157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33084197)
1. Intra- and inter-evaluator reliability of the MyotonPRO for the assessment of the viscoelastic properties of caesarean section scar and unscarred skin.
Gilbert I; Gaudreault N; Gaboury I
Skin Res Technol; 2021 May; 27(3):370-375. PubMed ID: 33084197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The MyotonPRO: A reliable tool for quantifying the viscoelastic properties of a trigger point on the infraspinatus in non-traumatic chronic shoulder pain.
Roch M; Morin M; Gaudreault N
J Bodyw Mov Ther; 2020 Oct; 24(4):379-385. PubMed ID: 33218538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mechanical Properties of Muscles around the Shoulder in Breast Cancer Patients: Intra-rater and Inter-rater Reliability of the MyotonPRO.
Yeo SM; Kang H; An S; Cheong I; Kim Y; Hwang JH
PM R; 2020 Apr; 12(4):374-381. PubMed ID: 31359596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Exploring the Effects of Standardized Soft Tissue Mobilization on the Viscoelastic Properties, Pressure Pain Thresholds, and Tactile Pressure Thresholds of the Cesarean Section Scar.
Gilbert I; Gaudreault N; Gaboury I
J Integr Complement Med; 2022 Apr; 28(4):355-362. PubMed ID: 35426735
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Reliability of scar assessments performed with an integrated skin testing device - the DermaLab Combo(®).
Gankande TU; Duke JM; Danielsen PL; DeJong HM; Wood FM; Wallace HJ
Burns; 2014 Dec; 40(8):1521-9. PubMed ID: 24630817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reliability of the skin compliance device in the assessment of scar pliability.
Cleary C; Sanders AK; Nick TG
J Hand Ther; 2007; 20(3):232-7; quiz 238. PubMed ID: 17658416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Investigating the intra- and inter-rater reliability of a panel of subjective and objective burn scar measurement tools.
Lee KC; Bamford A; Gardiner F; Agovino A; Ter Horst B; Bishop J; Sitch A; Grover L; Logan A; Moiemen NS
Burns; 2019 Sep; 45(6):1311-1324. PubMed ID: 31327551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Scarbase Duo(®): Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability and validity of a compact dual scar assessment tool.
Fell M; Meirte J; Anthonissen M; Maertens K; Pleat J; Moortgat P
Burns; 2016 Mar; 42(2):336-44. PubMed ID: 26774602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An effective procedure for skin stiffness measurement to improve Paediatric Burn Care.
Elrod J; Müller B; Mohr C; Meuli M; Mazza E; Schiestl C
Burns; 2019 Aug; 45(5):1102-1111. PubMed ID: 30833098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reproducible Measurements of Muscle Characteristics Using the MyotonPRO Device: Comparison Between Individuals With and Without Paratonia.
Van Deun B; Hobbelen JSM; Cagnie B; Van Eetvelde B; Van Den Noortgate N; Cambier D
J Geriatr Phys Ther; 2018; 41(4):194-203. PubMed ID: 28005829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quadriceps muscle tone, elasticity and stiffness in older males: reliability and symmetry using the MyotonPRO.
Aird L; Samuel D; Stokes M
Arch Gerontol Geriatr; 2012; 55(2):e31-9. PubMed ID: 22503549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reliability of modified adheremeter and digital pressure algometer in measuring normal abdominal tissue and C-section scars.
Kelly-Martin R; Doughty L; Garkavi M; Wasserman JB
J Bodyw Mov Ther; 2018 Oct; 22(4):972-979. PubMed ID: 30368344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessing site-specificity of the biomechanical properties of hamstring aponeuroses using MyotonPRO: A cadaveric study.
Shan X; Otsuka S; Okubo T; Takeuchi T; Fukushige K; Naito M
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2024 Apr; 114():106230. PubMed ID: 38493724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A Novel, Reliable Protocol to Objectively Assess Scar Stiffness Using Shear Wave Elastography.
DeJong H; Abbott S; Zelesco M; Spilsbury K; Martin L; Sanderson R; Ziman M; Kennedy BF; Wood FM
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2020 Jul; 46(7):1614-1629. PubMed ID: 32386847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reliability of a portable device for quantifying tone and stiffness of quadriceps femoris and patellar tendon at different knee flexion angles.
Chen G; Wu J; Chen G; Lu Y; Ren W; Xu W; Xu X; Wu Z; Guan Y; Zheng Y; Qiu B
PLoS One; 2019; 14(7):e0220521. PubMed ID: 31365582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Direct comparison of reproducibility and reliability in quantitative assessments of burn scar properties.
Baumann ME; DeBruler DM; Blackstone BN; Coffey RA; Boyce ST; Supp DM; Bailey JK; Powell HM
Burns; 2021 Mar; 47(2):466-478. PubMed ID: 32839037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Feasibility of using a hand-held device to characterize tendon tissue biomechanics.
Sohirad S; Wilson D; Waugh C; Finnamore E; Scott A
PLoS One; 2017; 12(9):e0184463. PubMed ID: 28877266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessing the elastic properties of skeletal muscle and tendon using shearwave ultrasound elastography and MyotonPRO.
Feng YN; Li YP; Liu CL; Zhang ZJ
Sci Rep; 2018 Nov; 8(1):17064. PubMed ID: 30459432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Reliability of MyotonPRO in Assessing Masseter Muscle Stiffness and the Effect of Muscle Contraction.
Yu JF; Chang TT; Zhang ZJ
Med Sci Monit; 2020 Nov; 26():e926578. PubMed ID: 33137025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessing the viscoelastic properties of upper trapezius muscle: Intra- and inter-tester reliability and the effect of shoulder elevation.
Liu CL; Feng YN; Zhang HQ; Li YP; Zhu Y; Zhang ZJ
J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2018 Dec; 43():226-229. PubMed ID: 29103836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
