong JS; Naeger DM
Acad Radiol; 2015 Oct; 22(10):1317-22. PubMed ID: 26277486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Near-peer question writing and teaching programme.
Musbahi O; Nawab F; Dewan NI; Hoffer AJ; Ung JF; Suleman MT
Clin Teach; 2018 Oct; 15(5):387-392. PubMed ID: 28967198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Student generation and peer review of examination questions in the dental curriculum: Enhancing student engagement and learning.
Nguyen KA; Lucas C; Leadbeatter D
Eur J Dent Educ; 2020 Aug; 24(3):548-558. PubMed ID: 32347592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Writing Multiple Choice Questions-Has the Student Become the Master?
Pham H; Court-Kowalski S; Chan H; Devitt P
Teach Learn Med; 2023; 35(3):356-367. PubMed ID: 35491868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Development of a competency-based formative progress test with student-generated MCQs: Results from a multi-centre pilot study.
Wagener S; Möltner A; Tımbıl S; Gornostayeva M; Schultz JH; Brüstle P; Mohr D; Vander Beken A; Better J; Fries M; Gottschalk M; Günther J; Herrmann L; Kreisel C; Moczko T; Illg C; Jassowicz A; Müller A; Niesert M; Strübing F; Jünger J
GMS Z Med Ausbild; 2015; 32(4):Doc46. PubMed ID: 26483859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Will a Short Training Session Improve Multiple-Choice Item-Writing Quality by Dental School Faculty? A Pilot Study.
Dellinges MA; Curtis DA
J Dent Educ; 2017 Aug; 81(8):948-955. PubMed ID: 28765439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Innovative learning: employing medical students to write formative assessments.
Chamberlain S; Freeman A; Oldham J; Sanders D; Hudson N; Ricketts C
Med Teach; 2006 Nov; 28(7):656-9. PubMed ID: 17594561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The evaluation of a peer-led question-writing task.
Nwosu A; Mason S; Roberts A; Hugel H
Clin Teach; 2013 Jun; 10(3):151-4. PubMed ID: 23656675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of peer-generated MCQs to assess and support learning in a problem-based learning programme.
Botelho MG; Lam O; Watt RM; Leung D; Kember D
Eur J Dent Educ; 2018 Aug; 22(3):e358-e363. PubMed ID: 29266581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Choosing medical assessments: Does the multiple-choice question make the grade?
Pham H; Trigg M; Wu S; O'Connell A; Harry C; Barnard J; Devitt P
Educ Health (Abingdon); 2018; 31(2):65-71. PubMed ID: 30531047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Does developing multiple-choice Questions Improve Medical Students' Learning? A Systematic Review.
Touissi Y; Hjiej G; Hajjioui A; Ibrahimi A; Fourtassi M
Med Educ Online; 2022 Dec; 27(1):2005505. PubMed ID: 34969352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
